RONDINELLI BÉATRICE (FR)
GIACOMINI GIULIA (FR)
CENTRE NAT RECH SCIENT (FR)
INST NAT SANTE RECH MED (FR)
WO2018184113A1 | 2018-10-11 | |||
WO2010139069A1 | 2010-12-09 |
US4946778A | 1990-08-07 | |||
US6566135B1 | 2003-05-20 | |||
US6566131B1 | 2003-05-20 | |||
US6365354B1 | 2002-04-02 | |||
US6410323B1 | 2002-06-25 | |||
US6107091A | 2000-08-22 | |||
US6046321A | 2000-04-04 | |||
US5981732A | 1999-11-09 |
BOCCARD SANDRA G. ET AL: "Inhibition of DNA-repair genes Ercc1 and Mgmt enhances temozolomide efficacy in gliomas treatment: a pre-clinical study", ONCOTARGET, vol. 6, no. 30, 6 October 2015 (2015-10-06), pages 29456 - 29468, XP055956980, DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4909
TANG LEI ET AL: "Reduced expression of DNA repair genes and chemosensitivity in 1p19q codeleted lower-grade gliomas", JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, SPRINGER US, NEW YORK, vol. 139, no. 3, 19 June 2018 (2018-06-19), pages 563 - 571, XP036586419, ISSN: 0167-594X, [retrieved on 20180619], DOI: 10.1007/S11060-018-2915-4
SRIVASTAVA PALLAVI ET AL: "Targeting DNA repair with PNKP inhibition sensitizes radioresistant prostate cancer cells to high LET radiation", vol. 13, no. 1, 10 January 2018 (2018-01-10), pages e0190516, XP055956949, Retrieved from the Internet
MERENIUK TODD R. ET AL: "Genetic Screening for Synthetic Lethal Partners of Polynucleotide Kinase/Phosphatase: Potential for Targeting SHP-1-Depleted Cancers", vol. 72, no. 22, 15 November 2012 (2012-11-15), US, pages 5934 - 5944, XP055956951, ISSN: 0008-5472, Retrieved from the Internet
SHIRE ZAHRA ET AL: "Nanoencapsulation of Novel Inhibitors of PNKP for Selective Sensitization to Ionizing Radiation and Irinotecan and Induction of Synthetic Lethality", vol. 15, no. 6, 24 April 2018 (2018-04-24), US, pages 2316 - 2326, XP055956959, ISSN: 1543-8384, Retrieved from the Internet
BORSUK ROBYN ET AL: "Potent preclinical sensitivity to imipridone-based combination therapies in oncohistone H3K27M-mutant diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma is associated with induction of the integrated stress response, TRAIL death receptor DR5, reduced ClpX and apoptosis", AM J CANCER RES, 1 January 2021 (2021-01-01), XP055957600, Retrieved from the Internet
ACEYTUNO, R.D.PIETT, C.G.HAVALI-SHAHRIARI, Z.EDWARDS, R.A.REY, M.YE, R.JAVED, F.FANG, S.MANI, R.WEINFELD, M. ET AL.: "Structural and functional characterization of the PNKP-XRCC4-LigIV DNA repair complex", NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, vol. 45, 2017, pages 6238 - 6251
ADAM, S. ET AL.: "Real-Time Tracking of Parental Histones Reveals Their Contribution to Chromatin Integrity Following DNA Damage", MOL. CELL, vol. 64, 2016, pages 65 - 78, XP029761196, DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.019
BODOR, D. L.RODRIGUEZ, M. G.MORENO, N.JANSEN, L. E. T.: "Current Protocols in Cell Biology", 2012, JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., article "Analysis of Protein Turnover by Quantitative SNAP-Based Pulse-Chase Imaging"
DAY, C., GRIGORE, F., LANGFALD, A., HINCHCLIFFE, E. ROBINSON, J.: "CBIO-11. HISTONE H3.3 G34R/V MUTATIONS STIMULATE PEDIATRIC HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA FORMATION THROUGH THE INDUCTION OF CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY", NEURO-ONCOL, vol. 23, 2021, pages vi29
DESHMUKH, S.PTACK, A.KRUG, B.JABADO, N.: "Oncohistones: a roadmap to stalled development", FEBS J., 2021
DUMITRACHE, L. C.MCKINNON, P. J.: "Polynucleotide kinase-phosphatase (PNKP) mutations and neurologic disease", MECH. AGEING DEV., vol. 161, 2017, pages 121 - 129, XP029920802, DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2016.04.009
FERRAND J.RONDINELLI B.POLO S.E.: "Histone Variants: Guardians of Genome Integrity", CELLS, vol. 9, no. 11, 5 November 2020 (2020-11-05), pages 2424
FRESCHAUF GK ET AL.: "Identification of a small molecule inhibitor of the human DNA repair enzyme polynucleotide kinase/phosphatase", CANCER RES., vol. 69, no. 19, 1 October 2009 (2009-10-01), pages 7739 - 46, XP055111873, DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1805
HASHIZUME, R. ET AL.: "Pharmacologic inhibition of histone demethylation as a therapy for pediatric brainstem glioma", NAT. MED., vol. 20, 2014, pages 1394 - 1396, XP055390085, DOI: 10.1038/nm.3716
JILANI ARAMOTAR D.SLACK C.ONG C.YANG X.M.SCHERER S.W.LASKO D.D.: "Molecular cloning of the human gene, PNKP, encoding a polynucleotide kinase 3'-phosphatase and evidence for its role in repair of DNA strand breaks caused by oxidative damage", J BIOL CHEM, vol. 274, no. 34, 20 August 1999 (1999-08-20), pages 24176 - 86
KALASOVA IHANZLIKOVA HGUPTA NLI YALTMULLER JREYNOLDS JJSTEWART GSWOLLNIK BYIGIT GCALDECOTT KW: "Novel PNKP mutations causing defective DNA strand break repair and PARP1 hyperactivity in MCSZ", NEUROL GENET, vol. 5, no. 2, 25 March 2019 (2019-03-25), pages e320
KARIMI-BUSHERI F.DALY G.ROBINS PCANAS BPAPPIN D.J.SGOUROS J.MILLER G.G.FAKRAI H.DAVIS E.M.LE BEAU M.M.: "Molecular characterization of a human DNA kinase", J BIOL CHEM, vol. 274, no. 34, 20 August 1999 (1999-08-20), pages 24187 - 94
LIM, J. ET AL.: "Transcriptome and protein interaction profiling in cancer cells with mutations in histone H3.3", SCI. DATA, vol. 5, 2018, pages 180283
LOWE B. R. ET AL.: "Surprising phenotypic diversity of cancer-associated mutations of Gly 34 in the histone H3 tail", ELIFE, vol. 10, 2021, pages e65369
MERENIUK TR ET AL.: "Genetic screening for synthetic lethal partners of polynucleotide kinase/phosphatase: potential for targeting SHP-1-depleted cancers", CANCER RES., vol. 72, no. 22, 15 November 2012 (2012-11-15), pages 5934 - 44, XP055956951, DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0939
MERENIUK, T. R. ET AL.: "Synthetic lethal targeting of PTEN-deficient cancer cells using selective disruption of polynucleotide kinase/phosphatase", MOL. CANCER THER., vol. 12, 2013, pages 2135 - 2144
MORAS A.M.HENN J.G.REINHARDT L.S.LENZ G.MOURA D.J.: "Recent developments in drug delivery strategies for targeting DNA damage response in glioblastoma", LIFE SCIENCES, vol. 287, 15 December 2021 (2021-12-15), pages 120128
NAGARAJA, S. ET AL.: "Transcriptional Dependencies in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma", CANCER CELL, vol. 31, 2017, pages 635 - 652
PFISTER, S. X. ET AL.: "SETD2-Dependent Histone H3K36 Trimethylation Is Required for Homologous Recombination Repair and Genome Stability", CELL REP, vol. 7, 2014, pages 2006 - 2018, XP055134410, DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.05.026
PLESSIER, A.DRET, L.L.VARLET, P.BECCARIA, K.LACOMBE, J.MERIAUX, S.GEFFROY, F.FIETTE, L.FLAMANT, P.CHRETIEN, F. ET AL.: "New in vivo avatars of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) from stereotactic biopsies performed at diagnosis", ONCOTARGET, vol. 8, 2017, pages 52543 - 52559
RAGAZZINI, R. ET AL.: "EZHIP constrains Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 activity in germ cells", NOT. COMMUN., vol. 10, 2019, pages 3858
ROUX, K. J.KIM, D. I.RAIDA, M.BURKE, B.: "A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells", J. CELL BIOL., vol. 196, 2012, pages 801 - 810, XP002724820, DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201112098
SCOTT, W. A.CAMPOS, E. I.: "Interactions With Histone H3 & Tools to Study Them", FRONT. CELL DEV. BIOL., vol. 8, 2020, pages 701
SIRBU, B. M.COUCH, F. B.CORTEZ, D.: "Monitoring the spatiotemporal dynamics of proteins at replication forks and in assembled chromatin using isolation of proteins on nascent DNA", NAT. PROTOC., vol. 7, 2012, pages 594 - 605
SODERBERG, O. ET AL.: "Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation", NAT. METHODS, vol. 3, 2006, pages 995 - 1000, XP002522344, DOI: 10.1038/NMETH947
SOUTOGLOU, E.MISTELI, T.: "Activation of the cellular DNA damage response in the absence of DNA lesions", SCIENCE, vol. 320, 2008, pages 1507 - 1510
WEINBERG, D. N.ALLIS, C. D.LU, C.: "Perspect. Med.", vol. 7, 2017, COLD SPRING HARB, article "Oncogenic Mechanisms of Histone H3 Mutations", pages: a026443 - a026443
YADAV, R. K. ET AL.: "Histone H3G34R mutation causes replication stress, homologous recombination defects and genomic instability in S. pombe", ELIFE, vol. 6, 2017
WERBROUCK, C.EVANGELISTA, C.C.S.LOBON-IGLESIAS, M.-J.BARRET, E.TEUFF, G.L.MERLEVEDE, J.BRUSINI, R.BERGGRUEN, T.MONDINI, M.BOLLE, S: "TP53 Pathway Alterations Drive Radioresistance in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Gliomas (DIPG", CLIN CANCER RES, vol. 25, 2019, pages 6788 - 6800
CLAIMS 1. Inhibitor of the bifunctional polynucleotide kinase / phosphatase (PNKP) enzyme for use for inhibiting or preventing the proliferation of tumor cells bearing at least one H3 oncohistone mutation in a subject, said mutation inducing an increased binding of PNKP to mutated histone or to damaged replication forks in said tumor cells. 2. Inhibitor of PNKP for use according to claim 1, wherein said H3 oncohistone mutation affects histone variants H3.3 or H3.1. 3. Inhibitor of PNKP for use according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said H3 oncohistone mutation affects histone variants H3.3. 4. Inhibitor of PNKP for use according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein said tumor cells have unmutated PTEN, ING3, CDKN3, PTPN6 and/or SMG1 genes and/or normal expression of PTEN, ING3, CDKN3, PTPN6 and/or SMG1. 5. Inhibitor of PNKP for use according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein said tumor cells are chosen in the group consisting of: glioma, osteosarcoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, giant cell tumor of bone, chondroblastoma and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). 6. Inhibitor of PNKP for use according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein said tumor cells are glioma cells bearing at least one H3.3 oncohistone mutation showing increased binding of PNKP to mutated histone or to damaged replication forks in said tumor cells. 7. Inhibitor of PNKP for use according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein said tumor cells bear at least one mutation affecting the histone variant H3.3, said mutation being chosen in the group consisting of: G34W, K36M, K27M and G34R. 8. Inhibitor of PNKP for use according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein said tumor cells are glioma cells, such as paediatric glioma cells, bearing the mutation K27M or G34R on histone variant H3.3. 9. Inhibitor of PNKP for use according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein said tumor cells are giant cell tumor of bone cells bearing the mutation G34W in histone variant H3.3 or are chondroblastoma cells bearing the mutation K36M in histone variant H3.3. 10. Inhibitor of PNKP for use according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein said inhibitor is a small chemical drug, a peptide, an antibody, an aptamer or an interferent nucleic acid. 11. Inhibitor of PNKP for use according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein said inhibitor is a siRNA or a miRNA inhibiting the expression of the PNKP gene. 12. Inhibitor of PNKP for use according to any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein said inhibitor is a siRNA whose sequence is disclosed in SEQ ID NO :3, SEQ ID NO :4 or SEQ ID NO: 26. 13. Inhibitor of PNKP for use according to claim 11 or 12, wherein said siRNA or miRNA is associated with magnetic nanoparticles, nanotubes, liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, microvesicles, implants or micelles. 14. Inhibitor of PNKP for use according to any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein said inhibitor is administered in combination with a chemotherapeutic or a radiotherapeutic treatment in a patient diagnosed which said tumor. 15. An in vitro use of an inhibitor of the bifunctional polynucleotide kinase / phosphatase (PNKP) enzyme for inhibiting or preventing the proliferation of tumor cells bearing at least one H3 oncohistone mutation, said mutation inducing an increased binding of PNKP to mutated histone or to damaged replication forks in said tumor cells. |
EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1 1. Material and methods 1.1. Human cell lines U2OS (human osteosarcoma, female, American Type Culture Collection ATCC HTB-96) and HeLa cells (human cervical carcinoma, female, ATCC CCL-2) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium DMEM Gluta-Max (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Eurobio) and antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, Life Technologies) and maintained at 37 °C under 5% CO2 in a humified incubator. U2OS cells stably expressing SNAP-tagged wild-type or mutant H3.3, and U2OS LacO H3.3-SNAP cells with integrated 256 tandem LacO repeats and stably expressing SNAP-tagged wild-type H3.3 (Adam S. et al, 2016) were cultured in the same medium supplemented with 100 μg/ml G418 (Life Technologies). 1.2. Generation of U2OS stable cell lines U2OS cells stably expressing C-terminal, SNAP-tagged H3.3, either wild-type, K27M, G34R, G34V, G34W or K36M were generated by transfection of plasmid encoding wild-type or mutated H3.3 and selection of clones in limiting dilution in medium supplemented with G418 (Life Technologies) starting 48 hours after transfection. To verify the presence of mutations in the clones, genomic DNA was extracted and subjected to PCR amplification with the following primers: 5' – TGGCAGTACATCTACGTATTAGTCA- 3' (SEQ ID NO:5, upstream of the CMV promoter) and 5'- GCTGGTGAAAGTAGGCGTTG- 3' (SEQ ID NO:6, N-terminal to SNAP). The amplification product was verified by Sanger sequencing (GATC Biotech). Single clones harboring each H3.3 mutation were expanded and evaluated for levels of expression of the exogenous H3.3 proteins and for the presence of histone PTM alterations described in tumor samples. The mutant to wild-type H3.3 ratio was evaluated by western blot. 1.3. Primary pediatric human glioma cell lines SF9402 and SF9427 (wild-type H3.3) cell lines were cultured as previously reported (Haschizume R et al, 2014). SU-DIPG-XVII and HSJD-002-GBM were cultured in Tumor Stem Medium (Nagaraja S. et al, 2017), which contains DMEM/F12 1:1 (Invitrogen), Neurobasal-A (Invitrogen), 10 mM HEPES (Invitrogen), 1× MEM sodium pyruvate (Invitrogen), 1× MEM non-essential amino acids (Invitrogen), 1% GlutaMax (Invitrogen), 20 ng/mL human basic fibroblast growth factor (CliniSciences), 20 ng/mL human epidermal growth factor (CliniSciences), 20 ng/mL human platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-A and PDGF-B (CliniSciences), 10 ng/mL heparin (StemCell Technologies), and 1x B27 without Vitamin A (Invitrogen). DIPG lines were generally grown in suspension flasks as tumorspheres, except when they underwent transfection and proliferation assay, for which they were dissociated and plated on plates coated with laminin (10 μg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich). MGBM1 cells (H3.3G34R) were cultured in DMEM Gluta-Max supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin). All glioma cells were maintained at 37 °C under 5% CO2 in a humified incubator and verified for expression of the expected H3.3 proteins by Western blot analysis with antibodies raised against H3.3K27M or G34R (see Antibody list for details). 1.4. Drug treatments and inhibitors Camptothecin (CPT, Sigma-Aldrich) was used at 0.1 μM for 3 h, or at 1 μM for 1 or 3 h for iPOND in human cells, and at 5 or 10 μM in yeast cells; hydroxyurea (HU, Sigma-Aldrich) at 2 mM for 3 h; mitomycin C (MMC, Sigma-Aldrich) at 200 ng/mL and 25 ng/mL for 24 h for repair foci analyses and metaphase spreads, respectively; bleomycin (Bleo, Sigma-Aldrich) at 20 μg/mL for 3 h. An overnight treatment with 2 mM Thymidine followed by 3 h release in fresh medium was used to enrich cells in S phase for iPOND experiments (70-75% of cells were in S phase as evaluated by FACS). The EZH2 inhibitor GSK126 (EZH2i, Selleckchem) was used at 1 µM for 72 h. 1.5. Plasmids used in this study The H3F3A and H3F3B human cDNA sequences (GenScript) were cloned by using ClaI and EcoRI restriction enzymes into the pSNAPm plasmid (New England Biolabs), with the SNAP tag in the C- terminus of the insert (Table 1). These plasmids were subjected to directed mutagenesis to introduce the cancer-associated mutations (see Table 2 for details of the mutations, primers used and genes involved). Generation of the mutated plasmids was verified by Sanger sequencing (GATC Biotech). P H ) H ) p n m y- y- - u g u , Table 1. Plasmids used in this study Amino- M t t d Aff t P iti n 3’ g- - 3’ -3’ 3’ -3’ 3’ ’ ’ Table 2: Point mutations in H3.3 coding genes: primers used and associated cancers (primer sequences listed as SEQ ID NO:7-16) F = Forward, R = Reverse, CDS = Coding DNA Sequence. 1.6. Immunofluorescence, image acquisition and analysis Cells grown on glass coverslips (VWR) were either fixed directly with 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS or pre-extracted before fixation with 0.5% Triton X-100 in CSK buffer (Cytoskeletal buffer: 10 mM PIPES pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, 300 mM sucrose, 3 mM MgCl2) to remove soluble proteins (not bound to chromatin) and then fixed with 2% PFA. Samples were blocked in 5% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS supplemented with 0.1% Tween 20 (Euromedex) before incubation with primary antibodies and secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 or 568 (Invitrogen). Coverslips were mounted in Vectashield medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories) and observed with a Leica DMI6000 epifluorescence microscope using a Plan- Apochromat 40x/1.3 or 63x/1.4 oil objective. Images were captured using a CCD camera (Photometrics) and Metamorph software. Images were mounted with Adobe Photoshop applying the same treatment of fluorescence levels to all images from the same experiment. Fiji software was used for image analyses. Nuclei were delineated based on DAPI staining. S phase, replicating cells were discriminated based on EdU staining. The position of the LacO array was determined based on mCherry-LacR signal. DNA repair and PLA foci were identified and counted by using the find maxima function (Fiji software), on maximum intensity z-projections in the case of PLA foci. At least 70 cells/sample were scored in each experiment. Results of automatic foci counting were graphed as number of foci per cell or as number of cells with more than 5 or 10 DNA repair foci that was set as a threshold. 1.7. Ethynyl-deoxyUridine (EdU) labeling of S phase cells For discrimination of S phase cells, 10 μM 5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyUridine (EdU, Sigma-Aldrich) was incorporated into cells for 15 minutes prior to DNA damage treatment and fixation. EdU was revealed using Click-It EdU Imaging kit (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. 1.8. Random Plasmid Integration Assay (RPIA) Cells grown in 6-well plates were transfected with siRNAs and, later the same day, the cells were transfected with 2 μg/well gel-purified FspI-BspDI-linearized pEGFP-C1-IRES-puro plasmid (bicistronic vector coupling EGFP and puromycin expression). The cells were transfected once more with siRNAs the following day. Cells were collected 48 h later, counted and seeded in 10 cm diameter dishes either lacking or containing 0.375 µg/mL puromycin. The transfection efficiency was determined on the same day by FACS analysis of EGFP-positive cells. The cell dishes were incubated at 37°C to allow colony formation and medium was refreshed on day 4 and 8. On day 10-12, the cells were stained with 0.5 % Crystal Violet (Sigma-Aldrich)/20% ethanol solution to score colonies with more than 50 cells. Random plasmid integration events on the puromycin-containing plates were normalized to the plating efficiency (plate without puromycin) and to the transfection efficiency. 1.9. Fission yeast strains and genetic analyses Schizosaccharomyces pombe strains containing point mutations in histone H3, K27M in hht2+, G34R and G34V in hht3+, were generated by a PCR-based module method. pnk1∆ and xrc4∆ strains were derived from the fission yeast deletion library and the gene deletions were verified by PCR. All other strains were constructed through genetic crosses. For serial dilution plating assays (spot assays), ten- fold dilutions of a mid-log phase culture were plated on the indicated medium and grown for 3 days at 30°C. Overnight liquid S. pombe cultures were grown to saturation in YES media. Saturated cultures were equilibrated to an OD600 of 1.0, arrayed in a 96 well microtiter plate, and pinned in quadruplicate to achieve a 384 colony density (i.e. 4 technical replicates for each position of the microtiter plate) using a Singer RoToR robot (Singer Instruments, Inc. Somerset UK). Strains were grown on YES solid agar media with camptothecin concentrations indicated in the figure legends. Plates with pinned colonies were incubated at 30°C and scanned every 96 minutes for growth curves by measuring colony density. Expected fitness of a double mutant, ab (E ab ) was calculated as the multiplicative fitness contributions of each single mutant (F a , and F b ) scaled to fitness of wildtype (F wt ≡1). ^ ^^ = ^ ^ ⋅ ^ ^ ± ^ ^^ Error in expected fitness (ε ab ) was computed by propagating error from estimates of F a , and F b using the equation below. Care was taken to minimize systematic bias in experiments (e.g. by distributing strains evenly throughout the 96 well plate to minimize position and neighboring strain effects). 1.10. Metaphase spreads To prepare metaphase spreads, Colcemid (Gibco) was added to the culture medium at 0.1 μg/ml for 3 h before collecting the cells. Cells were washed in PBS and resuspended in 75 mM KCl for 15 min at 37°C. Cells were then fixed with fresh methanol/acetic acid (v/v=3:1) at -20°C for at least 16 hours. Cell pellets were further washed with fresh fixative before dropping onto slides. Chromosomes were stained with 5% Giemsa (Gibco) before mounting. Mytomycin (MMC) is added for 24 hours before fixing and harvesting at a concentration of 25 ng/mL. At least 30 metaphase spreads were scored per sample in each experiment for the presence of radial chromosomes. 1.11. Mutational signature analysis on primary pHGG samples pHGG samples for single nucleotide variant (SNV) mutational signature analysis were acquired from previously published data available under EGAS00001000575, EGAS00001001139, EGAS00001000572 and EGAS00001000192. Novel data was generated from samples obtained from the DIPG-BATs clinical trial (NCT01182350), the Dana-Farber Tissue Bank or collaborating institutions, under protocols approved by the institutional review board of the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center with informed consent (DFCI protocols 10417, 10201 and DFCI 19293). DNA was extracted from single Diffuse Midline Glioma cores, pHGG biopsies and autopsy samples using Qiagen AllPrep DNA/RNA extraction kits. For whole-genome sequencing, genomic DNA was fragmented and prepared for sequencing to 60X depth on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 instrument. Reads from both novel and published data were aligned to the reference genome hg19/ GRCh37 with BWA83, duplicate-marked, and indexed using SAMtools and Picard. Base quality score was bias adjusted for flowcell, lane, dinucleotide context, and machine cycle and recalibrated, and local realignment around insertions or deletions (indels) was achieved using the Genome Analysis Toolkit. SNV signature analysis was performed using Palimpsest on a VCF containing somatic mutations identified by Mutect2. 1.12. Extraction of cellular proteins and Western blot analysis Total extracts were obtained by scraping cells in Laemmli buffer (50 mM Tris HCl pH 6.8, 1.6% Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS), 8% glycerol, 4% β-mercaptoethanol, 0.0025% bromophenol blue) followed by 5-10 min denaturation at 95 °C. For western blot analysis, extracts along with molecular weight markers (Precision plus protein Kaleidoscope standards, Bio-Rad) were run on 4%–20% Mini-PROTEAN TGX gels (Bio-Rad) in running buffer (200 mM glycine, 25 mM Tris, 0.1% SDS) and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Protran) with a Trans-Blot SD semi-dry or wet (Bio-Rad) transfer cell. Proteins of interest were probed using the appropriate primary and Horse Radish Peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch), detected using SuperSignal West Pico or Femto chemiluminescence substrates (Pierce). The resulting signal was visualized on hyperfilms MP (Amersham) with a film processor (SRX105, Konica). Primary antibodies were : A R 5 B F γ H H Cambridge Research Biochemicals H33 G34R R bbit 1250 WB H H P P S C X H H H R S T A R 5 B F γ H H H (crb2005185f) Cambridge Research Biochemicals H33 G34V R bbit 11000 WB H P P S C X H H H R S T Secondary antibodies were: R R R Table 3: Antibodies used HRP: HorseRadish Peroxidase; IF: Immunofluorescence; PLA: Proximity Ligation assay WB: western blot 1.13. siRNA and plasmid transfections siRNAs purchased from Eurofins MWG Operon or Sigma-Aldrich (Table 4) were transfected into cells using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) following manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were analyzed and/or harvested 48 to 72 h post-transfection except for proliferation assays, where cells were analyzed over a 7-day period after transfection. Cells were transfected with plasmid DNA (see plasmid section) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. s iRNA Target sequence (5’- 3’) si d si si si si si si si Table 4: siRNA sequences (listed as SEQ ID NO:17-25) 1.14. SNAP labeling of newly synthesized histones. For labeling newly synthesized SNAP-tagged histones (Bodor et al, 2012), parental histones were quenched with 10 μM SNAP-cell Block (NEB) for 30 minutes in culture medium followed by 30-min wash in fresh medium and a 2-h chase. To mark S phase cells/replication forks, EdU was incorporated for 15 minutes just before the quench step. The new SNAP-tagged histones synthesized during the chase were fluorescently labelled with 4 μM of the green-fluorescent reagent SNAP-cell Oregon green (New England Biolabs) during a 30-min pulse step followed by 30-min wash in fresh medium. Alternatively, when combined with Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA), new SNAP-tagged histones were pulse-labeled for 30 min with 5 nM SNAP-biotin (New England Biolabs) diluted 1:200 in 10% Duolink blocking buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS. After washings, soluble proteins were removed by permeabilization with 0.5% Triton X-100 in cytoskeleton (CSK) buffer, and cells were fixed and processed for immunostaining or PLA. 1.15. Proximity Ligation assay (PLA) PLA (Söderberg O. et al, 2006) was performed to detect colocalization foci between newly synthesized H3.3-SNAP and γH2A.X at camptothecin-damaged replication forks. The Duolink® In Situ PLA® detection kit (Sigma) was used following manufacturer’s recommendations. Briefly, cells on glass coverslips (VWR) were incubated 1 h at 37 °C in Duolink blocking buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) and then for 1 h at room temperature with a mix of the two primary antibodies directed against the target proteins (anti-biotin to detect new H3.3-SNAP-biotin and anti-γH2A.X to detect sites of DNA damage) diluted in antibody dilution reagent (Sigma-Aldrich). Coverslips were then incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with secondary antibodies each harboring a PLA probe (Duolink In Situ PLA MINUS/PLUS probes, Sigma- Aldrich). The PLA probes that bind to the constant regions of the primary antibodies contain a unique DNA strand. If the proteins of interest interact with each other, the DNA probes hybridize to make circular DNA during the 30 min ligation step at 37 °C. The resulting circle DNA can be amplified (1 h 40 min amplification at 37 °C, Duolink In Situ Detection Reagents Green, Sigma-Aldrich) and visualized by fluorescently labeled complementary oligonucleotide probes incorporation. Coverslips were mounted in Duolink In Situ Mounting Medium with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich). To study PLA foci in S phase cells, EdU labeling by click chemistry was performed before the blocking step. 1.16. Isolation of proteins on nascent DNA (iPOND) iPOND was performed largely as described previously (Sirbu B.M. et al, 2012), with the following modifications. A total of 3 × 10 7 logarithmically growing cells per sample were labeled with 10 μM EdU for 15 min. Following EdU incorporation, cells were fixed with 1% formaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, followed by 5-min incubation with 0.125 M glycine to quench the formaldehyde. Cells were harvested by scraping, washed three times with PBS, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at −80 °C. Within two weeks, samples were processed for EdU-based pulldown and purification of replication fork-associated proteins. Briefly, click chemistry reactions were performed on pre- permeabilized samples to conjugate biotin to the EdU-labeled DNA by using Biotin Picolyl azide (Sigma Aldrich). Sonication was performed with a Bioruptor Pico sonicator (Diagenode) and DNA shearing was evaluated on an agarose gel. Shearing for optimal detection of the proteins of interest was set to an average DNA fragment size of 800 bp. Total input samples were taken after sonication and clearing of samples and kept at -20 °C until loading on SDS-PAGE gels. Streptavidin beads (Dynabeads MyOne Streptavidin-C1, Life technologies) were used to capture the biotin-conjugated DNA-protein complexes. Captured complexes were washed extensively using SDS and high-salt wash buffers. Purified replication fork proteins were eluted under reducing conditions by boiling in Laemmli sample buffer for 5 min. Total input and capture samples corresponding to equal amounts of cells were resolved on SDS-PAGE gels and analyzed by western blot. 1.17. Flow cytometry and cell cycle analysis Cells were fixed in ice-cold 70% ethanol before DNA staining with 50 μg/mL propidium iodide (Sigma- Aldrich) in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 and 0.5 mg/mL RNase A (USB/Affymetrix). DNA content was analyzed by flow cytometry using a FACSCalibur Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo Software (TreeStar). 1.18. Human cell proliferation assays The effect of PNKP knockdown on cell proliferation in human cells was measured as follows: 24 h after siRNA transfection, cells were seeded in 60-mm diameter tissue culture plates (20000 cells/plate for U2OS, 40000 to 80000 for pHGG cells). Cell viability was assessed after 3, 5 and 7 days in culture by staining with trypan blue (Invitrogen) and counting with an automated cell counter (Countess, Invitrogen). 1.19. Statistical analysis Statistical analyses were carried out using Graphpad Prism software. P values for mean comparisons between two groups were calculated with a Student’s t test with Welch’s correction when necessary. Multiple comparisons were performed by one- or two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni, Tukey’s or Dunnett’s post-tests or using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test in case of non-gaussian distributions. Comparisons of proliferation curves were based on non-linear regression with a polynomial quadratic model. ns: non-significant, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ****: p<0.0001. Statistical parameters including sample size (n) and dispersion of the data (SD or SEM) are indicated in the figure legends. 2. Results 2.1. H3.3 mutants drive misrepair in S phase To study the impact of various H3.3 mutations on DNA repair in human cells in an isogenic context, U2OS cell lines stably expressing SNAP-tagged wild-type or individual mutant H3.3 proteins (bearing K27M, G34R/V pHGG mutations, and G34W, K36M non-pHGG mutations) were generated in a wild- type background. The cell lines have comparable expression of the different H3.3-SNAP proteins. They also recapitulate the main histone PTM changes (H3K27me3 and H3K36me39) and the mutant to wild- type H3.3 ratio that characterize H3.3 mutant pHGGs (Weinberg, D. N., 2017). In this system, the focal accumulation of DNA damage response factors upon treatment was analyzed with different genotoxic agents. Similar to the positive control K36M, two pHGG mutants, K27M and G34R, showed impaired foci formation of the recombinase RAD51 Homolog 1 (RAD51), and of Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group D2 (FANCD2) (Figure 1A), involved in pathways that preferentially repair S phase damage. A possible compensatory activation of the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair pathway was studied in the same cell lines and it was observed increased foci formation of TP53- binding protein 1 (53BP1), a positive regulator of NHEJ. The altered recruitment of repair factors was detectable upon interference with replication fork (RF) progression by camptothecin (CPT), hydroxyurea (HU) or mitomycin C (MMC), but not upon treatment with the radiomimetic agent bleomycin, which triggers DNA damage throughout the cell cycle (Figure 1A, 1B), indicating that H3.3 K27M and G34R mutants skew the repair of RF-associated DNA lesions. Importantly, the observed defect is not due to a differential cell cycle distribution of cells expressing mutant H3.3 (not shown), to differential induction and signaling of DNA damage, as shown by comparable levels of γH2AX (not shown), nor to differential expression levels of repair proteins (not shown). To functionally analyze NHEJ activity, the Random Plasmid Integration Assay was used, which confirmed increased NHEJ activity in cells expressing the pHGG H3.3 mutants K27M and G34R, but not G34V (Figure 1C). G34R and G34V histone mutants also play opposing roles in DNA damage repair in fission yeast (Lowe B. R, 2021), prompting to exploit this model system to assess the possible conservation of increased, aberrant NHEJ activity in cells expressing pHGG mutants. Deletion of the core NHEJ factor xrc4 (xrc4Δ) sensitized H3 wildtype and G34V strains to CPT damage, consistent with a protective role of NHEJ in these strains, which was not observed in K27M and G34R strains (Figure 1D). xrc4 deletion (xrc4Δ) even rescued the CPT sensitivity of G34R yeast cells, indicating that aberrant NHEJ drives the sensitivity of this strain to CPT. To test whether aberrant DNA repair in H3.3K27M and G34R cells is associated with genome instability in human cells, we examined the occurrence of radials, chromosomal aberrations that derive from misjoining of broken chromatids through aberrant NHEJ. We observed a marked accumulation of radials in H3.3 G34R U2OS cells upon MMC treatment (Figure 1E). To conclusively link the aberrant DNA repair of H3.3K27M and G34R cells to genome instability onset in a glioma context, whole genome-sequencing data were analyzed from a panel of untreated, p53-mutant primary pHGGs for the presence of mutational signatures. Both H3.3K27M and G34R pHGGs presented higher levels of mutational signatures deriving from aberrant NHEJ (ID8) and defective HR (SBS3) compared to wild- type H3.3 pHGGs (Figure 1F). Collectively, these data support a model where the pHGG H3.3 mutations K27M and G34R skew the repair of S phase DNA damage towards aberrant NHEJ, thus sustaining a specific pattern of genome instability. 2.2. Gain-of-function DNA repair defect To test whether H3.3 pHGG mutants skew the repair of S phase damage through gain- or loss-of- function mechanisms, the impact of siRNA-mediated depletion of H3.3 was first evaluated on RAD51 and 53BP1 foci formation in CPT-damaged U2OS cells. Depletion of H3.3 did not affect the proportion of cells in S phase (not shown) nor γH2A.X induction in response to CPT (not shown). Contrary to H3.3 mutations, H3.3 loss did not alter RAD51 and 53BP1 foci formation post CPT (Figure 2A), despite an increase in 53BP1 nuclear levels (not shown). Thus, K27M and G34R mutations on H3.3 do not phenocopy H3.3 loss but rather confer a new function to histone H3.3 upon CPT-induced damage, corroborating the gain-of-function hypothesis. Dysregulation of gene expression programs by K27M and G34R H3.3 mutations is mediated by reduced trimethylation at lysines 27 and 36 of histone H3 (Weinberg D.N. et al, 2017 & Deshmukh, S. 2021) (H3K27me3 and H3K36me3), respectively. To study whether the observed DNA repair defect is mediated by analogous perturbations of histone PTMs, H3K27 and K36 trimethylation was reduced by inhibiting or depleting the corresponding histone methyltransferases. The H3K27 methyltransferase Enhancer of Zeste 2 (EZH2) is endogenously inhibited in U2OS cells (Ragazzini, R. et al. 2019), thus preventing further reduction of H3K27me3 upon expression of H3.3 K27M (not shown). Yet, aberrant DNA repair was observed in H3.3 K27M U2OS cells (Figure 1), arguing against a contribution of H3K27me3 reduction to this repair defect. This was confirmed by chemical inhibition of EZH2 (EZH2i) in HeLa cells (Figure 2B), which did not recapitulate the DNA repair defect previously observed upon H3.3 K27M expression. Similarly, reducing H3K36me3 by depleting SET Domain Containing 2 (SETD2) did not result in increased 53BP1 foci formation but solely in the expected reduction of RAD51 foci formation (Figure 2C). These experiments demonstrate that H3.3 K27M and G34R mutants skew DNA repair in S phase by conferring a gain-of-function to histone H3.3 independent from hypomethylation of H3 K27 and K36. 2.3. Mutant H3.3 deposition at damaged forks H3.3 de novo deposition at sites of DNA damage (Ferrand J., et al, 2020) prompted us to investigate whether wild-type and pHGG H3.3 mutants were de novo deposited at damaged RFs. First, fluorescent labeling of SNAP-tagged, newly synthesized histone H3.3 was exploited in a model of RF blockage, where stably integrated Lac operon arrays generate an obstacle to DNA polymerase progression when bound by the Lac repressor (LacR). Upon RF blockage, monitored by γH2AX accumulation (Figure 3A), a local enrichment of fluorescently labeled H3.3 was observed on the array specifically in S phase cells (Figure 3B), revealing a previously uncharacterized de novo deposition of H3.3 at sites of replication block. These findings were validated through the proteomic-based isolation of proteins at nascent DNA (iPOND45) upon RF damage with CPT in U2OS cells expressing wild-type H3.3-SNAP (Figure 3C). The enrichment of SNAP-tagged H3.3 at CPT-damaged RFs was enhanced in S phase synchronized cells, supporting an S phase-specific deposition of H3.3 at damaged RFs. The same approach revealed an accumulation of all pHGG H3.3 mutants at CPT-damaged RFs. To further study the deposition of newly synthesized H3.3 mutants, a novel imaging-based method was set-up: SNAP-PLA, that measures by Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA)(Söderberg et al, 2006) the colocalization between biotin-labeled, newly synthesized SNAP-tagged histones and γH2AX at CPT-damaged RFs (Figure 3D, left). Thus, we could detect de novo deposition of wild-type H3.3 specifically in CPT-damaged, S phase cells (Figure 3D, right), recapitulating data obtained in the LacO system (Figure 3B) and validating the SNAP-PLA approach. Moreover, de novo deposition of H3.3K27M and G34R mutants was detected at damaged RFs, which was comparable to that of wild-type H3.3, while the de novo deposition H3.3 G34V was slightly reduced (Figure 3D, right). These findings put forward a new, local function of H3.3 in RF protection and repair and suggest that pHGG H3.3 mutants may locally affect the chromatin landscape and/or the recruitment of repair factors at damaged RFs, ultimately skewing fork repair. 2.4. PNKP associates with mutant H3.3 To identify DNA repair factors that preferentially associate with the H3.3K27M and G34R mutants, we employed proximity-dependent biotinylation (BioID) (Scott, W. A. & Campos, E, 2020; Roux et al, 2012) in human cells ectopically expressing wild-type, K27M or G34R H3.3 proteins fused to the mutant BirA* biotin ligase followed by mass spectrometry analysis. Validating this approach, we detected the expected preferential association of EZH2 with the K27M mutant while Nuclear Receptor Binding SET Domain Protein 1 (NSD1), responsible for mono and dimethylation of H3K36, showed reduced association to G34R, in accordance with the reduced methylation of H3K36 by NSD1 in the presence of G34R (Figure 4A). Among the DNA repair enzymes that preferentially associated with both K27M and G34R compared to wild-type H3.3, we focused our attention on the DNA end processing enzyme Polynucleotide Kinase 3'-Phosphatase (PNKP), which contributes to NHEJ by transferring a phosphate group between broken DNA ends before ligation (Dumitrache, L. C. & McKinnon, P. J. 2017). Furthermore, PNKP was identified as an H3.3G34R interactor in a previous study (Lim, J. et al. 2018) and plays a central role in neurodevelopment (Dumitrache, L. C. & McKinnon, P. J.2017). PNKP total levels were not increased in cells expressing H3.3 K27M or G34R (not shown). However, by iPOND, we observed increased binding of PNKP to CPT-damaged RFs in H3.3K27M and G34R cells (Figure 4B), further substantiating the preferential association of this DNA repair enzyme with both H3.3 mutants. 2.5. PNKP promotes misrepair in mutant cells PNKP preferential association with H3.3K27M and G34R may drive the aberrant NHEJ observed in cells expressing these mutants. NHEJ activity was measured by random plasmid integration assay upon knockdown of PNKP in U2OS cells expressing wildtype or mutant H3.3. While PNKP knockdown, differently from XRCC4, does not affect NHEJ activity in wild-type H3.3 cells, it does reduce NHEJ in H3.3K27M and G34R cells, showing that PNKP mediates aberrant NHEJ repair in these cells (Figure 4C). Similarly, in fission yeast, the rescue of CPT-sensitivity in the G34R strain by xrc4 deletion was not observed upon co-deletion of the PNKP ortholog pnk1, arguing that the aberrant xrc4-mediated NHEJ in a G34R background is dependent on pnk1 (Figure 4D). Together, these data demonstrate that PNKP drives aberrant NHEJ in H3.3 mutant cells. 2.6. PNKP as a therapeutic target in pHGG The importance of aberrant PNKP function was next assessed in H3.3 mutant cells. PNKP knockdown specifically impaired the growth of H3.3K27M and G34R U2OS cells, but not of wild-type or G34V mutant H3.3 cells (not shown). Similarly, fission yeast strains engineered with K27M and G34R H3 mutations are dependent on pnk1 for proliferation while cells expressing wild-type H3 and the G34V mutant are not (not shown), supporting an evolutionarily conserved functional interaction of K27M and G34R histone mutations with the repair enzyme PNKP. By exploiting a panel of patient-derived glioma cells lines (not shown) and two different siRNAs against PNKP, the specific effect of PNKP knockdown was corroborated on the proliferation of glioma cells harboring endogenous H3.3G34R (MGBM1 and HSJD-002) or H3.3K27M (SU-DIPG-XVII) in contrast to glioma cells with wild-type H3.3 (SF9402 and SF9427), which were unaffected (Figure 4E). These data expand our findings to state-of- the-art pHGG systems and put forward PNKP as a potential therapeutic target in pHGG cells expressing specific H3.3 mutations. Discussion The present inventor shows that the mutations H3.3K27M and G34R affect RF repair through a mechanism that is distinct from their interference with gene expression programs. The DNA repair defect indeed does not rely on H3K27/K36me3 alterations, but may involve other PTM changes in mutant nucleosomes, possibly through the recruitment of histone modifying enzymes, which may in turn affect the binding of repair factors. H3.3 G34R and G34V mutants display strikingly opposite DNA repair phenotypes, conserved from yeast to human, the molecular bases of which are still elusive. It is speculated that the bulkier side chain of arginine chain may cause a more drastic disruption of the H3.3 interactome. The K27M mutation is also found in the H3.1 histone variant in some pHGG (Weinberg D.N. et al, 2017) and shown to inhibit NHEJ in human fibroblasts (Ferrand J., et al, 2020), an opposite phenotype to that of H3.3K27M in U2OS cells. Even if H3.1K27M and H3.3K27M can only be compared if studied in the same cellular background, differences in their DNA repair function can be anticipated since they show distinct distribution patterns in chromatin, present different co-occurring mutations (Ferrand J., et al, 2020) and clinical features in pHGG (Ferrand J., et al, 2020). EXAMPLE 2 1. Complementary material and methods 1.1. Cell lines NEM 375 pediatric glioma cell line (H3.3 K27M, p53 and ATRX mutant, GSC12 in (Werbrouck et al., 2019) was grown on laminin in TS medium supplemented with growth factors (NeuroCult NS-A medium with proliferation supplement, Stemcell technologies), heparin (2 µg/mL, Stemcell technologies), human-basic FGF (20 ng/ml, Peprotech), human-EGF (20 ng/ml, Peprotech), PDGF-AA (10 ng/ml, Peprotech), and PDGF-BB (10 ng/ml, Perprotech) (Plessier et al., 2017). Normal astrocytes CRL-8621 (ATCC) were grown in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) ATCC® 30-2003 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Eurobio) and antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, Life Technologies). 1.2. siRNA siPNKP 3’UTR: 5’- CCACAAUAAACGCUGUUUC-3’ (SEQ ID NO: 26). 1.3. Plasmids GFP: pEGFP-C2 (Clontech) GFP-PNKP: pEGFP-C2-PNKP(Aceytuno et al., 2017) 1.4. siRNA and plasmid co-transfection For rescue experiments, cells were concomitantly transfected with siRNA (50 nM final) and plasmid DNA (0.5 µg/ml final) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. 2. Results To assess the specificity and potential side effects of PNKP targeting, the inventors evaluated the anti- proliferative effect of PNKP downregulation in normal, non-transformed astrocytes. The inventors observed that PNKP knockdown did not impact cell growth in non-cancerous astrocytes (Figure 5a). To characterize the genetic determinants that correlate with an optimal anti-proliferative response to PNKP downregulation, it is important to evaluate the effect of PNKP downregulation in pHGG cell lines harboring different mutational status of genes such as ATRX and and TP53 that are known to be relevant for pHGG pathogenesis and radiotherapy response (Ferrand et al., 2020; Werbrouck et al., 2019). The inventors thus investigated the impact of PNKP knockdown in an additional H3.3 K27M pHGG cell line, NEM 375 (Werbrouck et al., 2019), which also harbors mutated ATRX and which was sensitive to PNKP knockdown (Figure 5b), similar to the ATRX wild-type cell line SU-DIPG-XVII. These results indicate that PNKP targeting efficiently impacts pHGG cell growth regardless of their ATRX mutational status. To conclusively link the anti-proliferative effect to PNKP loss-of-function, the inventors performed rescue experiments and observed that exogenous expression of GFP-tagged PNKP rescued cell growth in PNKP knocked down cells (Figure 5c). BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES Aceytuno, R.D., Piett, C.G., Havali-Shahriari, Z., Edwards, R.A., Rey, M., Ye, R., Javed, F., Fang, S., Mani, R., Weinfeld, M., et al. (2017). Structural and functional characterization of the PNKP–XRCC4–LigIV DNA repair complex. Nucleic Acids Res 45, 6238–6251. doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx275. Adam, S. et al. Real-Time Tracking of Parental Histones Reveals Their Contribution to Chromatin Integrity Following DNA Damage. Mol. Cell 64, 65–78 (2016). Bodor, D. L., Rodríguez, M. G., Moreno, N. & Jansen, L. E. T. Analysis of Protein Turnover by Quantitative SNAP-Based Pulse-Chase Imaging. in Current Protocols in Cell Biology vol. Chapter 8 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2012). Day, C., Grigore, F., Langfald, A., Hinchcliffe, E. & Robinson, J. CBIO-11. HISTONE H3.3 G34R/V MUTATIONS STIMULATE PEDIATRIC HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA FORMATION THROUGH THE INDUCTION OF CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY. Neuro-Oncol.23, vi29 (2021). Deshmukh, S., Ptack, A., Krug, B. & Jabado, N. Oncohistones: a roadmap to stalled development. FEBS J. (2021) doi:10.1111/febs.15963. Dumitrache, L. C. & McKinnon, P. J. Polynucleotide kinase-phosphatase (PNKP) mutations and neurologic disease. Mech. Ageing Dev.161, 121–129 (2017). Ferrand J., Rondinelli B., Polo S.E., Histone Variants: Guardians of Genome Integrity, Cells 2020 Nov 5;9(11):2424. doi.org/10.3390/cells9112424. Freschauf GK et al, Identification of a small molecule inhibitor of the human DNA repair enzyme polynucleotide kinase/phosphatase, Cancer Res.2009 Oct 1;69(19):7739-46 Hashizume, R. et al. Pharmacologic inhibition of histone demethylation as a therapy for pediatric brainstem glioma. Nat. Med.20, 1394–1396 (2014). Jilani A, Ramotar D., Slack C., Ong C., Yang X.M., Scherer S.W., Lasko D.D., Molecular cloning of the human gene, PNKP, encoding a polynucleotide kinase 3'-phosphatase and evidence for its role in repair of DNA strand breaks caused by oxidative damage J biol Chem 1999 Aug 20;274(34):24176-86 Kalasova I, Hanzlikova H, Gupta N, Li Y, Altmüller J, Reynolds JJ, Stewart GS, Wollnik B, Yigit G, Caldecott KW. Novel PNKP mutations causing defective DNA strand break repair and PARP1 hyperactivity in MCSZ Neurol Genet.2019 Mar 25;5(2):e320. Karimi-Busheri F., Daly G., Robins P, Canas B, Pappin D.J., Sgouros J., Miller G.G. Fakrai H., Davis E.M., Le Beau M.M., Weinfeld M., Molecular characterization of a human DNA kinase, J biol Chem 1999 Aug 20;274(34):24187-94. Lim, J. et al. Transcriptome and protein interaction profiling in cancer cells with mutations in histone H3.3. Sci. Data 5, 180283 (2018). Lowe B. R. et al. Surprising phenotypic diversity of cancer-associated mutations of Gly 34 in the histone H3 tail. eLife 10, e65369 (2021). Mereniuk TR et al, Genetic screening for synthetic lethal partners of polynucleotide kinase/phosphatase: potential for targeting SHP-1-depleted cancers Cancer Res. 2012 Nov 15;72(22):5934-44. Mereniuk, T. R. et al. Synthetic lethal targeting of PTEN-deficient cancer cells using selective disruption of polynucleotide kinase/phosphatase. Mol. Cancer Ther.12, 2135–2144 (2013). Moras A.M., Henn J.G., Reinhardt L.S., Lenz G., Moura D.J., Recent developments in drug delivery strategies for targeting DNA damage response in glioblastoma, Life sciences 2021 Dec 15;287:120128. Nagaraja, S. et al. Transcriptional Dependencies in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma. Cancer Cell 31, 635-652.e6 (2017) Pfister, S. X. et al. SETD2-Dependent Histone H3K36 Trimethylation Is Required for Homologous Recombination Repair and Genome Stability. Cell Rep.7, 2006–2018 (2014). Plessier, A., Dret, L.L., Varlet, P., Beccaria, K., Lacombe, J., Mériaux, S., Geffroy, F., Fiette, L., Flamant, P., Chrétien, F., et al. (2017). New in vivo avatars of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) from stereotactic biopsies performed at diagnosis. Oncotarget 8, 52543–52559. doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15002. Ragazzini, R. et al. EZHIP constrains Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 activity in germ cells. Nat. Commun.10, 3858 (2019). Roux, K. J., Kim, D. I., Raida, M., and Burke, B. (2012). A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol.196, 801–810. Scott, W. A. & Campos, E. I. Interactions With Histone H3 & Tools to Study Them. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 701 (2020). Sirbu, B. M., Couch, F. B. & Cortez, D. Monitoring the spatiotemporal dynamics of proteins at replication forks and in assembled chromatin using isolation of proteins on nascent DNA. Nat. Protoc. 7, 594–605 (2012). Söderberg, O. et al. Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation. Nat. Methods 3, 995–1000 (2006). Soutoglou, E. & Misteli, T. Activation of the cellular DNA damage response in the absence of DNA lesions. Science 320, 1507–1510 (2008). Weinberg, D. N., Allis, C. D. & Lu, C. Oncogenic Mechanisms of Histone H3 Mutations. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med.7, a026443–a026443 (2017). Yadav, R. K. et al. Histone H3G34R mutation causes replication stress, homologous recombination defects and genomic instability in S. pombe. eLife 6, (2017). Werbrouck, C., Evangelista, C.C.S., Lobón-Iglesias, M.-J., Barret, E., Teuff, G.L., Merlevede, J., Brusini, R., Berggruen, T., Mondini, M., Bolle, S., et al. (2019). TP53 Pathway Alterations Drive Radioresistance in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Gliomas (DIPG). Clin Cancer Res 25, 6788–6800. doi.org/10.1158/1078- 0432.ccr-19-0126.
Next Patent: UNDERWATER PIPELINE ANCHORING APPARATUS