LINDELL MATTHEW J (US)
THALER ARNE (US)
HERRING ANDREW M (US)
KIM CHULOONG (US)
KUO MEI-CHEN (US)
GITTLEMAN CRAIG S (US)
COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES (US)
GM GLOBAL TECH OPERATIONS LLC (US)
WO2011149732A2 | 2011-12-01 |
US20090208809A1 | 2009-08-20 | |||
US20190085108A1 | 2019-03-21 | |||
US9240287B2 | 2016-01-19 | |||
US7348088B2 | 2008-03-25 | |||
US5599614A | 1997-02-04 | |||
US20130101918A1 | 2013-04-25 | |||
US7575534B2 | 2009-08-18 | |||
US8628871B2 | 2014-01-14 | |||
US6624328B1 | 2003-09-23 | |||
US7671112B2 | 2010-03-02 |
TURNER JOHN A ET AL: "DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2005 Progress Report 799 VII.B.10 Advanced Fuel Cell Membranes Based on Heteropolyacids", 1 January 2004 (2004-01-01), XP055963854, Retrieved from the Internet
HOWARD W. STARKWEATHER ET AL.: "Infrared Spectra of Amorphous and Crystalline Poly(tetrafluoroethylene", MACROMOLECULES, vol. 18, 1985, pages 1684 - 1686
CLAUDE ROCCHICCIOLI-DELTCHEFF: "Vibrational Investigations of Polyoxometalates. 2. Evidence for Anion-Anion Interactions in Molybdenum(VI) and Tungsten(VI) Compounds Related to the Keggin Structure", INORG. CHEM., vol. 22, 1983, pages 207 - 216
A.R. MOTZ ET AL.: "Heteropoly acid functionalized fluoroelastomer with outstanding chemical durability and performance for vehicular fuel cells", ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, vol. 11, no. 6, 2018, pages 1499 - 1509
S.L.-M.G. BOTELHO ET AL., JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS, vol. 354, 2008, pages 72
A. KUSOGLU ET AL., CHEM REV, vol. 117, 2017, pages 987
Y.K.S.H. DE ALMEIDA, JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, vol. 58, 1999, pages 569
J.R.T. CHALRES A. WILKIE ET AL., JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, vol. 42, 1991, pages 901 - 909
What Is Claimed Is: 1. A fluorinated ionomer (i.e., ion conducting polymer) comprising a fluorinated polymer backbone and pendent groups comprising: covalently bound heteropolyacid groups, or salts thereof; and covalently bound perfluorosulfonic acid groups, or salts thereof; wherein the perfluorosulfonic acid groups, or salts thereof, are present in an amount of at least 40 mol% of the total amount of pendent groups. 2. The fluorinated ionomer of claim 1 wherein the pendent groups comprise: 10-39 mol% covalently bound heteropolyacid groups, or salts thereof; and 61-90 mol% covalently bound perfluorosulfonic acid groups, or salts thereof; wherein the percentages are based on the total amount of pendent groups. 3. The fluorinated ionomer of any of the previous claims wherein pendent sulfonic acid groups have the structure –[O-CF2-CF(CF3)]r-O-[CF2]s-SO3Z, wherein “r” is 0 or 1, and “s” is 1 to 4, and Z is selected from the group of H, Na, K, Li, Ca, Mn, Ce, ammonium, and substituted ammonium (e.g., tetramethyl ammonium). 4. The fluorinated ionomer of any of claims 1 through 3 comprising a moiety having the structure (Formula VII): wherein: n is 0, 1, 2, or 3 (preferably, n equals 0 or 1); FG is a reactive functional group; L is a linking group; a is 0 to 80; b is 1 to 60; c is 10 to 40; r is 0 or 1; s is 1 to 4; each Z is independently selected from the group of H, Na, K, Li, Ca, Mn, Ce, ammonium, and substituted ammonium (e.g., tetramethyl ammonium); each X is independently a non-metal heteroatom; each M is independently a transition metal; q is 2 to 30; x is 1 to 3; y is 5 to 25; and z is 20 to 130. 5. The fluorinated ionomer of claim 4 wherein the pendent heteropolyacid groups, or salts thereof, are covalently bound to the fluorinated polymer backbone through a phosphorus-containing functional entity. 6. The fluorinated ionomer of claim 5 wherein the phosphorus-containing functional entity is selected from the group of a phosphate, phosphonate, phosphinate, phosphonite, phosphine, and combinations thereof. 7. The fluorinated ionomer of claim 6 wherein the moiety has the following structure (Formula IX): wherein: a is 0 to 80; b is 1 to 60; c is 10 to 40; r is 0 or 1; s is 1 to 4; each Z is independently selected from the group of H, Na, K, Li, Ca, Mn, Ce, ammonium, and substituted ammonium (e.g., tetramethyl ammonium); each X is independently a non-metal heteroatom; each M is independently a transition metal; q is 2 to 30; x is 1 to 3; y is 5 to 25; and z is 20 to 130. 8. The fluorinated ionomer of any of the previous claims having a weight average molecular weight of at least 50,000 grams/mole. 9. A polymer electrolyte membrane comprising the fluorinated ionomer of any of the previous claims. 10. The polymer electrolyte membrane of claim 9 which is a proton exchange membrane. 11. The polymer electrolyte membrane of claim 9 or 10 having a thickness of up to 20 micrometers. 12. A fuel cell comprising the polymer electrolyte membrane of any of claims 9 through 11. 13. A method of making the fluorinated ionomer of any of claims 1 through 8, the method comprising: providing a precursor polymer comprising vinylidene fluoride monomeric units, tetrafluoroethylene monomeric units, and trifluoroethylene monomeric units with pendent groups comprising covalently bound perfluorosulfonyl fluoride groups; hydrolyzing the perfluorosulfonyl fluoride groups to form covalently bound perfluorosulfonate salt groups; optionally ion exchanging the perfluorosulfonate groups to form perfluorosulfonic acid groups; attaching a functional entity (FG-L) to the precursor polymer; and attaching a lacunary heteropolyacid, or salt thereof, to form covalently bound heteropolyacid groups, or salts thereof to the functional entity. 14. The method of claim 13 wherein hydrolyzing the perfluorosulfonyl fluoride groups occurs at the same time as attaching the functional entity (FG-L). 15. The method of claim 13 wherein hydrolyzing and acidifying the perfluorosulfonyl fluoride groups occurs before attaching the functional entity (FG-L). |
wherein “n” is 0, 1, 2, or 3. Preferably, n equals 0 or 1. Thus, the heteropolyacid group, or salt thereof (represented by the circle), can be covalently bonded to one or more precursor polymers through one or more functional entities (FG-L), wherein FG is a reactive functional group and L is a linking group, as described above. In Formula VII, the fluorinated polymer backbone comprises -CF 2 -CH- monomeric units (the “b” units) with pendent groups, tetrafluoroethylene monomeric units (-CF 2 -CF 2 -) (the “a” units), and trifluoroethylene monomeric units (-CF2-CF-) (the “c” units) with pendent groups. These monomeric units are randomly distributed throughout the backbone of the polymer. In Formula VII: a is 0 to 80; b is 1 to 60; c is 10 to 40; r is 0 or 1; s is 1 to 4; each Z is independently selected from the group of H, Na, K, Li, Ca, Mn, Ce, ammonium, and substituted ammonium (e.g., tetramethyl ammonium); each X is independently a non-metal heteroatom; each M is independently a transition metal; O is oxygen; q is 2 to 30; x is 1 to 3; y is 5 to 25; and z is 20 to 130. In certain embodiments, the pendent heteropolyacid groups, or salts thereof, are covalently bound to the fluorinated polymer backbone, preferably to -CF 2 -CH- monomeric units, through a phosphorus-containing functional entity having the general chemical formula (Formula VIII): (O═)tP(OR)u(L)v as described above (Formula VI). In certain embodiments, the phosphorus-containing functional entity is selected from the group of a phosphate, phosphonate, phosphinate, phosphonite, phosphine, and combinations thereof. In certain embodiments, the heteropolyacid groups are covalently bound to the fluorinated polymer backbone through an oxyphenyl phosphonate group. In certain embodiments, the fluorinated ionomer includes a moiety having the following structure (Formula IX): wherein: a is 0 to 80; b is 1 to 60; c is 10 to 40; r is 0 or 1; s is 1 to 4; each Z is independently selected from the group of H, Na, K, Li, Ca, Mn, Ce, ammonium, and substituted ammonium (e.g., tetramethyl ammonium); each X is independently a non-metal heteroatom; each M is independently a transition metal; O is oxygen; q is 2 to 30; x is 1 to 3, y is 5 to 25, and z is 20 to 130. Although such repeat units of Formulas VII and IX are typically the same, they do not need to be. For example, one could use both the 3M monomer CF2=CF-OC4F8SO2F or the ‘Nafion monomer’ CF 2 =CF-OCF 2 CF(CF 3 )OC 2 F 4 SO 2 F in the same polymer. In other words, repeat units wherein r = 0 and s = 4 can be mixed with repeat units wherein r = 1 and s = 2 In certain embodiments of Formulas VII and IX, a is 40 to 80. In certain embodiments of Formulas VII and IX, a is 59 to 76. In certain embodiments of Formulas VII and IX, b is 1 to 30. In certain embodiments of Formulas VII and IX, b is 5 to 15. In certain embodiments of Formulas VII and IX, c is 15 to 25. In certain embodiments of Formulas VII and IX, a+b+c is 100. In certain embodiments of Formulas VII and IX, r is 1. In certain embodiments of Formulas VII and IX, r is 0. In certain embodiments of Formulas VII and IX, s is 4. In certain embodiments of Formulas VII and IX, each M is independently selected from the group of tungsten, molybdenum, vanadium, tantalum, niobium, manganese, and cerium. In certain embodiments of Formulas VII and IX, each X is independently selected from the group of Groups 13 (Boron group), 14 (Carbon group), 15 (Nitrogen group), 16 (Oxygen group) of the Periodic Table. In certain embodiments of Formulas VII and IX, each X is independently selected from the group of silicon, phosphorus, and arsenic. In certain embodiments of Formulas VII and IX, each Z is independently selected from the group of H, Na, K, and Li. In certain embodiments, the fluorinated ionomer includes a unit having the following structure (Formula X): wherein: a is 25 to 80; b is 1 to 45; c is 10 to 30. In certain embodiments of Formula X, a is 59 to 76. In certain embodiments of Formula X, b is 5 to 15. In certain embodiments of Formula X, c is 15 to 25. In certain embodiments, the fluorinated ionomer described herein has a weight average molecular weight of at least 50,000 grams/mole. In certain embodiments, the fluorinated ionomer has a weight average molecular weight of at least 100,000 grams/mole. There is no limit on the maximum molecular weight. The procedure for determining the weight average molecular weight is based on melt flow index measurements (MFI) as described in ASTM D 1238. Molecular weights are estimated from the relationship of (MFI) -1 = K*MW ~3.5 where K is an empirically derived constant. Methods of Making Polymer Ionomers Methods of the present disclosure include a method of making the fluorinated ionomer described herein. The method includes: providing a precursor polymer comprising vinylidene fluoride monomeric units, tetrafluoroethylene monomeric units, and trifluoroethylene monomeric units with pendent groups comprising covalently bound perfluorosulfonyl fluoride groups; hydrolyzing the perfluorosulfonyl fluoride groups to form covalently bound perfluorosulfonate salt groups; optionally ion exchanging the perfluorosulfonate groups to form perfluorosulfonic acid groups; attaching a functional entity (FG-L) to the precursor polymer; and attaching a lacunary heteropolyacid, or salt thereof, to the functional entity to form covalently bound heteropolyacid groups, or salts thereof. In one embodiment, hydrolyzing the perfluorosulfonyl fluoride groups occurs at the same time as attaching the functional entity (FG-L). The heteropolyacid, or salt thereof, is subsequently covalently bound to the functional entity, as shown in Scheme I. Scheme I Alternatively, hydrolyzing the perfluorosulfonyl fluoride groups occurs before attaching the functional entity. The heteropolyacid, or salt thereof, is subsequently covalently bound to the functional entity, as shown in Scheme II. Scheme II The steps of hydrolyzing and acidifying use standard reagents and conditions that are well-known to those of skill in the art, as demonstrated in the Examples Section. The step of attaching a lacunary heteropolyacid, or salt thereof, using a functional entity (FG-L) as described above uses standard reagents and conditions that are well-known to those of skill in the art, as demonstrated in the Examples Section. Articles The articles of the present disclosure include a polymer electrolyte membrane (particularly, cation exchange membrane such as proton exchange membrane (PEM)), that includes the fluorinated ionomer as described herein, as well as a fuel cell that includes the polymer electrolyte membrane. In some embodiments, the ionomer of the present disclosure may be useful for making a polymer electrolyte membrane using any suitable method. Typically, a membrane is cast from a fluoropolymer dispersion and then dried, annealed, or both. The ionomer may be cast from a suspension. Any suitable casting method may be used, including bar coating, spray coating, slit coating, and brush coating. After forming, the membrane may be annealed, typically at a temperature of 120˚C or higher, more typically 130˚C or higher, most typically 150˚C or higher. Typically, if the fluoropolymer dispersion is to be used to form a membrane, the concentration of ionomer is advantageously high (e.g., at least 20, 30, or 40 percent by weight). Often a water-miscible organic solvent is added to facilitate film formation. Examples of water- miscible solvents include lower alcohols (e.g., methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, n-propanol), polyols (e.g., ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol), ethers (e.g., tetrahydrofuran and dioxane), ether acetates, acetonitrile, acetone, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), N,N- dimethylacetamide (DMA), ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, dimethylcarbonate, diethylcarbonate, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), N-methylpyrrolidinone (NMP), dimethylimidazolidinone, butyrolactone, hexamethylphosphoric triamide (HMPT), isobutyl methyl ketone, sulfolane, and combinations thereof. In certain preferred embodiments, the ionomer of the present disclosure may be useful as a PEM and/or useful for making a membrane or catalyst ink composition. In some embodiments, the ionomer described herein can be fabricated into membranes using common methods such as solvent casting as described in U.S. Pat. No.7,348,088 (Hamrock et al.). The ionomer is converted into a suspension or solution for casting. Any suitable carrier or solvent may be used, typically including water. The membrane is cast onto a liner or carrier or other surface by any suitable method including bar coating, spray coating, slit coating, transfer roll coating, and the like. The casting is typically dried followed by a higher temperature annealing step. The cast film is removed from the casting surface prior to use. In some embodiments, the membranes can be fabricated to include a mechanical reinforcement such as expanded poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (ePTFE) as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,599,614 (Bahar et al.). Alternatively, an electrospun nanofiber may be used, as described in U.S. Pat. Pub. No.2013/0101918 (Yandrasits et al.). In certain embodiments, the ionomer (e.g., as a component of the fluoropolymer dispersion) can be combined with catalyst particles (e.g., metal particles or carbon-supported metal particles). A variety of catalysts may be useful. Typically, carbon-supported catalyst particles are used. Typical carbon-supported catalyst particles are 30% to 95% carbon and 5% to 70% catalyst metal by weight, the catalyst metal typically comprising platinum for the cathode and platinum or platinum and ruthenium in a weight ratio of 2:1 for the anode. However, other metals may be useful, for example, gold, silver, palladium, iridium, rhodium, iron, cobalt, nickel, chromium, tungsten, manganese, vanadium, and alloys thereof. To make a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) or catalyst coated membrane (CCM), catalyst may be applied to the PEM by any suitable means, including both hand and machine methods, including hand brushing, notch bar coating, fluid bearing die coating, wire-wound rod coating, slot-fed knife coating, three-roll coating, or decal transfer. Coating may be achieved in one application or in multiple applications. Advantageously, ionomers according to the present disclosure may be useful for making a catalyst layer with one coating application. The catalyst ink may be applied to a PEM or a gas diffusion layer (GDL) directly, or the catalyst ink may be applied to a transfer substrate, dried, and thereafter applied to the PEM or to the GDL as a decal. In some embodiments, the catalyst ink includes the ionomer disclosed herein at a concentration of at least 10, 15, or 20 percent by weight and up to 30 percent by weight, based on the total weight of the catalyst ink. In some embodiments, the catalyst ink includes the catalyst particles in an amount of at least 10, 15, or 20 percent by weight and up to 50, 40, or 30 percent by weight, based on the total weight of the catalyst ink. The catalyst particles may be added to the fluoropolymer dispersion made as described above in any of its embodiments. The resulting catalyst ink may be mixed, for example, with heating. The percent solids in the catalyst ink may be selected, for example, to obtain desirable rheological properties. Examples of suitable organic solvents useful for including in the catalyst ink include lower alcohols (e.g., methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, n-propanol), polyols (e.g., ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol), ethers (e.g., tetrahydrofuran and dioxane), diglyme, polyglycol ethers, ether acetates, acetonitrile, acetone, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), N,N dimethylacetamide (DMA), ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, dimethylcarbonate, diethylcarbonate, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), N-methylpyrrolidinone (NMP), dimethylimidazolidinone, butyrolactone, hexamethylphosphoric triamide (HMPT), isobutyl methyl ketone, sulfolane, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the catalyst ink contains 0% to 50% by weight of a lower alcohol and 0% to 20% by weight of a polyol. In addition, the ink may contain 0% to 2% of a suitable dispersant. In some embodiments of the polymer electrolyte membrane of the present disclosure, a salt of at least one of cerium, manganese, or ruthenium, or one or more cerium oxide or zirconium oxide compounds is added to the acid form of the ionomer before membrane formation. Typically, the salt of cerium, manganese, or ruthenium, and/or the cerium or zirconium oxide compound is mixed well with or dissolved within the ionomer to achieve substantially uniform distribution. The salt of cerium, manganese, or ruthenium may comprise any suitable anion, including chloride, bromide, hydroxide, nitrate, sulfonate, acetate, phosphate, and carbonate. More than one anion may be present. Other salts may be present, including salts that include other metal cations, ammonium, or substituted ammonium (e.g., tetramethyl ammonium) cations. Once cation exchange occurs between the transition metal salt and the acid form of the ionomer, it may be desirable for the acid formed by combination of the liberated proton and the original salt anion to be removed. Thus, it may be useful to use anions that generate volatile or soluble acids, for example chloride or nitrate. Manganese cations may be in any suitable oxidation state, including Mn 2+ , Mn 3+ , and Mn 4+ , but are most typically Mn 2+ . Ruthenium cations may be in any suitable oxidation state, including Ru 3+ and Ru 4+ , but are most typically Ru 3+ . Cerium cations may be in any suitable oxidation state, including Ce 3+ and Ce 4+ . Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the cerium, manganese, or ruthenium cations persist in the polymer electrolyte because they are exchanged with H+ ions from the anion groups of the polymer electrolyte and become associated with those anion groups. Furthermore, it is believed that polyvalent cerium, manganese, or ruthenium cations may form ionic crosslinks between anion groups of the polymer electrolyte, further adding to the stability of the polymer. In some embodiments, the salt may be present in solid form. The cations may be present in a combination of two or more forms including solvated cation, cation associated with bound anion groups of the polymer electrolyte membrane, and cation bound in a salt precipitate. The amount of salt added is typically between 0.001 and 0.5 charge equivalents based on the molar amount of acid functional groups present in the polymer electrolyte, more typically between 0.005 and 0.2, more typically between 0.01 and 0.1, and more typically between 0.02 and 0.05. Further details for combining an anionic copolymer with cerium, manganese, or ruthenium cations can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos.7,575,534 (Frey et al.) and 8,628,871 (Frey et al.). Membrane thickness can range from 5 to 500 micrometers in thickness. The polymer electrolyte membrane, in some embodiments, may have a thickness of up to 90 micrometers, up to 60 micrometers, up to 30 micrometers, or up to 20 micrometers. A thinner membrane may provide less resistance to the passage of ions. In fuel cell use, this results in cooler operation and greater output of usable energy. In some embodiments, the heteropolyacid-functionalized fluorinated ionomer of the present disclosure may be blended, e.g., in an amount of 5-50 wt-%, with a non-heteropolyacid- functionalized fluorinated ionomer. Such blend may be formed into a membrane. In some embodiments, the heteropolyacid-functionalized fluorinated ionomer of the present disclosure may be imbibed into a porous supporting matrix, typically in the form of a thin membrane having a thickness of up to 90 micrometers, up to 60 micrometers, up to 30 micrometers, or up to 20 micrometers. Any suitable method of imbibing the ionomer into the pores of the supporting matrix may be used, including overpressure, vacuum, wicking, and immersion. Any suitable supporting matrix may be used. Typically, the supporting matrix is electrically non-conductive. Typically, the supporting matrix is composed of a fluoropolymer, which is more typically perfluorinated. Typical matrices include porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), such as biaxially stretched PTFE webs. In another embodiment fillers (e.g., fibers) might be added to the polymer to reinforce the membrane. To make an MEA, GDL's may be applied to either side of a CCM by any suitable means. Any suitable GDL may be used in the practice of the present disclosure. Typically, the GDL is comprised of sheet material comprising carbon fibers. Typically, the GDL is a carbon fiber construction selected from woven and non-woven carbon fiber constructions. Carbon fiber constructions which may be useful in the practice of the present disclosure may include TORAY Carbon Paper, SPECTRACARB Carbon Paper, AFNTM non-woven carbon cloth, and ZOLTEK Carbon Cloth. The GDL may be coated or impregnated with various materials, including carbon particle coatings, hydrophilizing treatments, and hydrophobizing treatments such as coating with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). In use, the MEA according to the present disclosure is typically sandwiched between two rigid plates, known as distribution plates, also known as bipolar plates (BPP’s) or monopolar plates. Like the GDL, the distribution plate is typically electrically conductive. The distribution plate is typically made of a carbon composite, metal, or plated metal material. The distribution plate distributes reactant or product fluids to and from the MEA electrode surfaces, typically through one or more fluid-conducting channels engraved, milled, molded or stamped in the surface(s) facing the MEA(s). These channels are sometimes designated a flow field. The distribution plate may distribute fluids to and from two consecutive MEA's in a stack, with one face directing fuel to the anode of the first MEA while the other face directs oxidant to the cathode of the next MEA (and removes product water), hence the term “bipolar plate.” Alternately, the distribution plate may have channels on one side only, to distribute fluids to or from an MEA on only that side, which plate may be termed a “monopolar plate.” A typical fuel cell stack comprises a number of MEA's stacked alternately with bipolar plates. EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS Embodiment 1 is a fluorinated ionomer (i.e., ion conducting polymer) comprising a fluorinated polymer backbone and pendent groups comprising: covalently bound heteropolyacid groups, or salts thereof; and covalently bound perfluorosulfonic acid groups, or salts thereof; wherein the perfluorosulfonic acid groups are present in an amount of at least 40 mol% of the total amount of pendent groups. Embodiment 2 is the fluorinated ionomer of embodiment 1 wherein the pendent groups comprise: 10-39 mol% covalently bound heteropolyacid groups, or salts thereof; and 61-90 mol% covalently bound perfluorosulfonic acid groups, or salts thereof; wherein the percentages are based on the total amount of pendent groups. Embodiment 3 is the fluorinated ionomer of embodiment 1 or 2 wherein the pendent heteropolyacid groups, or salts thereof, are derived from a heteropolyacid, or salt thereof, having the following general structure (Formula II): Z q + [X x M y O z ] q- wherein: each Z is independently selected from the group of H, Na, K, Li, Ca, Mn, Ce, ammonium, and substituted ammonium (e.g., tetramethyl ammonium); each X is independently a non-metal heteroatom; each M is independently a transition metal; O is oxygen; q is 2 to 30; x is 1 to 3; y is 5 to 25; and z is 20 to 130. Embodiment 4 is the fluorinated ionomer of embodiment 3 wherein the pendent heteropolyacid groups, or salts thereof, are derived from a heteropolyacid having a lacunary structure. Embodiment 5 is the fluorinated ionomer of any of the previous embodiments wherein pendent sulfonic acid groups, or salts thereof, have the structure (Formula III) –[O-CF2- CF(CF 3 )] r -O-[CF 2 ] s -SO 3 Z wherein “r” is 0 or 1, and “s” is 1 to 4, and Z is selected from the group of H, Na, K, Li, Ca, Mn, Ce, ammonium, and substituted ammonium (e.g., tetramethyl ammonium). Embodiment 6 is the fluorinated ionomer of any of the previous embodiments wherein the pendent heteropolyacid groups, or salts thereof, are covalently bound to the fluorinated polymer backbone through a functional entity. Embodiment 7 is the fluorinated ionomer of embodiment 6 wherein the pendent heteropolyacid groups are covalently bound to the fluorinated polymer backbone through a phosphorus-containing functional entity. Embodiment 8 is the fluorinated ionomer of embodiment 7 wherein the phosphorus- containing functional entity is selected from the group of a phosphate, phosphonate, phosphinate, phosphonite, phosphine, and combinations thereof. Embodiment 9 is the fluorinated ionomer of embodiment 8 wherein the heteropolyacid groups are covalently bound to the fluorinated polymer backbone through an oxyphenyl phosphonate group. Embodiment 10 is the fluorinated ionomer of any of the previous embodiments wherein the fluorinated polymer backbone comprises -CF2-CH- monomeric units (with pendent groups), trifluoroethylene monomeric units (with pendent groups), and tetrafluoroethylene monomeric units. Embodiment 11 is the fluorinated ionomer of embodiment 10 wherein the pendent heteropolyacid groups are covalently bound to -CF 2 -CH- monomeric units through a phosphorus-containing functional entity. Embodiment 12 is the fluorinated ionomer of embodiment 11 comprising a moiety having the structure (Formula VII): wherein: n is 0, 1, 2, or 3 (preferably, n equals 0 or 1); FG is a reactive functional group; L is a linking group; a is 0 to 80; b is 1 to 60; c is 10 to 40; r is 0 or 1; s is 1 to 4; each Z is independently selected from the group of H, Na, K, Li, Ca, Mn, Ce, ammonium, and substituted ammonium (e.g., tetramethyl ammonium); each X is independently a non-metal heteroatom; each M is independently a transition metal; q is 2 to 30; x is 1 to 3; y is 5 to 25; and z is 20 to 130. Embodiment 13 is the fluorinated ionomer of embodiment 12 wherein the moiety has the following structure (Formula IX): wherein: a is 0 to 80; b is 1 to 60; c is 10 to 40; r is 0 or 1; s is 1 to 4; each Z is independently selected from the group of H, Na, K, Li, Ca, Mn, Ce, ammonium, and substituted ammonium (e.g., tetramethyl ammonium); each X is independently a non-metal heteroatom; each M is independently a transition metal; q is 2 to 30; x is 1 to 3; y is 5 to 25; and z is 20 to 130. Embodiment 14 is the fluorinated ionomer of embodiment 12 or 13 wherein a is 40 to 80 or 59 to 76. Embodiment 15 is the fluorinated ionomer of any of embodiments 12 through 14 wherein b is 1 to 30 or 5 to 15. Embodiment 16 is the fluorinated ionomer of any of embodiments 12 through 15 wherein c is 15 to 25. Embodiment 17 is the fluorinated ionomer of any of embodiments 12 through 16 wherein r is 1. Embodiment 18 is the fluorinated ionomer of any of embodiments 12 through 16 wherein r is 0. Embodiment 19 is the fluorinated ionomer of any of embodiments 12 through 18 wherein s is 4. Embodiment 20 is the fluorinated ionomer of any of embodiments 12 through 19 wherein each M is independently selected from the group of tungsten, molybdenum, vanadium, tantalum, niobium, manganese, and cerium. Embodiment 21 is the fluorinated ionomer of any of embodiments 12 through 20 wherein each X is independently selected from the group of Groups 13 (Boron group), 14 (Carbon group), 15 (Nitrogen group), 16 (Oxygen group) of the Periodic Table. In certain embodiments, each X is independently selected from the group of silicon, phosphorus, and arsenic. Embodiment 22 is the fluorinated ionomer of any of embodiments 12 through 19 wherein each Z is independently selected from the group of H, Na, K, and Li. Embodiment 23 is the fluorinated ionomer of any of embodiments 12 through 22 wherein the moiety has the following structure (Formula X):
wherein a is 25 to 80, b is 1 to 45, and c is 10 to 30. Embodiment 24 is the fluorinated ionomer of embodiment 23 wherein a is 59 to 76, b is 5 to 15, and c is 15 to 25. Embodiment 25 is the fluorinated ionomer of any of the previous embodiments having a weight average molecular weight of at least 50,000 grams/mole. Embodiment 26 is the fluorinated ionomer of embodiment 25 having a weight average molecular weight of at least 100,000 grams/mole. Embodiment 27 is a fluoropolymer dispersion comprising the fluorinated ionomer of any of embodiments 1 through 26. Embodiment 28 is a polymer electrolyte membrane comprising the fluorinated ionomer of any of embodiments 1 through 26. Embodiment 29 is the polymer electrolyte membrane of embodiment 28 having a thickness of 5 to 500 micrometers in thickness. Embodiment 30 is the polymer electrolyte membrane of embodiment 28 or 29 having a thickness of up to 90 micrometers, up to 60 micrometers, up to 30 micrometers, or up to 20 micrometers. Embodiment 31 is the polymer electrolyte membrane of any of embodiments 28 through 30 wherein the fluorinated ionomer is imbibed into a porous supporting matrix. Embodiment 32 is the polymer electrolyte membrane of embodiment 31 wherein the porous supporting matrix is electrically non-conductive. Embodiment 33 is the polymer electrolyte membrane of embodiment 32 wherein the porous supporting matrix comprises a fluoropolymer. Embodiment 34 is the polymer electrolyte membrane of embodiment 33 wherein the porous supporting matrix comprises a perfluorinated fluoropolymer. Embodiment 35 is the polymer electrolyte membrane of any of embodiments 28 through 30 wherein the heteropolyacid-functionalized fluorinated ionomer (e.g., 5-50 wt-%) is blended with a non-heteropolyacid-functionalized fluorinated ionomer. Embodiment 36 is a fuel cell comprising the polymer electrolyte membrane of any one of embodiments 28 through 35. Embodiment 37 is a method of making the fluorinated ionomer of any of embodiments 1 through 26, the method comprising: providing a precursor polymer comprising vinylidene fluoride monomeric units, tetrafluoroethylene monomeric units, and trifluoroethylene monomeric units with pendent groups comprising covalently bound perfluorosulfonyl fluoride groups; hydrolyzing the perfluorosulfonyl fluoride groups to form covalently bound perfluorosulfonate salt groups; optionally ion exchanging the perfluorosulfonate groups to form perfluorosulfonic acid groups; attaching a functional entity (FG-L) to the precursor polymer; and attaching a lacunary heteropolyacid, or salt thereof, to form covalently bound heteropolyacid groups, or salts thereof to the functional entity. Embodiment 38 is the method of embodiment 37 wherein hydrolyzing the perfluorosulfonyl fluoride groups occurs at the same time as attaching the functional entity (FG- L), and the heteropolyacid, or salt thereof, is subsequently covalently bound to the functional entity, as shown in Scheme I:
Scheme I Embodiment 39 is the method of embodiment 37 wherein hydrolyzing the perfluorosulfonyl fluoride groups occurs before attaching the functional entity, and the heteropolyacid, or salt thereof, is subsequently covalently bound to the functional entity, as shown in Scheme II: Scheme II EXAMPLES These Examples are merely for illustrative purposes and are not meant to be overly limiting on the scope of the appended claims. Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the present disclosure are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques. Unless otherwise noted, all parts, percentages, ratios, etc. in the examples and the rest of the specification are by weight, and all reagents used in the examples were obtained, or are available, from general chemical suppliers, or may be synthesized by conventional methods. Materials Used in the Examples
Preparatory Example 1 (PE-1): TFE/VDF/MV4S polymer The sulfonyl fluoride containing monomer; F2C=CF-O-CF2CF2CF2CF2SO2F (designated MV4S) was prepared according to the method described in U.S. Pat. No.6,624,328 (Guerra). A 4-L polymerization kettle equipped with an impeller agitator system was charged with ammonium oxalate monohydrate (5 grams (g)) and oxalic acid dihydrate (1 g) in H2O (2000 g) and 40 g of a 30 weight percent (wt-% or w/w) aqueous solution of CF 3 -O-(CF 2 ) 3 -O-CFH-CF 2 - COONH 4 , prepared as described in “Preparation of Compound 11” in U.S. Pat. No.7,671,112. The kettle was degassed and subsequently charged with nitrogen several times to assure that all of oxygen was removed. Afterwards, the kettle was purged with TFE. The kettle was then heated to 50°C and the agitation system was set to 320 rpm. A mixture of 193 g MV4S, 126 g deionized water and 6.5 g of a 30 wt-% solution of CF3-O-(CF2)3-O-CFH-CF2-COONH4 were emulsified under high shear by an agitator available under the trade designation ULTRA-TURRAX agitator operated at 24000 revolutions per minute (rpm) for 3 minutes. The MV4S emulsion was charged into the reaction kettle. The kettle was further charged with vinylidene fluoride monomer (VDF) (6 g) and 114 g of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) to a pressure of 6 bar (600 kPa). The polymerization was initiated by a 0.02% solution of KMnO 4 (19 g) in deionized water. As the reaction started, the reaction temperature of 50°C as well as the reaction pressure of 6 bar (600 kPa) were maintained by feeding TFE and VDF into the gas phase. After the first pressure drop, the continuous feeding of the MV4S emulsion (in total 887 g; 526 g MV4S and 18 g of the 30 wt-% solution of CF3-O-(CF2)3-O-CFH-CF2-COONH4 in 343 g deionized water), TFE (551 g), VDF (69 g) and a solution of 0.02 % KMnO4 in deionized water (232 g) was continuously added. The average metering rate of the continuous addition of the 0.02 % KMnO4 solution was 65 grams per hour (g/h) to obtain a polymer dispersion with a solid content of 31.5 %. The polymerization time was 222 minutes (min). The coagulated and washed polymer had an MFI (265°C/5 kilograms (kg)) of 8.7 g/10 min. The so-obtained polymer showed a chemical composition of 67 mol% TFE, 15 mol% MV4S and 18 mol% VDF as obtained by solid state 19 F-NMR-spectroscopy. Preparatory Examples 2-5 (PE-2 through PE-5) were synthesized using the method of Preparatory Example 1 (PE-1). The ratio of monomers was varied as indicated in the following table. In calculating the mole percentages of the pendent HPA and perfluorosulfonic acid/salt groups, for an HPA group, or salt thereof, the number of protons or salts thereof included in any one HPA group can vary from 2-30 (value of “q”), however, the number of pendent HPA groups is used for the calculation of mole percentages. Comparative Preparatory Example 1 (CPE-1): Sulfonyl fluoride hydrolysis with strong base A film was hot pressed from several grams of PE-1 polymer between two sheets of 2 mil (0.05 millimeter (mm)) Kapton to form a film 240-370 micrometers thick. From the film were cut 8 strips approximately 1 centimeter (cm) x 3 cm and each was placed into a separate 4 milliliter (mL) glass vial. The film strips were then each subjected to 4 mL 1.0 M NaOH (aq) in 50/50 MeOH/H2O (w/w). The capped vials were placed in a 50°C aluminum heating block (Techne DriBlock DB200/3) and reaction was run for 1, 2, 3, and 24 hours, removing one vial at each designated treatment time. Upon removal from the heating block, the reaction solution was decanted, and films were washed three times with 4 mL deionized water followed by a 4 mL 1.0 M HCl(aq) soak overnight. The films were then washed with deionized (DI) H2O until neutral pH was obtained and subjected to a 4 mL NaCl (aq) brine soak for 1-2 hours. If after 1 hour the pH was acidic, the film was washed with two 4 mL deionized water aliquots and subjected to another 1-hour brine soak and pH was measured again. This process was repeated until neutral pH after 1 hour was achieved. The film was finally washed with three 4 mL deionized water aliquots, blotted dry, and vacuum dried at 50°C overnight. Samples were analyzed by ATR-IR to assess degree of hydrolysis and to observe extent of sulfonyl fluoride hydrolysis and main chain dehydrofluorination of VDF units. Figure 2 shows the loss of the 1465 cm -1 peak and the formation of the 1060 cm -1 peak, indicating the sulfonyl fluoride is hydrolyzed to sodium sulfonate. The formation of a peak at 1720 cm -1 shows dehydrofluorination to form the undesired -CF=CH- unit in the polymer backbone. Preparatory Example 6 (PE-6): Sulfonyl fluoride hydrolysis with mild base The process described in Comparative Preparatory Example 1 (CPE-1) was used with 0.5 Molar (M) ammonium carbonate instead of 1.0 M NaOH. All other conditions and wash steps were the same. Figure 3 shows the loss of the 1465 cm -1 peak and the formation of the 1060 cm -1 peak, indicating the sulfonyl fluoride is hydrolyzed to sulfonate. The absence of the peak at 1720 cm -1 shows no detectable dehydrofluorination occurred in this sample. Preparatory Example 7 (PE-7) Lacunary heteropoly acid (HPA, K8SiW11O39) was synthesized using the method below: Sodium metasilicate (Na2SiO3, SiO2; 44-47 %, 11.82 g, 50 millimoles (mmol)) was dissolved in 100 mL of DI water at room temperature with magnetic stirring (if the solution was not completely clear, it needed to be filtered) (Solution A). In a 1-L beaker, sodium tungstate (Na2WO4.2H2O, 182 g, 0.55 mol) was dissolved in 300 mL of boiling water (Solution B) with magnetic stirring. To the boiling Solution B, an aqueous solution of 4 M HCl (165 mL) was added dropwise in ca.30 min, with vigorous stirring to dissolve the local precipitate of tungstic acid. Solution A was quickly added, then 50 mL of aqueous solution of 4 M HCl was added, too. The pH was ca.5 to 6. The reaction mixture was kept boiling for 1 hour. During the boiling, kept the pH ca.5 to 6 by adding small amount of aqueous solution of 4 M HCl. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was filtered on a filter funnel. Potassium chloride (150 g) was added to the clear filtrate with stirring at room temperature. The white solid product was collected on a fritted glass funnel (medium porosity), washed with cold 1 M KCl solution (2 x 50 mL), then washed with ice-cold DI water (2 x 50 mL), and dried in air. Yield 140.5 g (87.1 %). Material Synthesis Identical methods to chemically immobilize HPA to TFE-MV4S-VDF ionomer were used but with different amount of HPAs and functionalization-related solvents. Functionalization of representative sample PE-1 will be used to describe the synthesis. Preparatory Example X-1 (PE:X-1): Diethyl (4-hydroxyphenyl) phosphonate (DHPP) grafted onto PE-1 10.46 g of PE-1 (12.99 mmol) was suspended in DMAc (150 mL) at 45°C. 28.96 mmol of 0.1 M NaOH in i-PrOH, was slowly added to the reaction mixture day by day. Day 1: Added 0.1 M NaOH in i-PrOH (100 mL, 10 mmol) to the polymer mixture and stirred at 45°C overnight. Day 2: Added more 0.1 M NaOH in i-PrOH (40 mL, 4 mmol) to the yellow-orange mixture that contained white solid and stirred at 45°C overnight. Day 3: Orange cloudy mixture contained less white solid.1.25 equivalent of DHPP (based on vinylidene fluoride content) in 1 M KOH in MeOH was added to the polymer mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred at 45°C for 2 hours. The yellow-orange mixture contained white solid. Next, 0.1 M NaOH in i-PrOH (10 mL, 1 mmol) was added and stirred at 45°C overnight. Total base used was 15 mmol. Day 4: Orange clear reaction mixture was formed. The reaction mixture was precipitated in 1.2 M HCl (aq) (750 mL). The yellow solid was collected on the fritted funnel (coarse size), then rinsed with DI water until pH of about 6 on pH testing paper. The yellow solid was dried in air first and then dried under vacuum for 48 h at 40°C, producing phenol phosphonic ester functionalized PE-1 (PE-1/DHPP = PE:X-1). Yield: 88 % (yellow solid) (MCK-12-53A). 31 P NMR (162 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δ = 16.2(s) ppm. Preparatory Example XY-1 (PE:XY-1): Hydrolysis of phosphonate was conducted to covalently attach HPA to PE:X-1 PE:X-1 (PE-1/DHPP) (9.2 g) was suspended in dry acetonitrile (200 mL) under ultrahigh purity nitrogen at room temperature. Then the polymer mixture was cooled to 0°C. Bromotrimethylsilane (10 mL, 11.24 g, 73.5 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture under N2(g) at room temperature. The reaction was heated gradually to 50°C and allowed to react for 22 hours under stirring without N2(g) purging. The reaction mixture was cooled down to room temperature, then quenched in methanol (300 mL) contained 10 vol % of conc. HCl. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 hours. The polymer mixture was decanted, and the pale-yellow gel was isolated, dried in air, washed with water until about 6 on pH testing paper, dried in air first, and dried under vacuum for 48 hours. Yield: 91 % (pale yellow solid) (MCK-12-58A). 31 P NMR (162 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δ = 11.5 (s) ppm. Example 1 (EX-1): Covalent attachment of lacunary HPA to starting material PE: XY-1 Material from Preparatory Example PE: XY-1 (PE-1/DHPPA) (5.06 g) was suspended in DMAc (100 mL) at room temperature overnight. HPA (K8SiW11O39, 3.65 g, 1.131 mmol, 1 equiv.) was added to the homogeneous polymer solution at room temperature. The cloudy mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 minutes. Concentrated HCl (12 M, 0.565 mL, 6 equiv.) was added dropwise to the reaction mixture at room temperature. Then the reaction mixture was stirred at 80°C for 3 days. The samples then went through KCl removal and acid- exchange. To remove the unwanted KCl crystals, the solution was centrifuged for 20 minutes at 4,500 RPM and decanted from the KCl solids. The non-precipitated solution was used to either blend with 3M PFSA or casted by itself. After the casting of membrane, it was acid-exchanged by washing with 4 M sulfuric acid at room temperature followed by multiple DI water rinses. The polymer mixture without filtration was drop-casted on a TEFLON plate and evaporated in air for 2 days. Preparatory Examples X-2 through X-4 and Prophetic Example X-5 Additional preparatory examples were made using the methods described in preparatory example PE: X-1. The amount of base and DHPP were changed based on the vinylidene fluoride content of the precursor polymer. Preparatory Examples XY-2 through XY-4 and Prophetic Example XY-5 Hydrolysis of the DHPP was completed following the methods of PE: XY-1 using the tabulated quantities below. *Prophetic example with values extrapolated from the working examples. Examples 2-4 and Prophectic Example 5 The heteropoly acid was attached to the preparatory example precoursors PE:XY-2 through XY-4 using the methods described in Example 1. * Prophetic example with values extrapolated from the working examples. Prophetic Examples The above-mentioned examples with asterisks (*) are prophetic examples. Furthermore, all the samples that are bound with HPA can be blended with commercial 3M perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) ionomers. This experiment will be conducted to optimize the peroxide decomposing function of HPA and proton conductivity of the HPA itself.5-50 wt% of HPA bound ionomer can be blended with different equivalent weight 3M PFSAs, such as 800EW or 725EW. After the blending, membrane thermal annealing conditions can be varied, too. Example 6: Composite Membrane An example composite membrane was prepared as follows. A suspension of 20 wt-% 3M Ionomer 800EW in 70:30 ethanol to water solvent and a suspension of 8.37 wt-% of PFSA- VDF-HPA in DMAc were prepared at RT and stirred overnight. A mixture of two polymer suspensions in a ratio of 9:1 was made to obtain a 10 wt-% blended polymer suspension. Approximately 10 mL of the blended suspension was cast on a KAPTON liner using a doctor blade with a knife gap of 0.762 mm to fabricate a 100 cm 2 membrane. The cast suspension was first dried at 100˚C for 15 min followed by thermal annealing at 165˚C for 10 min. The membrane was peeled off the KAPTON liner and then acid-exchanged with 4M sulfuric acid overnight. The membrane was then rinsed with D.I water three times and dried in air overnight. Comparative Example 1 (CEX-1) A 32-μm membrane of 3M Ionomer 800EW was prepared as described in WO 2011/149732 (Yandrasits et al.) CE – (Electrolyte membrane with no nanofiber mat) without the addition of manganese cations and in a solvent system of 70/30 EtOH/H2O (w/w). The solution of ionomer was coated onto a polyimide liner with a target dry thickness of 32 μm. The film was further brought to 200^C to thermally anneal and cooled rapidly to room temperature. Test Methods and Material Verification For material verification, representative results for intermediate material PE:X-1 are shown graphically as FTIR (Figure 4A) and NMR (Figure 4B) spectra of materials before (Figure, 4, solid line) and after (Figure 4, dashed line) heteropolyacid attachment. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) The equipment used for FT-IR was a Nicolet Nexus 470 FTIR E.S.P equipped with Specac Golden Gate attenuated total reflection (ATR) stage under room temperature conditions. 512 scans with a resolution of 1 cm -1 was used on membrane or powder forms of the polymer. The IR spectra on 1130 (asymmetric) and 1200 (symmetric) cm -1 was the result of -CF2- stretching of the starting material (Howard W. Starkweather et al., Infrared Spectra of Amorphous and Crystalline Poly(tetrafluoroethylene, Macromolecules, 1985, 18, 1684-1686). Due to the domination of -CF2- stretching bands, aromatic group band was not able to be observed. However, with the covalent attachment of HPA the strong W-O bands between 700 and 1000 cm -1 appeared, which supports the successful attachment of HPA to the starting polymer (Claude Rocchiccioli-Deltcheff et al., Vibrational Investigations of Polyoxometalates. 2. Evidence for Anion-Anion Interactions in Molybdenum(VI) and Tungsten(VI) Compounds Related to the Keggin Structure. Inorg. Chem., 1983, 22, 207-216). Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Joel ECA 500 MHz spectrometer and DMSO-d6 solvent were used to obtain liquid NMR spectra. The chemical shifts for 1 H, 19 F, and 31 P were based on tetramethylsilane, trichlorofluoromethane, and phosphoric acid standards. NMR measurement was conducted to validate the covalent attachment of HPA to the starting polymer. 1 H NMR was first used to verify the existence of desired functional groups. For DHPP attached polymer, aromatic protons were observed from 7.0 to 7.2 ppm (Figure 5A, solid line). 31 P NMR shows more significant evidence of attachment of HPA to the polymer. When DHPP was attached, a sharp peak at 10.8 ppm was observed. When HPA was attached, chemical shift at 53.8 ppm and 8.6 ppm was observed (Figure 5B, dashed line).8.6 ppm shifts were more likely chemical shift of phosphorous anhydride and 13.8 ppm shift of two phosphorous attachment to the HPA (A.R. Motz et al., Heteropoly acid functionalized fluoroelastomer with outstanding chemical durability and performance for vehicular fuel cells. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11 (6), 1499-1509). Elemental Analysis Elemental analyses of (EX-6), (PE:XY-1), and (EX-1) were conducted using a flame Atomic Absorption (AA) Spectroscopy to provide a quantitative breakdown of individual elements within a sample (Hoffman Lab, U.S.A). The samples for the analysis were prepared in membrane form and ground prior to the analysis. For PFSA-VDF-HPPA (PE:XY-1), because there was no HPA but only phenol phosphonic acid group bound to the terpolymer, 1.37 % w/w (P) was obtained. When HPA was tethered to the terpolymer (PFSA-VDF-HPA (EX-1)), silicon (Si) and tungsten (W) was detected, 0.273 and 2.15 % w/w, respectively, due to the covalent binding of the silicotungstic heteropoly acid ( ^^-K 8 SiW 11 O 40 ▪13H 2 O). Also, when blended with 3M IONOMER 800EW (EX-6) as a 10 wt-% composite membrane, Si, W, and P were detected 0.035, 0.151, 0.0160, respectively. Thermal Properties Thermal Characterization. — Thermogravimetric analysis of membrane samples that had been pre-dried at room temperature under full vacuum for 24 hours was conducted in nitrogen or air from 0 to 800^C. The results for the PFSA-VDF-HPPA (PE:XY-1), PFSA-VDF-HPA (EX-1), and 10 wt-% composite membrane (EX 6) are described in the table below. Under N2 environment, in all cases, additional water molecules were lost up to 100˚C (< 2%). Up to 200˚C additional mass loss was observed likely due to loss of sulfonic acid groups. When the temperature was ramped up higher than 310˚C a rapid decrease in mass started likely due to the loss of sulfonate sites. Another rapid decrease occurred at 410˚C, is consistent with the primary degradation of PVDF (see, S.L.-M.G. Botelho et al., Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 354, 72 (2008)). Lastly, starting at 480˚C, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) backbone decomposition consistent with previous reports was observed (see, A. Kusoglu et al., Chem Rev, 117, 987 (2017); Y.K.S.H. de Almeida, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 58, 569 (1999); J.R.T. Chalres A. Wilkie et al., Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol.42, 901-909 (1991), 42, 901 (1991)). When the temperature was ramped up to 800˚C under air envionment, the elements in the membrane should exist in their most oxidized state. For HPA, the most oxidized form would be 11 WO 3 and 1 SiO 2 .11േ2 % was the final residue amount after 800˚C oxidization for EX-1. * Measured up to 780˚C Values inside the parenthesis are under air measurements. Proton Conductivity The proton conductivity of the membrane was measured using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The sample was loaded on a four-electrode setup and placed on the TestEquity environmental chamber to control the temperature and relative humidity. The proton conductivity at 80˚C and 80% RH was used as a value to compare different blending ratios, 5, 10, and 20 wt-% (w/w) of PFSA-VDF-HPA (EX-1) to 3M Ionomer 800EW.5, 10, and 20 wt-% blending ratio composite polymer were tested to get the proton conductivity, 0.029 േ 0.002 S/cm / 0.089 േ 0.02 S/cm / 0.045 േ 0.02 S/cm, respectively. The conductivity of the 10 wt-% blended polymer was the highest among the samples but still lower than a CEX-1 (0.130 േ 0.03 S/cm). The complete disclosures of the patents, patent documents, and publications cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety as if each were individually incorporated. To the extent that there is any conflict or discrepancy between this specification as written and the disclosure in any document that is incorporated by reference herein, this specification as written will control. Various modifications and alterations to this disclosure will become apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of this disclosure. It should be understood that this disclosure is not intended to be unduly limited by the illustrative embodiments and examples set forth herein and that such examples and embodiments are presented by way of example only with the scope of the disclosure intended to be limited only by the claims set forth herein as follows.
Next Patent: SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MEDIA FOR PRESENTING BIOPHYSICAL SIMULATIONS IN AN INTERACTIVE MIXED REALITY E...