YOGEV YUVAL (IL)
ROSANA CRESPO, SANDRA MONTERO VILLEGAS, MARTÍN C ABBA, MARGARITA G DE BRAVO, MÓNICA P POLO: "Transcriptional and posttranscriptional inhibition of HMGCR and PC biosynthesis by geraniol in 2 Hep-G2 cell proliferation linked pathways. ", BIOCHEMISTRY AND CELL BIOLOGY. BIOCHIMIE ET BIOLOGIE CELLULAIRE., NRC RESEARCH PRESS, CA, vol. 91, no. 3, 1 June 2013 (2013-06-01), CA , pages 131 - 139, XP009543345, ISSN: 0829-8211, DOI: 10.1139/bcb-2012-0076
MCGREGOR GRACE H., CAMPBELL ANDREW D., FEY SIGRID K., TUMANOV SERGEY, SUMPTON DAVID, BLANCO GIOVANNY RODRIGUEZ, MACKAY GILLIAN, NI: "Targeting the Metabolic Response to Statin-Mediated Oxidative Stress Produces a Synergistic Antitumor Response", CANCER RESEARCH, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH, US, vol. 80, no. 2, 15 January 2020 (2020-01-15), US, pages 175 - 188, XP093034364, ISSN: 0008-5472, DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-0644
BARBARA A.: "In vitro myotoxicity of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, pravastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin, using neonatal rat skeletal myocytes.", TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, vol. 131, no. 1, 31 March 1995 (1995-03-31), pages 163 - 174, XP093034366
J. FUHRMEISTER ET AL.: "Prooxidative toxicity and selenoprotein suppression by cerivastatin in muscle cells", TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, vol. 215, 1 January 2012 (2012-01-01), pages 219 - 227, XP002781071, DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.10.010
LI WEIHUA; LIANG XIAOJING; ZENG ZHIPENG; YU KAIZHEN; ZHAN SHAOPENG; SU QIANG; YAN YINZHI; MANSAI HUSEEN; QIAO WEITONG; YANG QI; QI: "Simvastatin inhibits glucose uptake activity and GLUT4 translocation through suppression of the IR/IRS-1/Akt signaling in C2C12 myotubes", BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, ELSEVIER, FR, vol. 83, 29 June 2016 (2016-06-29), FR , pages 194 - 200, XP029776634, ISSN: 0753-3322, DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.06.029
WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. A method for treating, preventing or alleviating impaired mevalonic acid production, comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of mevalonolactone to a subject in need thereof, thereby treating, preventing or alleviating impaired mevalonic acid production in the subject. 2. A method for treating, preventing or alleviating cell and/or tissue damage, caused at least in part due to impaired mevalonate pathway, comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of mevalonolactone to a subject in need thereof, thereby treating, preventing or alleviating cell and/or tissue damage in the subject. 3. A method for treating, preventing or alleviating cell and/or tissue damage, caused at least in part due to impaired mevalonic acid production, comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of mevalonolactone to a subject in need thereof, thereby treating, preventing or alleviating cell and/or tissue damage in the subject. 4. The method of claim 2 or 3, wherein the damaged cell or tissue is muscle cell or muscle tissue. 5. A method for treating, ameliorating or preventing a disease disorder or condition associated with impaired mevalonate pathway, comprising administrating to a subject in need thereof a therapeutically effective amount of mevalonolactone, thereby treating, ameliorating or preventing the disease disorder or condition in the subject. 6. A method for treating, ameliorating or preventing a disease disorder or condition associated with impaired mevalonic acid production, comprising administrating to a subject in need thereof a therapeutically effective amount of mevalonolactone, thereby treating, ameliorating or preventing the disease disorder or condition in the subject. 7. The method of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the impaired mevalonate pathway or the impaired mevalonic acid production is associated with impaired function of the enzyme 3- hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR). 8. A method for treating, preventing or ameliorating a disease, disorder or condition associated with impaired function of the enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR), comprising administrating a therapeutically effective amount of mevalonolactone to a subject in need thereof, thereby treating, ameliorating or preventing the disease disorder or condition in the subject. 9. The method of any one of claims 5 to 7, wherein the impaired function of the enzyme HMGCR is conversion of (3S)-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) to mevalonic acid. 10. The method of claim 8 or 9, wherein the impaired function of HMGCR enzyme is inhibited, suppressed or arrested activity of the enzyme. 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the enzyme is inhibited or suppressed due to one or more deleterious and/or harmful, direct or indirect, exogenous effects or agents. 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the exogenous agents are one or more toxins or medications, or a combination thereof. 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the medicament is at least one of a checkpoint inhibitor, immunotherapy, corticosteroids, cholesterol-lowering drug, amiodarone, colchicine, chloroquine, antivirals and protease inhibitor used in the treatment of HIV infection, omeprazole, or any combination thereof. 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the medicament is a statin. 15. The method of claim 10, wherein the enzyme is inhibited or suppressed due to one or more deleterious and/or harmful, direct or indirect, endogenous effects or events. 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the endogenous event is one or more of: a mutation, post transcriptional modification, protein post translational modification and/or a chemical or biological agent or factor produced in the body. 17. The method of claim 15 or 16, wherein the enzyme is inhibited, hindered or suppressed due to one of more mutations in the gene that encodes the enzyme (HMGCR). 18. A method for treatment, prevention or amelioration of a disease, syndrome, disorder or condition associated with statin-based therapy, comprising administrating a therapeutically effective amount of mevalonolactone to a subject in need thereof, thereby preventing, treating or ameliorating the statin-based therapy-associated disease, syndrome, disorder or condition in the subject. 19. The method of any one of claims 5 to 18, wherein the disease, syndrome, disorder or condition is one or more of: myopathy, statin-associated muscle symptom (SAMS), immune- mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), rhabdomyolysis, muscular toxicity syndrome, myalgia, sarcopenia, limb girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) or biallelic HGMCR mutation limb girdle muscular dystrophy (HGMCR-LGMD). 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the SAMS persists after statin cessation. 21. The method of any one of claims 1 to 20, wherein mevalonolactone is D- mevalonolactone (R-(-)-mevalonolactone). 22. The method of any one of claims 1 to 21, wherein mevalonolactone is administered to the subject orally. 23. A process for producing D-mevalonolactone, comprising the steps of: (i) obtaining E. coli bacteria cells transfected with a plasmid containing the gene coding for the enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR); (ii) transferring the transformed bacterial cells are into a bioreactor system containing a growth medium comprising yeast extracts and one or more osmotic stress controlling agents; (iii) growing the transformed bacteria cells until a sufficient biomass is achieved; (iv) inducing the transformed bacteria cells to synthesize D-mevalonolactone by the addition of an inducer; (v) separating the bacterial cells from the broth medium that contains the synthesized product; and (vi) extracting the D-mevalonolactone via organic extraction, facilitated by (a) acidification to a pH 2 to allow conversion of mevalonate to mevalonolactone; and (b) salt-outing to remove remaining cells and proteins. |
In some embodiments, the isomer D-mevalolactone produced via biologic processes is employed. DL-Mevalonolactone is a molecule of the formula:
The term "oral administration" as referred to herein, is a route of administration where a substance is taken through the mouth. Per os abbreviated to P.O. is sometimes used as a direction for medication to be taken orally. Many medications are taken orally because they are intended to have a systemic effect, reaching different parts of the body, for example, via the bloodstream.
The active agent mevalolactone may be formulated in solid, liquid or semi-solid dosage forms. Dosage forms suitable for oral administration include, but are not limited to, pills, tablets (e.g., buccal, sublingual or chewable tablets), capsules, powders, pastilles, lozenges, granules, liquid solutions or suspensions (e.g., drinks, elixirs, syrups, oral drops), pastes, buccal films, and oils. Buccal are dissolved inside the cheek; sublingual dissolved under the tongue; tablets may be swallowed, chewed or dissolved in water or under the tongue.
Further oral dosage forms include sustained -release tablets and capsules (which release the medication gradually, powders or granules, and dops.
The term "therapeutically effective amount" as used herein, means the amount or dose of a compound, e.g., mevalolactone, that, when administered to a subject for treating a disease, disorder or condition, as defined herein, is sufficient to effect such treatment for the disease, disorder or condition. The therapeutically effective amount may sometimes be the lowest dose level that yields a therapeutic benefit to patients, on average, or to a given percentage of patients. The 'therapeutically effective amount' can vary depending on the compound, the disease and its severity, and the age, weight, etc., of the subject to be treated.
In some embodiments, a therapeutically effective amount is a dose of from about 1 mg/kg to about 200 mg/kg, D-mevalolactone, for example, from about 1 mg/kg to about 150 mg/kg, from about 1 mg/kg to about 100 mg/kg, from about 2 mg/kg to about 100 mg/kg, from about 3 mg/kg to about 150 mg/kg, from about 2 mg/kg to about 100 mg/kg, from about 1 mg/kg to about 5 mg/kg, from about 2 mg/kg to about 10 mg/kg, from about 5 mg/kg to about 20 mg/kg, from about 15 mg/kg to about 35 mg/kg, from about 10 mg/kg to about 40 mg/kg, from about 20 mg/kg to about 80 mg/kg, from about 30 mg/kg to about 90 mg/kg, from about 25 mg/kg to about 60 mg/kg, from about 50 mg/kg to about 200 mg/kg and any subranges and individual values therebetween. In some embodiments, the dose is from about 8 mg/kg to about 50 mg/kg, from about 10 mg/kg to about 30mg/kg, from about 14 mg/kg to about 2030mg/kg, or about 16 mg/kg. Any of the above-indicated doses may be provided to a patient from 1 to 5 times a week, for example, from 1 to 3 times a week. The terms “therapy”, “treatment”, “treating”, “treat” as used herein are interchangeable and refer to: (a) preventing a disease, disorder, or condition from occurring in a human which may be predisposed to the disease, disorder and/or condition but has not yet been diagnosed as having it; (b) inhibiting the disease, disorder, or condition, i.e., arresting its development; (c) relieving, alleviating or ameliorating the disease, disorder, or condition, i.e., causing regression of the disease disorder and/or condition; and (d) curing the disease, disorder, or condition. In other words, the terms “therapy”, “treat,” “treatment,” and “treating,” extend to prophylaxis, namely, “prevent,” “prevention,” and “preventing,” as well as treatment per se of established conditions. Accordingly, use of the terms “prevent,” “prevention,” and “preventing,” would be an administration of the active agent to a person who has in the past suffered from the aforementioned conditions, such as, for example, myopathy or SAMS, but is not suffering from the conditions at the moment of the composition's administration. Thus, the terms “treatment”, “therapy” and the like include, but are not limited to, changes in the recipient's status. The changes can be either subjective or objective and can relate to features such as symptoms or signs of the disease, disorder, syndrome or condition being treated. For example, if the patient notes relief in muscle pain, freedom to move and be physically active, then successful treatment has occurred. Similarly, if the clinician notes objective changes, such as by neurologic assessment, then treatment has also been successful. Preventing the deterioration of a recipient's status is also included by the term. Therapeutic benefit includes any of several subjective or objective factors indicating a desirable response of the condition being treated as discussed herein Process for production of D-mevalonolactone The present inventors improved known method for the biological production of D- mevalonolactone. The improved process provided a yield at least 4 times higher that production yields obtained previously. The biological process comprises the use of bacterial fermentation in a bioreactor and is described in Example 1 herein. The principal steps of the process include: (i) Obtaining E. coli bacteria transfected with a plasmid containing the gene coding for the HGMCR enzyme, using any of the well-known transfection methods described in the art. Control of an inducible promotor (such as the Lac operon system) was employed. The transfected cells and are grown in Luria broth with appropriate antibiotic selection. Overexpressing genes that enhance HGMCR abundance may optionally be used to increase product yield. (ii) Transferring the transformed bacterial cells are into a large volume of Terrific broth (TB) medium in a bioreactor system. The TB medium is a nutritionally rich medium for the growth of bacteria. The formulation of TB medium contains increased concentrations of peptone, yeast extract, and glycerol as a carbon source. In the process disclosed herein, TB medium is supplemented with appropriate antibiotic, antifoam and osmotic stress controlling additives or agents such as sorbitol and betaine. The addition of osmotic stress controlling agents to the fermentation medium is a modification of known biological fermentation process conducted in bioreactors, and this modification substantially improves the yield and affords at least 4 time as much product compared to corresponding process which do not employ agents that compensate for osmotic stress. The temperature, pH, levels of dissolved oxygen and glucose concentration are controlled during the fermentation process. (iii) Growing the transformed bacteria cells until a sufficient biomass is achieved. (iv) Inducing the transformed bacteria cells to synthesize D-mevalonolactone by the addition of an inducer such as isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)). Fermentation is maintained throughout D-mevalonolactone production at appropriate pH, dissolved oxygen, temperature, and levels of nutrients, by glucose monitoring, pH-stat feeding and the like. (v) Separating the bacterial cells from the broth medium that contains the synthesized product. After fermentation ceases, the cell culture broth is centrifuged once to separate the cells and the pelleted cells are discarded. (vi) Extracting the D-mevalonolactone via organic extraction, which is facilitated by the following steps: (a) acidification to a pH 2 to allow conversion of mevalonate to mevalonolactone; and (b) addition of salt to saturation level in order to “salt-out” and remove remaining cells and proteins. After acidification and salting out, the solution is clarified by centrifugation or filtration to remove insoluble remains. Organic extraction is done using ethyl acetate or other appropriate organic solvents. The organic phase is maintained and evaporated. Additional organic extraction, acid-base extraction, distillation, column chromatography and other purification methods can be used to increase purity. The terms "comprises", "comprising", "includes", "including", “having” and their conjugates mean "including but not limited to". The term “consisting of” means “including and limited to” As used herein, the singular form "a", "an" and "the" include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. For example, the term "a compound" or "at least one compound" may include a plurality of compounds, including mixtures thereof. Whenever a numerical range is indicated herein, it is meant to include any cited numeral (fractional or integral) within the indicated range. The phrases “ranging/ranges between” afirst indicate number and a second indicate number and “ranging/ranges from” afirst indicate number “to” a second indicate number are used herein interchangeably and are meant to include thefirst and second indicated numbers and all the fractional and integral numerals therebetween. Various embodiments and aspects as delineated hereinabove and as claimed in the claims section below find experimental support in the following examples. EXAMPELS Reference is now made to the following examples, which together with the above descriptions illustrate some embodiments in a non-limiting fashion. Materials and Methods Patients Patients that participated in the clinical study were afflicted with a muscular disorder in an apparent autosomal recessive mode-of-inheritance, which was discovered and determined by the present inventors as a new form of genetic LGMD caused by mutated HMGCR. Six individuals of a single consanguineous Bedouin kindred (see Fig.1) were affected with the same disease. The patients developed limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, initially manifesting as muscle fatigue, mainly of the proximal muscles, with an onset during the 4th decade of life. Muscle symptoms were associated with pain on exertion at an earlier stage, progressively affecting mostly the proximal and axial muscles, culminating with involvement of respiratory muscles. The phenotype was non-remittent and progressive; the oldest three patients (V:2, 5 and 12 ages 49, 58 and 51, respectively) were unable to walk, were wheelchair-bound or bedridden, and suffered from respiratory insufficiency; patient V:2 was chronically ventilated by tracheostomy. Distal and facial muscles were mostly spared in all patients, and none suffered from any other neurological deficits or dysphagia. Imaging studies of the CNS showed no pathological process in all patients. MRI, CT and ultrasound scans showed various levels of atrophy with severe fatty replacement of skeletal muscles of large proximal muscles and axial muscles with sparing of the distal and facial muscles. These radiological features were distinct from known forms of limb girdle muscular dystrophy and were highly reminiscent of the MRI features of statin myopathy and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM). Electromyography (EMG) studies of four patients showed a myopathic pattern, and nerve conduction study (NCS) demonstrated normal distal latencies, amplitudes, and velocities. There were also no clear signs of cardiomyopathy; cardiac and chest CT scans done for patients V:9 and V:5 were normal, and echocardiography in 5 patients showed no abnormalities. Abdominal ultrasound demonstrated no pathological features. Pathological evaluation of muscle biopsies taken from the biceps or deltoid muscles of three patients, did not reveal any pathological features including fibrosis, inflammation, or any other abnormalities. Evaluation of thin sections by electron microscopy was normal as well. Laboratory investigations showed muscle injury with elevated creatine kinase (CK), an enzyme found in skeletal muscle, heart muscle and brain. When any of these tissues are damaged, they leak creatine kinase into the bloodstream. Elevated CK levels may indicate muscle injury or disease. Up to over X 250 upper level of normal CK (maximal CK of 35761U/L in patient V:8) was detected and elevated transaminases in all patients, and occasionally a mild rise in alkaline phosphatase which was seen only for the patients with severe phenotype. A rise in alkaline phosphatase is not uncommon, while the rise in CK is dramatic in comparison to other forms of muscular dystrophies. With disease progression and muscular atrophy, CK levels gradually normalized and eventually even dropped beneath normal limits, with simultaneous drop in creatinine levels, indicating low skeletal muscle mass. The patients did not display elevated levels of cholesterol and lipoproteins, with most patients frequently showing total cholesterol levels lower than 120 mg/dL. All patients had elevated fasting blood sugar levels above 126 mg/dL, with patient V:13 treated with insulin. Other than muscle symptoms and high blood sugar levels, no other overt pathologies were shared between the patients. Genetic evaluation of the patients included whole-exome sequencing of patient V:13 and patient V:2, and whole-genome SNP genotyping for all available affected and non-affected family members were analyzed as previously described (Wormser et al., Eur J Hum Genet, 2019, 27(6):928–40. Available from http://www.nature.com/articles/s41431-019-0347-z; Seelow et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 2016, 26:37. Available from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article- lookup/doi/10.1093/nar/gkp369). Genome-wide linkage analysis identified a single 3.2Mbp homozygous segment that was shared among all affected individuals and was either absent or found in a heterozygous state in unaffected individuals. Linkage analysis (multipoint and two- point) of chromosome 5 showing the shared locus and logarithm of the odds (LOD) score calculation were performed. An LOD score is a statistical estimate of the relative probability that two loci (e.g., a disease-associated gene and another sequence of interest, such as a variant or another gene) are located near each other on a chromosome and are therefore likely to be inherited together. The disease-associated locus was found on chromosome 5q13.2-q13.3, spanning between SNPs rs2129403 and rs2914143, 5:73803333-77084175 (GRCh38/hg38), and showed a maximal LOD score of 4.8204 at rs4345300. Following exome data filtering, only a single variant was found within the 3.2 Mbp locus. The mutated nucleotide coded amino acid, and the entire gene sequence was highly conserved throughout evolution; the Glycine to Aspartate substitution at position 822 was a radical replacement, predicted to interfere with several peptide bonds, disrupt helix-dipole and cause charge-based repulsion, with possible detrimental impact on secondary and tertiary structure of HMG-CoA reductase. Within the locus, there were no other variants, nor were there any variants in genes known to cause LGMD and LGMD-like diseases throughout the exomes. The HMGCR variant was validated via restriction analysis and Sanger sequencing (data not shown) and was found to fully segregate as expected for autosomal recessive heredity in the studied kindred. Of 190 non- related ethnically matched controls of tribes other than the one affected, none carried the variant. Screening of 20 individuals of the same tribe did not show other carriers. Six affected individuals ages 37-58 of a single consanguineous Bedouin, kindred from the Israeli Negev region were studied (Fig.1). Blood samples for DNA, RNA and various other tests were obtained from patients and unaffected family members following Soroka University Medical Center (SUMC) IRB approval and informed consent. Clinical phenotyping was determined by experienced neurologists and geneticist for all affected individuals, and genetic counseling was offered to direct family members. Imaging studies, electromyography (EMG), nerve conduction velocity (NCV) studies and muscle biopsies were conducted in accordance with common standards of medical practice and using common techniques. Animals All animal studies were conducted under the approval of institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) and in accordance with standards of animal care. Mice (C57B6/J) were purchased from Harlen, Israel. Protein purification HMGCR transcript NM_000859.3 was cloned from human skeletal muscle cDNA (Takara™, Shiga, Japan) into pJET vector using CloneJET PCR cloning kit (Thermo Scientific™, MA, USA). Mutagenesis was performed using standard technique. The catalytic portion of HMGCR (p.426-888) was sub-cloned into pGEX-6p plasmid (Cytiva™, MA, USA). Protein expression and purification were performed as described by Istvan et al. (Istvan et al., EMBO J., 2000, 19(5):819– 30. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10698924) with minor modifications. Briefly, pGEX-6P-HMGCR-426-888 was transformed to E. coli BL21 cells. Cells were grown in 2xYT broth (for growth of hosts for replication vectors, comprising NaCl, Peptone 140 (pancreatic digest of casein, and yeast extract) with 0.5 M sorbitol and 2.5 mM betaine and 100 mg/L ampicillin in 6L batches until OD600 = 0.6, after which expression was induced with 0.5 M isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and collected after 16 hr. Cell pellets were resuspended in Buffer A (bacteria lysis buffer, comprising 20 mM K 2 HPO 4 (pH=7.4), 20 mM Tris (pH=7.6), 500 mM (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM TCEP, 1 mM MgCl 2 , 10% glycerol, 0.01% and Triton X-100) disrupted using a FRENCH® Press (Thermo), and cleared lysates were purified by affinity chromatography using Pierce™ Glutathione Agarose (Thermo), washed with Buffer B (wash buffer and elution buffer, comprising 20 mM K 2 HPO 4 , 20 mM Tris (pH=8), 200 mM (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM TCEP, 10% glycerol). For elution of GST-fused protein 10 mM reduced glutathione was added) and either eluted with Buffer B with added glutathione, or washed with Buffer E (HMGCR protein and assay buffer, comprising 100 mM K 2 HPO 4 , 120 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM TCEP) digested on-column with HRV3C protease (SAE0045, Sigma) and then eluted with Euffer E. Protein was further purified using ÄKTAprime plus (Cytiva) system, using size exclusion on a SuperDex200 column, followed by ion-exchange using a Hitrap Q HP column with Buffers C and D (Buffer C is ion-exchange low salt buffer, comprising 50 mM K 2 HPO 4 , 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM TCEP. Buffer D is ion-exchange high salt buffer, comprising 50 mM K 2 HPO 4 , 1 M KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM TCEP). Lastly, purified protein was dialyzed and concentrated using Amicon® column (Merck-Millipore, MA, USA) and Buffer E and aliquots of purified protein in Buffer E were flash frozen at a concentration of 0.6 mg/mL. The purified protein was analyzed by western blot with a rabbit monoclonal anti-HMGCR antibody (SAB4200528, Sigma, MO, USA). HMG CoA reductase catalytic assay HMG CoA reductase enzymatic activity was assessed by a colorimetric assay. HMG CoA reductase reactions were set up in 96 well plates, with each well containing a total volume of 100 µL Buffer B, supplemented with 400 µM nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) (Sigma) and 2 µL of either: (i) wild type (WT) purified HMG CoA reductase protein; (ii) mutant HMG CoA reductase protein; (iii) WT enzyme with pravastatin (see further information below); (iv) or a no enzyme (control). Reactions were initiated by the addition of HMG-CoA substrate to a final concentration of 0-400 µM. Immediately after addition of HMG-CoA, plates were analyzed for 340 nm absorbance using an Infinite M200 plate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). Absorbance was monitored every 30 seconds for a total of 90 minutes. While repeating measurements, HMG CoA was added to either WT or mutant reactions in an alternating fashion in order to minimize technical variations in V 0 . Isothermal calorimetric (ITC) analysis Isothermal calorimetric studies were performed on a nano ITC instrument (TA Instruments, DE, USA). In order to facilitate pure substrate binding measurements and to avoid the reaction generated by HMG CoA reduction to mevalonate, the thermodynamic of HMGCR binding with pravastatin were analyzed (Carbonell et al., Biochemistry, 2005, 44(35):11741–8. Available from http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/bi050905v). HMG CoA reductase WT and mutant protein at a concentration of 20 µM in Buffer B supplemented with 1 mM NADPH in the reaction well were injected with 50 µM pravastatin in Buffer B supplemented with 1 mM NADPH using the multiple injection mode for a total 207 µL injections. Heat data were plotted using Nano Analyze software™. Anti-HMGCR antibodies assay Serological examination of patient serum for anti-HMGCR autoantibodies was performed as previously described (Mammen et al., Arthritis Rheum, 2018, 63(3):713–21. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21360500). Briefly, Nunc MaxiSorp™ plates were coated with 100 ng of WT HMGCR protein overnight at 4°C. Diluted serum from patients and controls (1:200) was added to the plate and incubated 1 hr at 37°C. Plates were washed and incubated with a rabbit anti-human-HRP antibody (ab5679, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Plates were developed using Pierce™ TMB Substrate Kit (Thermo) and analyzed with an Infinite M200 plate reader (Tecan). Rabbit anti-HMGCR antibody 1:5,000 and phosphate buffer saline (PBS) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. D-Mevalonolactone liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis Serum samples from patients and healthy volunteers were assessed by LC-MS. Sample preparation and chromatographic analysis were based on a previously described method (Cestari rt al., J. Pharm Biomed Anal., 2020, 182:1-7. Available from https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S07317085193271 41). Briefly, 100 µL serum samples or mevalonolactone standard (25-0 ng/mL in an 8-point serial dilution with high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade water) were added to 200 µL 0.1 M HCl and were shaken for 30 minutes at room temperature. Organic extraction was performed by addition of 1 mL ethyl acetate. Samples were shaken at room temperature for 1 hr, centrifuged at 3,000 g for 10 minutes, and 800 µL were transferred to a new HPLC vial and evaporated to dryness using a Savant SpeedVac™ (Thermo). Lastly, samples were reconstituted in 100 µL of 80% methanol, 20% water and 0.1% formic acid. Sample injections (10 µL) were separated on an Acquity HSS- T31.8 µm, 2.1 × 100 mm column and were analyzed in a Q Exactive focus hybrid quadrupole LC- MS system. Spectra were analyzed using the FreeStyle™ software. Statistical analysis All results were analyzed using GraphPad Prism V9 with student t-test, ANOVA analysis, and Michaelis-Menten kinetics studies. Data from PhenoMaster was also evaluated using CalR software. EXAMPLE 1 Bioreactor synthesis of mevalonolactone (i) Bioreactor process D-Mevalonolactone synthesis was performed using bacterial fermentation in a bioreactor, as follows: DH10B-strain E. coli cells, harboring the pMevT plasmid, were cultured overnight at 37°C, 180 RPM in a 250 mL shaker flask containing 100 mL of Luria broth (LB) media supplemented with 30 µg/mL chloramphenicol. Luria broth is a rich medium that is commonly used to culture members of the Enterobacteriaceae as well as for coliphage plaque assays. LB and related media (e.g., 2xYT, Terrific broth (TB)) are used extensively in recombinant DNA work and other molecular biology procedures. The culture was then used to inoculate a 10 L benchtop Jupiter bioreactor (Solaris, Porto Mantovano, Italy), containing 6L TB (20 g/L tryptone, 24 g/L yeast extract, 4 ml/L glycerol) media supplemented with 30 µg/mL chloramphenicol, 0.01% antifoam, 0.5M sorbitol and 25 mM betaine. The bioreactor was maintained at 37°C until the biomass reached OD600 = 30-60, after which the culture was induced using 1 mM isopropyl β-d- 1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and the temperature was reduced to 32°C and maintained for the entire duration of fermentation. During fermentation, the pH was set at 7.0 ± 0.1 by automatic addition of 25% ammonium hydroxide. Dissolved oxygen (DO) was maintained at 30% by a cascade function adjusting stirring rate, air flow and lastly O 2 flow, and the culture was fed with 40% glucose solution. Glucose concentration was kept under 0.5 g/L (50 mg/dL) using either manual tuning of glucose feeding speed or by pH-stat feeding by a logic loop operating such that whenever pH raised above 7, glucose flow was initiated at a rate of 0.1 mL/min, and when pH drops below 7, glucose flow was stopped. Antifoam was added automatically. DO, pH and temp were monitored off-site using the Solaris software and were also monitored and adjusted every 4 hours, when manually measuring OD 600 and glucose levels. Fermentation batches were cultured for 16-120 hr. Additional chloramphenicol and IPTG were added every 12 hours. An exemplary time course of mevalonolactone batch fermentation process is shown in Fig.2. (ii) Extraction and purification of D-mevalonolactone Cell culture broth was centrifuged at 12,000 g, 4°C for 10 minutes, cell pellets were discarded, and the remaining broth was acidified to pH 2 using 16% HCl and incubated at 45°C to facilitate conversion of mevalonic acid to mevalonolactone. The solution was saturated with NaCl and the resulting protein precipitates were discarded after either filtration using standard filter paper, centrifugation at 12,000 g, 4°C, for 10 minutes or both. The broth was then cooled and extracted for a minimum of 3 times using ethyl acetate in a 1L separatory funnel. Hard emulsions were either discarded or centrifuged at 3000 g for 5 minutes in glass tubes, and phases were separated and collected. The organic phase was evaporated using a rotary evaporator, and the remaining mevalonolactone was placed under high vacuum (10 -3 torr) overnight. Batches failing to show >94% purity by GC-MS were further purified by silica column chromatography, using ethyl acetate alone as the mobile phase. GC-MS analysis was used to inspect the resulting fractions. Other samples were further purified using acid-base extraction: samples were dissolved in ultra-pure water; pH was adjusted to 10 and the solution was extracted 3 times using ethyl acetate to remove all non-acidic components. The resulting solution was adjusted to pH 2 and extracted 3 times with ethyl acetate. The organic phase was then dried as described. (iii) D-Mevalonolactone purity analysis Purity was inspected by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Samples were dissolved in ethyl acetate and subjected to GC-MS on an Agilent 5977A GC/MSD system: 7890B Agilent GC system with an ultra-inert GC column (19091S-433UI) followed by an Agilent 5977A MS instrument. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a constant flow of 0.7 mL/min, and 1:50 split samples were injected. Injection port and MS source temperature were held constant at 230°C, and the MS quad temperature was held constant at 150°C. The column temperature gradient was as follows: 70°C for 0.5 min, 25°C/min to 150°C, 15°C/min to 200°C, 25°C/min to 300°C and held at the upper temperature for 1 min. Results were analyzed on Mass Hunter software, Mass spectrum was compared to Wiley/NIST 2014 library. For NMR analysis, samples were dissolved in deuterated chloroform (CDCl 3 ) in NMR tubes and were analyzed using an AVANCE III-400 device (Bruker) in 1 H, 13 C and DEPT NMR modes. Resulting spectra were compared to AIST spectral database. The purity analysis results shown in Figs.3A-3E indicate the obtention of pure mevalonolactone. EXAMPLE 2 D-Mevalonolactone toxicity study All animal studies were conducted under the approval of institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) and in accordance with standards of animal care. The safety of oral treatment with mevalonolactone was assessed by oral gavage. Mevalonolactone administered was produced by batch-fermentation as described in Example 1 above and was purified to over 94%. Impurities were analyzed and were all ascertained as non-hazardous. Gavage was performed using a 22-gauge olive tip curved gavage needle coated with a sugar solution, with 3 doses of 20, 200 and 2000 mg/kg of mevalonolactone or 0.9% saline solution daily for 7 days, to assess toxicity and chemical damage potential (N=5 for each group). Dose of 2000 mg/kg/day is more than 5 times the maximal weekly dose intended for human use. Blood samples were collected at day 0 from the mandibular vein. At day 7, mice were sacrificed, blood samples were collected, and organs were fixed with formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained with (i) hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (hematoxylin stains cell nuclei a purplish blue, and eosin stains the extracellular matrix and cytoplasm pink, with other structures taking on different shades, hues, and combinations of these colors); (ii) and periodic acid–Schiff (PAS; for detecting polysaccharides such as glycogen, and mucosubstances such as glycoproteins, glycolipids and mucins in tissues). Blood, gastro-intestinal (GI) tract, liver and muscle samples were examined. Slides were reviewed by an expert veterinary pathologist (Patho-Logica LTD, Israel). No major differences between groups were seen. Notably, high potassium levels were observed in all groups, including the untreated controls. This can be explained by the fact that blood studies for all groups was performed after CO 2 inhalation, which is known to increase potassium. EXAMPLE 3 Assessment of mutated HMG-CoA reductase biological function To validate the pathogenicity of the HMGCR mutation, functional analysis of the wild- type and mutant forms of the HMG-CoA reductase protein (HMGCR) were performed. Efficacy of the enzyme to convert the HMG-CoA substrate to mevalonic acid was evaluated. Spectro- colorimetric analysis of the WT and mutant proteins’ function using an NADPH-oxidation assay was performed as described in Materials and Methods above. The results are shown in Table 1 and Fig.5. Table 1. HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) wild type and mutant activity The mutant protein presented a 69% reduction in Vmax and 65% increase in Km in relation to the substrate HMG-CoA, indicating lower affinity of the mutated protein for HMG-CoA as well as overall slower reaction-rate (Fig. 5, Table 1)). This was also supported by isothermal calorimetric (ITC) analysis of the thermodynamics of HMG-CoA reductase to a known inhibitor, pravastatin. The overall thermodynamic values of the ITC assay using HMG-CoA as the analyte would represent both binding of the substrate to HMGCR, as well as the thermodynamics of the reduction reaction. To avoid this, pravastatin, a statin, which binds to the same catalytic pocket as HMG-CoA, was selected. As seen in Figs.6A-6C, the WT protein showed a mild exothermic reaction, while the mutant form displayed kinetics almost identical to a no-protein control, indicating a very low affinity of the proteins’ catalytic portion towards statins. EXAMPLE 4 D-Mevalonolactone treatment of patient afflicted with a novel form of LGMD associated with HMGCR mutation Treatment with D-mevalonolactone was conducted under the approval and supervision of the drug committee safe use of medicines (SUMC) and the Israeli Ministry of Health (MOH) under an “expanded access/compassionate use” protocol, given the severe condition of patients and the lack of alternative treatments for LGMD associated with HMGCR mutation. The patient treated was patient V:2 (see Fig.1). Patient was instructed as to the risks and possible benefits and granted signed informed consent. The treatment trial was monitored by a senior neurologist, and safety and efficacy reports were issued to the MOH in accordance with standard procedure. Prior to initiation of treatment, the patient was thoroughly examined, including a neurological exam by a senior neurologist, imaging studies, electrophysiological studies, and blood work. Alongside severe limb girdle myopathy, a notable finding was the lack of Anti- HMGCR antibodies in all patients. No other rheumatological abnormalities were detected. Serum mevalonolactone level of patient V:2 (determine as described in Materials and Methods) was 14.5-29.1% lower than the normal average. Treatment protocol was planned as an escalating dose of oral D-mevalonolactone dissolved in water or encapsulated in gelatin caps, given once weekly. The intended treatment plan is schematically shown in Fig.4A. Practically, the treatment plan was modified to facilitate the patients’ needs, coincidental events and therapeutic goals, as seen in Fig.4B. Initial treatment plan included a single weekly oral dose of mevalonolactone diluted in tap water starting at 2 mg/kg/week with a weekly doubling up to 400 mg/kg/week. However, since subjective and objective improvement was noticed, the dose was maintained at 16 mg/kg, given up to 3 times a week. Mevalonolactone oral uptake was found to be very rapid: mevalonate levels began to rise 20 minutes after oral administration, peaked at 50 minutes and returned to baseline levels 2 hours after ingestion (Fig.7). During treatment the patient was monitored closely, with weekly questioning, physical examination, spirometry, blood tests and manual muscle dynamometry (Lafayette instruments®, IN, USA) done by a member of the trial staff, and bi-monthly exam by a senior neurologist. Whole-body MRI, thorough blood investigation, echocardiography, abdominal ultrasound, electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction study (NCS) tests were done prior to commencement of treatment and one year into the treatment. Electromyography measured muscle response or electrical activity in response to a nerve's stimulation of the muscle. Nerve conduction velocity measured how fast electrical signals moved through a nerve and was performed to evaluate nerve function. These tests assessed the muscles for abnormalities. During treatment there was improvement in muscle strength as assessed by dynamometry and by manual muscle testing MMT (Figs.8A-8B). Improvement was noticed among all muscle groups, with the greatest improvement seen in the deltoid muscles. Distal muscles of the lower limb showed normal strength at the beginning of the trial and were not assessed by dynamometry after 3 months into the trial. Respiratory muscles were assessed by spirometry, which demonstrated marked increase in peak expiratory flow, Forced vital capacity and FEV1 (Fig.8C). In addition to objective measurements of muscle strength, the patient showed remarkable improvement in independence and function in activities of daily living that were not feasible prior to treatment initiation. For example, the patient was able to raise herself from lying sideways to a sitting position, to fully abduct her arm when laying, to extend her knees to 150°, to feed her grandchild on her own and to stand with assistance. Her respiratory muscles also improved, and she was able to breath without her ventilator for over 2 hours while maintaining O 2 saturation >96%. Adverse effects to the treatment were minimal. While throughout the one year treatment period there were occasional rare gastrointestinal symptoms, including mild nausea, diarrhea, constipation, urinary tract infections, a single occasion of near syncope, moderate headaches, rare temporary occurrences of a subjective sensation of limb swelling and of borderline mild dilatation of small veins in the upper and lower limbs, none of those episodes was unusual in frequency or severity compared to pre-treatment, and none of those minor episodes could be directly related to the treatment, required medical treatment or hospitalization. However, noticeable pigmentation of the proximal nail fold was seen on 4 different occasions in direct relation to treatment. The discoloration appeared shortly after treatment and vanished after 2-3 days of mevalonolactone ingestion and did not appear to be in relation to any vascular insufficiency, as assessed by presence of peripheral pulses, normal capillary refill, absence of pain and point-of-care doppler ultrasonography (Vscan extend, GE Healthcare, IL, USA). With the continuation of treatment, this effect subsided but did appear after dose escalation and after intermissions in treatment regimen. EXAMPLE 5 Mevalonolactone treatment in a model of statin myopathy HMG-CoA reductase is the drug target of the lipid-lowering drug class statin, which is one of the most prescribed drug class in the world. Statins are well known for their most common adverse effect, statin-induced myopathy which may affect up to 30% of treated patients. Given the apparent safety of mevalonolactone oral treatment in HMGCR-LGMD, its utility in the treatment of a more prevalent condition, statin myopathy, was assessed employing a murine model of severe statin-induced myopathy (Chung et al., PLoS One, 2020, 11(12):e0168065. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168065; Meador and Huey, Muscle Nerve, 2021, 44(6):882-889. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/mus.22236). C57B6/J mice were randomized to six treatment groups), n=4 for each group: (i) (ii) cerivastatin (ab142853, abcam) 1 mg/kg/day intraperitoneally (IP) injected. Cerivastatin was injected at a concentration of 0.3 mg/mL, injections volume was calculated by animal weight; (ii) Cerivastatin IP injected with 200 mg/kg/day mevalonolactone in provided in drinking water; (iii) simvastatin, alkaline hydrolyzed (sc-200829, Santa Cruz biotechnology, TX, USA) 20 mg/kg/day IP injected without mevalonolactone. Simvastatin was injected at a concentration of 5.4 mg/mL, injections volume was calculated by animal weight; (iv) Simvastatin IP injected with 200 mg/kg/day mevalonolactone in provided in drinking water; (v) sterile 0.9% saline solution, IP injected; and (vi) 0.9% saline solution IP injected with 200 mg/kg/day mevalonolactone in drinking water. Treatment was initiated at age 8 weeks for a duration of 14 days. Mice were injected and monitored daily and weighed every 3 days. Assessment of muscle strength and endurance was performed using the hanging wire assay at day 0 and at days 4, 7, 11 and 14; a strength test using a grip strength meter 1027SM (Columbus Instruments, OH, USA) on day 14; and by measuring locomotor activity in a PhenoMaster home-cage phenotyping system (TSE systems, Germany) equipped with ActiMot3, and Voluntary Running Wheel modules from day 11 to 14. At the end of day 14 mice were sacrificed by inhalation of isoflurane followed by cervical dislocation and blood and organs were collected. Mice given statins showed decreased muscle strength and endurance as assessed by wire hanging and grip force tests (Figs. 9(A)-9(B)), and a lower tendency to initiate and pursue movement as observed in total ambulation and voluntary wheel activity and maximal speed. Importantly, animals that were treated with statins and given free access to mevalonolactone- supplemented drinking water showed a greatly reduced phenotype, most prominently observed in the hanging wire experiments (Figs.9(B)-9(C)). Muscle histology of mice treated with statins with or without mevalonolactone did not show overt signs of necrosis or inflammation. This is in line with the histopathological specimens of HMGCR-LGMD patients, which did not show gross abnormalities, and with histological findings in biopsy samples of statin-related myopathy patients, which often do not show pathological features.