NAJAFIAN NADER (US)
GASTEYGER CHRISTOPH (US)
SHEN TONG (US)
WO2018140956A1 | 2018-08-02 | |||
WO2014055835A1 | 2014-04-10 | |||
WO2019014360A1 | 2019-01-17 | |||
WO2023023227A1 | 2023-02-23 | |||
WO2023023220A1 | 2023-02-23 | |||
WO1997049805A2 | 1997-12-31 | |||
WO1994004678A1 | 1994-03-03 | |||
WO2007106120A2 | 2007-09-20 | |||
WO2007048037A2 | 2007-04-26 | |||
WO2007059782A1 | 2007-05-31 | |||
WO1997034103A1 | 1997-09-18 |
US5759808A | 1998-06-02 | |||
US5800988A | 1998-09-01 | |||
US5840526A | 1998-11-24 | |||
US5874541A | 1999-02-23 | |||
US6005079A | 1999-12-21 | |||
US6015695A | 2000-01-18 | |||
US6765087B1 | 2004-07-20 | |||
EP1589107A1 | 2005-10-26 |
TAMPAKI ATHINA ET AL: "Complement in sickle cell disease and targeted therapy: I know one thing, that I know nothing", BLOOD REVIEWS, vol. 48, 1 July 2021 (2021-07-01), AMSTERDAM, NL, pages 100805, XP093006805, ISSN: 0268-960X, Retrieved from the Internet
MERLE N.S. ET AL: "Complement activation during intravascular hemolysis: Implication for sickle cell disease and hemolytic transfusion reactions", TRANSFUSION CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE., vol. 26, no. 2, 1 May 2019 (2019-05-01), FR, pages 116 - 124, XP093006806, ISSN: 1246-7820, Retrieved from the Internet
DAI YANG ET AL: "A Phase 2a, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Multiple Dosing Regimens of Subcutaneous ALXN1820 in Adult Patients with Sickle Cell Disease", BLOOD, vol. 140, no. Supplement 1, 15 November 2022 (2022-11-15), US, pages 8298 - 8299, XP093109047, ISSN: 0006-4971, Retrieved from the Internet
Y. D. LIU ET AL: "N-terminal Glutamate to Pyroglutamate Conversion in Vivo for Human IgG2 Antibodies", JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, vol. 286, no. 13, 1 April 2011 (2011-04-01), pages 11211 - 11217, XP055086501, ISSN: 0021-9258, DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.185041
WARD, E. ET AL., NATURE, vol. 341, 1989, pages 544 - 546
EWERT, S. ET AL., BIOCHEMISTRY, vol. 41, 2002, pages 3628 - 36
TRANSUE, T. ET AL., PROTEINS, vol. 32, 1998, pages 515 - 22
LAUWEREYS, M. ET AL., EMBO J., vol. 17, 1998, pages 3512 - 20
BIRD ET AL., SCIENCE, vol. 242, 1988, pages 423 - 426
HUSTON ET AL., PROC. NATL. ACAD. SCI. USA, vol. 85, 1988, pages 5879 - 5883
"Epitope Mapping Protocols in Methods in Molecular Biology", vol. 66, 1996
DENNIS, M. ET AL., J. BIOL. CHEM., vol. 277, 2002, pages 35035 - 43
ZOLA: "Monoclonal Antibodies: A manual of techniques", 1988, CRC PRESS
HURRELL: "Monoclonal Hybridoma Antibodies: Techniques and Applications", 1982, CRC PRESS
SAERENS, D. ET AL., CURR. OPIN. PHARMACOL., vol. 8, 2008, pages 600 - 8
LIU ET AL., THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, vol. 286, no. 13, 2011, pages 11211 - 11217
MANNING ET AL., PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, vol. 27, no. 4, 2010, pages 544 - 575
PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO CLAIMS 1. A method for treating a human patient with sickle cell disease, the method comprising administering a properdin binding antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof to the patient, wherein the properdin binding antibody or an antigen binding fragment thereof comprises CDR1, CDR2, and CDR3 sequences as set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 2, 3, and 4, respectively. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof further comprises a human serum albumin binding sequence. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the human serum albumin binding sequence is fused to the C- terminus of the properdin binding antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof. 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the human serum albumin binding sequence is fused to the C- terminus of the properdin binding antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof by linker. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the linker comprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 10. 6. The method of any one of claims 2-5, wherein the human serum albumin binding sequence comprises CDR1, CDR2, and CDR3 sequences as set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 5, 6, and 7. 7. The method of any one of claims 1-6, wherein the antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof comprises the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, or a modification thereof. 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the modification comprises conversion of the N-terminal glutamine of the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 to pyro-glutamate. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 9. The method of any one of claims 1-8, wherein the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof is administered to the patient at a dose of 300 mg. 10. The method claim 9, wherein the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof administered to the patient weekly. 11. The method of claim 9 or 10, where the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof is administered to the patient for up to 12 weeks. 12. The method of claim 9, wherein the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof once is administered to the patient every 2 weeks. 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof is administered up to 4 times. 14. The method of any one of claims 1-8, wherein the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof is administered to the patient at a dose of 600 mg. 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof is administered to the patient every 4 weeks. 16. The method of claim 14 or 15, wherein the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof is administered the patient up to 4 times. 17. A method for treating a human patient with sickle cell disease, the method comprising administering a properdin binding antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof to the patient, wherein the properdin binding antibody or an antigen binding fragment thereof comprises the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, or a modification thereof, and wherein the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof is administered to the patient at a dose of 300 mg weekly for up to 12 weeks. 18. A method for treating a human patient with sickle cell disease, the method comprising administering a properdin binding antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof to the patient, wherein the properdin binding antibody or an antigen binding fragment thereof comprises the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, or a modification thereof, and wherein the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof is administered to the patient at a dose of 300 mg every 2 weeks up to 4 times. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 19. A method for treating a human patient with sickle cell disease, the method comprising administering a properdin binding antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof to the patient, wherein the properdin binding antibody or an antigen binding fragment thereof comprises the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, or a modification thereof, and wherein the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof is administered to the patient at a dose of 600 mg every 4 weeks up to 4 times. 20. The method of any one of claims 17-19, wherein the modification comprises conversion of the N- terminal glutamine of the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 to pyro-glutamate. 21. The method of any one of claims 1-20, wherein the patient has been clinically diagnosed with sickle cell disease. 22. The method of claim 21, wherein the sickle cell disease is HbSS or HbSβ0-thalassemia. 23. The method of any one of claims 1-22, wherein the patient is further administered hydroxyurea. 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the patient has been receiving a stable dose of hydroxyurea for at least 3 months prior to administration the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof. 25. The method of any one of claims 1-22, wherein the patient has not been administered hydroxyurea for at least 30 days prior to administration the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof. 26. The method of any one of claims 1-25, wherein the patient experiences no treatment emergent adverse events after 12 weeks of treatment. 27. The method of any one of claims 1-26, wherein the patient experiences no serious adverse events after 12 weeks of treatment. 28. The method of any one of claims 1-26, wherein the patient experiences no adverse events after 12 weeks of treatment. 29. The method of any one of claims 1-28, further comprising measuring a change in serum concentration of the antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof for up to 30 weeks after starting treatment. 30. The method of any one of claims 1-29, further comprising measuring a change in blood concentration of an anti-drug antibody for up to 30 weeks after starting treatment. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 31. The method of any one of claims 1-30, wherein the patient experiences a change in serum concentration from baseline of total and free properdin after up to 30 weeks of treatment. 32. The method of any one of claims 1-31, wherein the patient experiences a change in serum concentration from baseline of complement component Ba (Ba), complement component C3a (C3a), or soluble complement component C5B-9 (sC5B9) after 12 weeks of treatment. 33. The method of any one of claims 1-32, wherein the patient experiences a change from baseline in blood or serum concentration of hemopexin, nitric oxide, an inflammatory marker, or a cell adhesion marker after 12 weeks of treatment. 34. The method of claim 33, wherein the inflammatory marker comprises interleukin-1. 35. The method of claim 33 or 34, wherein the cell adhesion marker comprises soluble P-selectin. 36. The method of any one of claims 1-30, wherein the patient experiences a change from baseline in hemoglobin levels after 12 weeks of treatment. 37. The method of any one of claims 1-36, wherein the patient experiences a change in serum LDH levels, indirect bilirubin, haptoglobin, or hemopexin after 12 weeks from baseline. 38. The method of any one of claims 1-37, wherein the patient experiences a change in reticulocyte levels after 12 weeks from baseline. 39. The method of any one of claims 1-38, wherein the patient experiences a reduced rate of vaso occlusive crisis after 12 weeks of treatment in comparison to baseline. 40. The method of any one of claims 1-39, wherein the patient experiences an increased time to first vaso-occlusive crisis after 12 weeks of treatment in comparison to baseline. 41. The method of any one of claims 1-40, wherein the antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof is formulated for subcutaneous administration. 42. The method of any one of claims 1-41, wherein the antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof is formulated at a pH of 5.4 at a concentration of 150 mg/mL in an aqueous solution comprising 20 nM sodium acetate, 250 mM sucrose, and 0.05% polysorbate-80. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 43. The method of any one of claims 1-42, wherein the human patient is between 18 and 65 years of age. 44. The method of any one of claims 1-43, wherein the human patient has a body weight of ≥ 40 kg. |
PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO Population Description Safety All participants who receive at least 1 dose of study drug t e ment Safety Analysis All safety analyses are performed on the Safety Population and is reported by each cohort and treatment arm. Safety analyses includes an analysis of all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), electrocardiograms (ECG’s), clinical laboratory data, physical examinations, and vital sign measurements using descriptive statistics. No inferential statistical analyses are planned on the safety parameters of this study. The prevalence of AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) is summarized, by System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term for each cohort and treatment arm and overall, within each treatment arm, by relationship to study drug. AEs are summarized by cohort and overall by severity. SAEs and AEs resulting in withdrawal from the study are listed. Participants having multiple AEs within a category (e.g., overall, SOC, Preferred Term) are counted once in that category. For severity tables, a participant’s most severe event within a category is counted. All concomitant medications are coded using the World Health Organization Drug Dictionary, and the frequency and percentage of concomitant medications are summarized. Efficacy Analysis Absolute and percentage change from baseline in complement biomarkers, hemoglobin and hemolysis markers are evaluated at the end of the Treatment Period (12 weeks) for Cohort 1 and Cohort 2. Time to hemoglobin response (defined as an increase in hemoglobin levels of > 1g/dL from baseline) is evaluated at the end of the Treatment Period (12 weeks) for Cohort 1 and Cohort 2. Pharmacokinetic Analysis The individual serum concentration data from participants who receive the SC dose of the fusion polypeptide described herein with actual sampling dates and times, is used to characterize the PK by population PK analysis approach. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO Pharmacodynamic Analysis The PD effects of all the SC doses of the fusion polypeptide described herein administered is evaluated by assessing changes in serum total and free properdin concentrations and complement alternative pathway (CAP) activity using the Wieslab alternative pathway (AP) assay. In addition, complement classical pathway activity and other measures of properdin activity over time may be considered as deemed appropriate (Section 8.6). Immunogenicity Analysis Immunogenicity, as measured by incidence of antidrug antibody (ADA) to the fusion polypeptide described herein are summarized. Exploratory Analysis Additional exploratory analyses on biomarker assays and clinical efficacy endpoints may be conducted. Details of these analyses are presented in the statistical analysis plan (SAP). Interim Analysis An interim analysis may be performed after at least 12 patients from Cohorts 1 and 2 (6 from each cohort) have enrolled and completed the Treatment Period (12 weeks). Details of this analysis are presented in the SAP. 1.3 Schedule of Activities (SoA) The SoA for once weekly (QW) dosing for multiple-dose Cohort 1 for Screening through Day 85 is presented in Table 3. The SoA for once every 4 weeks (Q4W) dosing for multiple-dose Cohort 2 for Screening through Day 85 is presented in Table 4. Table 5 presents the SoA for intensive PK/PD sampling for a subset of participants in Cohorts 1 and 2. Table 6 presents the SoA for Cohorts 1 and 2 for Day 99 through the end of the Follow-up Period. The SoA for once every 2 weeks (Q2W) dosing for optional multiple-dose Cohort 3 for Screening through Day 43 is presented in Table 7. Table 8 presents the SoA for Cohort 3 for Day 57 through the end of the Follow-up Period.
PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO y a 5 1 D 8 ± X X X X – s e i t y i a 1 A X X X v D N X X X i t c A i f n 6 o e 5 – e g –y a A e l r n y 1 X X X X X X X X X u c a D N d S D o t e h c S a t ) n b r r d a c o n d n f y y e a s i n r f f o o f o a a r t o e n t i o i t o n n l o a f i c o n e y r s ,t c d n oi a i o t c i n d n h s i g f y m y D ( c r c a o i t o n o i t n n s i h o e o i e g e : a z 3 D w d e y t i t m a a rt c o o i t t a a rt o o e l y o i li o m r i s i d m i t hl p a i n g n a n r l t a t a i i l t a w o l h c i m r i s i l n n u b d d m e a n i a c g a c i n i v e a c i n i , t h o t a a a u n i r o b i g d n f n i i m n c f i c n m a T t f i S B n c i o c d m s y m a r b s y m a g i e I m c i n W n I l E a R o C d e a m a v o C d a i p H S a e v M e d h P x e b A h p x e e H M B e i H l C PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO y a 5 8 1 ± X X X X X X X X X X g n i s o D W Q – ) 1 t r o h o C ( 5 8 y a D h g u o r h T g n i n D e e r c y S a 8 1 ± X X X – D s e i t y i a 1 A v D N X X X X X X X X X X i t c A i f n 6 – o e 5 –y e e r g n y a D 1 A N X X X X X X X X l u c d S a D o t e h c ) S C 2 d y h W r ) d n y a f n a g t s t s t i Q o f D n a 1 e e t o p n G n e C oi j s e l p e t m : a ( oi t B 3 D w a l s s i t e n i r y s u c s i g n m E g t e e a e l t u r rt p m k , a j l i e s s r n l e k e l y o d d u i g t a n p e y t ( n / n s e m a y n l i d u n g a u l ) g i e s r l u s a ci d l y s i d n i m a s n n s d a o p i t c o it r a b u n i a p e r Ve r r e ni c n a a p i u m o e c m a T t S W o C e H c s I H c s e S r p r U n i i ( r t u i e V m r T t S d a K o P l B D j a o P n I e r i B PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO y a 5 8 1 ± X X X l o f a n i A.t o t e o ti ( ( n y y d u r a b g s n i o f f ( l a m r a t m i s i y a 6 1 o l M s l u s t u s s r v i e i t o f y t n a e e y r n r a t t d . 3 r a D 3 ± ← X X o u o n e y c n u it n i a i t e e e t e p e d d p n t n e r a 3 r r v o p e m e e a y o o . s p l n l i h et E f . n g b r n n o f r m r m o r o n i f m a 9 1 D 2 ± X X X c o r c f t o r e n a ti a t e , ws o it i r a a c e f p r e r e 0 2 i o n ti b d ) o n o e m s d y a n e i ri di t e i t a a d n i e t c b s c d l i e e t b p p e s o r i t s a d a y a 2 M M i a u g n i 4 1 a h y c t s n e a l t 2 1 t ± X X ← ← b q o e r n i n c c n v a r c e f o n s a it e s r u y l a D e b y t e a v h t t f s n g e t s n ht i t i li m y s a t s n e r y s e o r 1 w y s b i a a 5 1 u g i i l r d e a s e r e l k a p p c t e e i c n p y d i e a d a e D 1 ± X X X mt e s s l n l e l i a e at n o e w t m 2 r ni n a r t p u g o D m r e r o l b n o o f r s f N ( n t A p ) e y 1 n . 1 o f i a s a . e l . ) ci d e p a 8 X X o n n o , e rt e l n a g n y t s D ± c y o d a i i t g o i m i c i l a t m r G y e D t a c e n f i s n o t it a t l i a z i . d e f s l o s o l o d p o f r C E a D 1 A N X X X m r d o f n m ri f n i o d n t e n m e n a r t s e t h t i r e o p , e l n a n l i g o a c e r v r u s o d i n . a t o f ri f s l ( g e r a b i s 6 5 – d n i c c o e v n e g n o f e e t i c b n i c it y o i a r g n o i b n o d e e o r t i r a c o o n i l d s a n G e f – y o e o g s d b i t e r a u i r y a C t y a a D 1 A N X X X r p r c w o l n i y a u t t n r oi e r q c s e r p t b t s E o n D o t p a S - t l o f n e d s a r C a 4 e ci p S e t l p s i n d a e r d i n d a s i d s r m u f 1 t t a i t ti c a s y a y m t n a s u a el e g e q e - e 2 l u e q d d r E I e d s s c c o k s a n i l y a h d l n s t r d e y p r n f i p 1 d e e h ) y y t i i t f a c r s e t e s o s i r e l t o h p o 4 1 o I o o c n t o i u s t a c s a c D i p e o t n y ( n e p y l t t n e i t e f t t n s n a e d s n o d a i e a w r p t s M l b a n n m u , c i l s i s t a h t s n s t e a B g g s i r e g n i p i h t w g o o p e a a a m p s t i n o v e n i z i e o i n t a e l d n n i t e r t n s n rt f I s m i t a e a y ti l m c u t a a p i r t a a t s p a p r o e e e s ( o d n n u n o i m i n s ) so w A e C e i p w v y r e i o c s r d v c i d e e i n b i o d d n n e r i i c c i p t r o r s e i h g a f m i i - n u r c i ( r t e c S o g d n i W m I u f ( D s A s A O V e a R i d e n R o e v C m d g A i g i l a o c a a p p r e o e r a n i r t e r s o a S bE c R d T v P a e s e H fN g S p u hA iP d PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO f - e o e h t a l l s r p . t r y a r t a n r e e l p y l 1 e n a i e a i d y r u n r c n r dt a o t m l a u f a D d s s i t n o n a t e a i c c t y a t y e t e ; s c m i o h n = D n a ) d p f a f a a r t E P A / o i K t n c i a a e g m t c e h s s t t y g o t n N ; P a s e l n e a a l l o s a p n a i d r e d e n e r r o f e n e p 0 c w i e e i c it s s a c n e i p c c e h t h l t 0 v 1 b e r e r a r o d r t c e a d v b i n t i n d u n a P r y a e p d e y a e l n e e I t a . s m s g o , m 0 e n A n d g i u t o t = = C g i u s i r 3 u i n A T D n i n i t e A s s e l a d n G j C E I n o c e h t n e r D E f i o c o d d c i a, E ; m cl v i s S- 2 t e i n i l n c i e ; y r o a f c u l w c d n g Kn e o i t ni m r d e f il r n m a e a t c c h e h w n o c c o r a a s s u q t h y d t a e s o g - o f u u e r r e p n n s o l d d s o r r e a v e c e t a b i e o i a p e a s a r o t c r c s v i c n v t d e = s i e n h o r ti t t c e , h t a y g i t e h e t d a n e r m m r t n C O s , c r s e e et l o e l V G . C e . s E s y o t r e l l m u o f e v r d i u o c ( r e s e n I u i s t p a f n i a v ; y e . t n = a r l k e d v i t c c s o t d s c a o e sr l p e n e p y g e F t e t e e n s o o f m h T o t l o n i n m e C I = w t o s p P oi t d ( o s A c t s d a s . y t i p g i l p ; s 4 e c r o l a d s P r u i v n o i s m o u r i Vn . u C a o d e r i f o l e b n f o t i t s h c s u F C f C I c = v o y M = d e h n a h t 4 a fi t o i e a g n d d h t e t e r h c ; t et f P A n e d i c W a n i d n o a t a a i a Q e d p n d i i t u t f Cc i ; ) e r a r e 2 e n p a v i c s i s e . c e l l x a l ti o s h g n o s a s k n i ; g x f e e c d i t e s ( c i b n o o e r y a e r o y i v u o p i c si e d o n c a t e t e p d o C . h p d r h i t r r n b n i s u a r n i d w e t e e e e r g t b f n i r ) t r a e l t a o i t s n s m t e k o d s o o i r a n a u d y r p t c e a m i t p p a r e a e c h i d e h t e f v e m n n i a nt d o n n a d o n s s y c r h n il e y d a mm m r a n a l e a t o e k e t i o m v s n e p t i a s r o b u a i t d i t e i ti u r a d h p wc s c e v = h e p o d s o e t g d n i - m u c 2 w 2 s n e p a t e o c d a I = n e = l s e r r u d e t s e s s n i e o g s M V B I y K P o p d t e d s n t o c a r e a mn i u o ; H ; h t e ; ) f a s c e l l e l p d C eO e e n e ir y d B s ( o d s s r e t e s s i o n c t a y h t c V n m e s o b e m u c i s e f o e l f o g i s l d it p y t i s m u c s o o e h l i i l a s b e l o s e a i t n a n a e s a a n o t a r e d l s a c m d n e s g a t o y d 4 o c t d u l k u o c s i o t d e i t n i e e a o t n u r z n p i o v r a h s d s e p fi l p e v d it e d c a h r ti a t c e m s e t s e l l n o o i b n c l e p m m y s a u e e n ul f = m q h t e a n i A r T a w e d l e p o c i t c r o i t p a o f c s a s s d r e u .t , r o o w s r = s r e i v e v A u l i D h E p - = m me r r a e o s a r s l l s n e s r c o t e . t d D f r e e l o c y n v e u c e r a r n af A h : p o 2 KD P e . p n D s o P e l t p i s p n . d m 2 a c t . g i t o t a a e f e o n h o h t C ei t t i s i s e d p n i o s c it n n m ; o i oi t e a e e ; t t e l b s i t d mo i e s t e f Oa v v n a r a t c a i H i a G c e n C ll a a s t c v e l d , s a o Vp y I s p j o s o e v = m c i E o c KD n e o l e s o c e n m i a e r e e e l l e f h v r e h m i e h o b B i m o l p p j P kP I r B d I t I T T t t C H C l m n o p q r b A a PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 5 g n i s o D W 4 Q – ) 2 t r o h o C ( 5 8 y a D h g u o r h T g n i n e e r c S – s g o e i n t i t 1 i n v i e 6 5 – –y A X X X X X X X X X X t c e X X X r y a N D A c f Sa D o e l u d n o e n n e d n e a i t a I M e e e r c y h c B i n i c n o l a B r c s ) n c S a t n b r o f r o Hf c d a n i t a c i s d n f y s r C 2 a n g ) e ai r c n f o o l f o o v a y n i y h a,t t s i d d n e r y s n e t o i t n n o a c n n o e a i r o s c i m p h f m f n a a p y a o i r a o : i i t c od n o i i t n t s h a x d n g i y e n 1 e a D ( c c z i t a r c o t a o i p e e t o i 4 D t e g h oi B s n i r w d e y ti a l t i m m s i o i g t a a r m t s i m h u l a a r l a g a i v a w o l c t n i , t o t l a a l s i t e i p y u / e l y o b d d m r b i o d r a u n if n n i n i n n i r c if n n i e n c i d o c i s e y r b m h g i a m c i u g t t a a p ( m u r g t T t n i o f g i S W n I l E a R o m e c C d a m a v o m p e m C d a S M e d h P b a A x e e H e ni H l C o C e V H I H e s S e t PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 5 l a M M o y e a a ← ← e b t t i l s i m v h t b y i a i d s s 1 u g y m i l r e e a s e e l sr l a A X X X X X X X X X X X t n l l i e a t t n e D N e s af N o m t n . 1 o ( n n f i a o c y n o i , e rt o d a o i t t c g n t e D a e f i s n o i 61 5 – m r d m ri n i o t n –y A X X X X o f n a f n l d a e e v y a N X X X n i g a D n o c c c r o f r e t D d i e v n e g o e n i e n i c o b y t o h l o r r w g e p c o l l n i s y d a u t s p s t n oi n s n t a a s p l n n p a St o f n e d e o o i - C a s g e r m 4 1 t a n i m r t s i D n oi i t s o p un C y r q t d e r d a c i E I d e s u c f o t s i t a i n u n i P r o c a f ( ) A O a V i d r a d e r d e s c k t e o s i r e l i o ) u y l a c s n a i G m d f e e r y ti c D f o t c n y s t m t n a s d s n o t h i e a w D i ( e ( s w i m C E a j s l p e t i m i n A e t n e i t e f t n e a v d s t a h t s n s t s n e g u e l p m s r e e g d i t e a p a s at i e n a i y z i e c o i t n a o y d l g i t a r d n a ) m a s n i ni e s l ci l y o k r n i a t d a s d i r o n p m e s w w m e s d ti li m o u d a n p i o t c a u p s e e i e i o c r e e n b i d e r i c c i t i p i u W 4 o e j m o m y l s v e v e n o v g i g i l n a o c r a W U r u V r T t S Q K P l B k, j n I i B m I o p s A R R C d A aS bE c R d T a v P PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO - n o f e f r e t l l o i A t . a e n l t i o t e p 1 h t a y a t s n r i a s i r a s o y . e r a r a a e c t c m v a e 1 s d e e e r l p y a n l l D t i r e i d d u n r c n r t a o v f y h c t l at a t p , m e d a s u f a n i d n o n t ei c t y t y t ; s c i o n a c a D r c h e o t f o o f y a D s i P n a g a a ) d a p e f e a f a m a h r t E = A c o m g r s e l i k b e / o d K it a a e t e s c n m c e h t t s n y g o t i n N ; n f i n e e s r P u s i e a e e s h t a l l l o s a p n i a d r e d e n i . s i n o e c w o o 3 h g r n r p c w 5 i o s f e e h d 0 t n 0 e e i b v c it s r s a c n a e r o r e t p c e c s i a r c m t ) n i . o b li a 1 y e r p d c d v e e h h e t h ti 0 d d d n i t n g P a t u n i r e d e l n I e t v i m e y d a e = a s r c r w a t a s . n i s t a e l m u 0 s n e o , A n g i u t o s t = C g u u j l c s n e t i n i , o 1 d e 3 e e n u r A c T D A s e l a d n G a C E I n o c o - o s t m i v p , e 2 h i c h n t i i t n S D g E f o d d c i n , ; n E ; m cl o s e d d a e g v n m y i l e s e w o c n i - r 2 t n e i f i l c i e r y r a a o f c a c v m e i i n t t h e e d e a h t r m i f d I e n m o i u K t d d e i l n m s a u e q h e w t o = t h d h t n e c s o C e b c a r c i u x o . ) r a e c a s r y r e a n g O d l e S q u v o a e h e r r p e l o f r u l a n o d e e s o r r a b i p r e o n c i n V ; t r p b e a a t p v e t c t a r s h h t a o t c y c s v i t d e s m k s , t . f i e h t a p e e r e h e l l i c e h t a g i e h e d a n e r mt e n e r e o .i d t e o f l s c c a s t , o c , ( m r t o s t e e d et l r o f e l w 4 f ( e l a y i m l e r t r a m a o i s G . e . y s r e u r f e s v r u i t p a t n i a v y r f t a t i t r C E s o ti v u c s o e s e l n I s n e p . n e = a rt e e n v e r 3 t e d E o p e d a p e dt i t c c o dt r o p e h e o y l g n i m F C e t v e m . d e a s o s o a n o s r i f ( m a T. t t i o p n g e l I . p e p ; = e c n g b r o e m r n i d t p P A i t c f e d o sl y d s i n i s m s u 4 V n o o it n i r n f a r e m r o f r m s o s r C a h t o l a n u t v o i s F o c r i v C = a a c p o f n r e p 0 2 P . u o d i e n e r g bf o i t s h i . ti c u f C I = y M c b t s e e s c d l i e t b p o s i t s d e h a af n i d a t a 4 n i i v o d s i e h t a e e r e P c n ; d i W 4 d i e n o d a v t t a h t t f a A e i c Q a v h y r c c t i s n e l d t e n d r n c e i t c s i d e u o t f o s C; c i f a c ; ) e f n s i t f o a n t e s r a u y l a p e a e p a r e l x l u h n h g n a s n i x e d i t t r e s ( e 2 o r s y o t l o a l y d e u p i k s c i g e e d o c i t a s t g s n e e t s s o i w b n e p a d r o k a r p y c e r 1 d o t e e e g i r C p . h ) h o r c i t r b n i n u a a e n t p a c s h t r a n o i i s t s s m r t k e p e i w c i t e n a p y a e d w t r ni r n d o D m r e e e r b f n i d s s r a n o e p a n u y r p t c n e a m i e t a r r e o c e a i d e h t e f v e m n n i a 2 a g t p u e o l s a e A r b n o o f r nt d n n a d mi t s o y p r h n il e y d a m m r a e . n l a . p ) g l d e a ci t e p o a l s n a n k t o e s t o o e i o v s t d w t e i a e p t i a s r o b m u a i d h w ti d a p wc s c e v = h e p l t o a i t m n i s c o a t s m r G d o e t c d 2 s n e t a t e o c d a I = n e = l i a e f l o C d m e t e c e o M V I y K l t z n i . l l o d ) o f u m d e a r t y s c i h l t r r e E g - o p , n e i e r u r u l s o p t e d s n c t o e s l s l o a e r e l l n i m g n l e p o c C e i s u B n o i r ; y H P d ; h t ; B e ) s ( s o c i d . n i o f ri f o p ( e r b i d f a s t n g a t s c c t a y h e O V e n e e o e mc i o d o i a r n i b t e g n a s o e r r ti i d s a e o d e s i e r f r a f g i m l s d b it p y u i s m f s r e t s s n a e b o s o s e a i n n t s a b i t o t n n r e i e u o i r s i q r s n G t u c p y b a t C e a oi t s E o o l l o t a r d u e l e u s e a l s p m d t n a a e a t n y o d e t s t g u a z o p d a oi r c s e e r t d s d n s h o c d l a k r o c mt p e i f o n r d n e i d o c ci t p Sl c p s i n a e r d i n a i 4 e e t v a h s d e a s m i l p e v it ul = a a s t l y y a a y m t l a s n u a el e g e q e - e 2 l n u i r d h ti a c e m s e l l n o o i s t b n o c , e s r y a u e h d n s t u s q h t e n e a f s = n i Am r T a p o 4 o r 1 I d o y r c p e r n t f i i p 1 e w e u e t h l o c d p c i t c r i t p a o f c s e u .t c s c d r o r o o w r e r i v e s v A u l i D h E p - = p t s M o l n e t a B b a o n n m s a s u c s e me r e r s l l s n e s c o t e . t d D A h p 2 r , g i l s i m r a s a e e l o c y n v i s e r a r n af : o K D P a e i r l d g g i t n n i e r t n e s n i p n i rt h t f of r . s n D e l t i s p . m 2 af e e i r c t n . g i t o t a e t i s d p i o s c n n m ; o e e e ; e l p a a t s p a r e e I ( e o r s t a p i o ( e r s g p o i P p t d m n o i d e a s e h t o e h t f C i O t a s i v e v n it o n a r a i t i t a t t c a i H i b a p e p i h f r g i - m n u r c i t r e n c o n i Sd e i s c n s G e ll a a s t c v e l o d , s s o e s a o c e Vp y I e r e e s e p e l l v e = m c r i a e s e o e a Bml p e H fN g S p r u t r o Co KD j n e o l o n m i af h v h A iP d E c jP kP l I r m B d nI t I T e h T m i e t h t o C b i o p o p q r b A H C a PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO t s o , 2 p e s ) s e b 9 s o r d u o t y r a u o 5 o 8 h X X e r D h y 4 a 8 2 6 a ± s t n o h c o y ) n i a C a s r d e m r n i Dt u o i f a h s t 6 s h i c e p n 8 o p 4 p = e i y t a s r ± ( X X s g . y t K P a D u e n i i ; P f o s l v i t ) s o h o 4 d p m c a ( c i t e 2 ( 5 8 a P s s A m a b D u P S y a / Cn d y d r K n a o c o Dt ) P e n a f s , s r v i m D 4 o e u i d r r a P / y p s o o s K a s r h X X n e e p h p P D u d t 1 4 n i o r p = e o 2 h ± e r e D v i s 2 o e r f P ; n 7 e ( m d y t a a n I o n a w l h r y o a ) f Ds g r r u e a t d . t a 6 o t p e g t n s o n i u m v i l 2 o p y p h 4 y e l a b u r t a n m a s a D r ± S u ( X X m a s T e s r e t d s tl o e s n n s e a t D h P / 4 o 2 d e i t a s ( 1 a , p 4 s n e e a m K P 2 l b o t e l l d a p a n T d e m n a , t 3 c o o i t 1 e e l l c p D t r l b o = c O P r o o f h a o Tr e P r A a C a y s e l C p f e o p s : s d e l n o : a e l 5 D p m t e m a e e p s s b m r m it a a i l y a d b l u of s v b d a u s o e n s r e D e r b T t S K o P l B a p aA p bP b A PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO t n e b p m y t i u - 4 2 d n a 1 s t r o h o C, d oi r e P p u -w o l l o Ff o d n E h g u o r h T 9 9 y a d i D v – e ) r o s A e e i t D n i o v i P A t e h c n A p C d i ( A o i ) , t p y l f t a e n i e e t o n e i ni r t l m s l e d r p y o l m u d a u x s t e t n e a p o p s e r e t n o p y p o r p n n o d e h n l e s c n D e o i f g i t e c o i a m S t a a c i m e c g n i a n P r e r s C y f u f r a h d ) n r c i r o i s y r u y y m h p s rt d a u g e o f d ( O y V i f d a c d e i f s r e e G s c i c l c r p s e l n a ti t c i o n y t mt t n p y a a x d m C E y m e n n i ( e s p l a d s n t n e i t e f n e v e b : a D ( e e t g o h oi t 6 D s i ni r e l m t o r e e w l a a i n g e i t l o cl a l s u / p a s t ) k g e a r o m p a s a ti e y m e a e l y b d o d c i v s e r s a l c i l t a a u y l m m a u m c i g a a n u a s d myt o u r i v a n s i m u s w w e e i v e i o s r m v c n e t i T t n i y S W h b P b a t A i p i V r T e n i H l C o i C r r U e o e t o m s S K P l B s ( c a i B m I s A e R e R o v s i C d A aV PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO l a n . e t a l l s ; o l h t i t e i v r y a r t a n r ) e s ( d e a a i d c c i d l e a e n d r n t e e n i l r t a o n v e ei c o c y y n i k a s t h a a t a t p e t f e f ; o n c a y b d a e e t a c e h s a t s o i t m r m h t s t f e l l t s n a y n a a a n i h p n o o c w e p i i c it s s m r e = e i t % a 0 e v r e p 8 b e r a r t d yl K P , r y d o a e p d r ; e y ) o d a a e s i e m n r g A g i u t o s t d = ( c i e n D s P a r A e p l d l a n T m a E ; a n u a f - o m r t d c i , y n e i n f i l n c i e m a r d o w o l l o n e i l m a e r h e h g c o i a o F a s u q t d d o s r m r e r y r e a a e t h s o r b i c h t p f d e s a r a o t c r y c o s r t c = o n r e a e e e l D d n u t h t g i h d e P e e r r t o s t e f e e r di = ; d i e h e t v a s v e n I u s t p G c e C a t . l a h e p e n l r n h e p y l g n E ; c i t e e i r m v h a T o t t o i p n y a e c e t l i u s . l y i s i n g i a s w a r e e d n i o t n a a d n u t v o i F h t a t e l d ) o i t s h c s u f C I p t e e s e a i e m d h t a e e r e e v i n i a b m ri s d a . t t a h t t f a t a m a i e f n a l p s i r e u o t f o s n r d h t o f c 0 x a d i h g n a s n i et l e n o n 0 e 1 l y v h o r u o p % r i k g c i si r e b a t e l y e P p p 0 b r h t o a r n n h t n e r t a s p o i t e n m e 8r s o a , A a a c y r t a e c e e v e l m e h T r o h t l i d h t f n g y t n i D v E y t a r e ht i e p u i l e s s m o s a a i r t l c - i v i e h p i w a c r e c t o a a 2 K ti s a a p s t c o v d = p i m P d r n n e y b a e c P d o A n e o a s A = C . a s r e d e i m g n i u C; A n l i . e d e d e p m C e n o i r y d T a t o n t u m n o i t a t a r y t h r o O V e n e e o D E d s i f f r f g i m l s b i - e k h t b c o e o s e a i d n t n 2 K n r e u e a o t w d s , i m e u s p a e s b m d t d n e t . t a a ; . n s t g u ms i e r 2 e t t 1 e s l e r c l e s d t s o t p e i fi l o p a p n r r i e d i o f s i r o y n r p p m r e o t u m a f c my e c v s u h t i t r e t n t a n c e e v s e m a v o a h e c s ( e s d d p s C . O s q d r a e o w s = s i e p r e A n o s u l y t t i i e b o o o l o l u t n V r o r i b s e f c o t v e v e h t d D c Ad c c v s i i t V y a b g f y o n v o e c a e t n r t a r g i o f a t o f o : s e o m- o a p m u t i n i t n f o e h e n . t t ei i s t s t e d r a n n oi r o f s a v P - A w s i v s o a i f t m t c e f i o s s a v v n n a p o i e t t c a i n i = C o ll s i - n e o l s l a o c e e p y s e r I e e s e h t e l l v o e r = F C fI o F h T N n m i s h v e h m i n b CO b c d C e I t fA gT hT t o i C b A I V PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO g n i s o D W 2 Q – ) 3 t r o h o C l a n o i t p O ( 3 4 y a D h g u o r h T g n i n e e r c S n i D A N X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X – n e o t s e e i r 6 c 5 t i v S i t c A f o d g t e l n u o i d n o n e s e t h d t e a n i n t e I n e e r h i a a n y s t c i n l M B e r c s c n n e S a c t n b r c B i o f a v r o H c f c d a n o i t a c a a i s d c n f a y s ) r C 2 a n m e r ) d g e ai c f o l f o v n i y y s , t n e u n r e n o i o n a c o n e y a r s m h p t h s f i f d n a r p s a y a D o t c i r c t a n z o i oi t t a c o n o i oi t t i o t c i a a n o s i h p x e d e n g t o i i e y m g e n a h o 1 i B s e n e i m : a ( 7 D w d e y t e i i a r l y l m m t s c i o a r g m t s i m h u l a a r l a a i t v a w o l c t n , o t l a l s i t e r i p u / s i s n g i b d o d m r i b i o d r a u n if n n i n i r n if n n i e n c i g c d o i s e r i t b m h g i a a u t y t m y l s m c i g a a p ( u a n l T t n i o f g i S W n I l E a R o m e C d a m o m p e m y a C d a S M e d h P b A x e e H e ni H l C o C e V H I r i H e S r a t U i V PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO l a n A o i . ti o u o n e i y e e e t p e . d n u a i n t a 3 r r v E o p e m r e t n it o n e r o f . s p n i e t l l h ti t f . n g b n i n o f r m r o f 1 c o r c r e b n a a e, o ) ws it r a c e s d y a a p r e n e t e p y a A N X X X X X X X X X o ti o ti d e m e i d e t a d i c b d s e t b e r D n o n M o n i r M a i i t t u i ga n i 4 c l i o 1 a v h c y c t a s s ← ← b q o e r n i c c n r f n e b y n ti e a l v a a it e r i m y h t e t f o a s t n s u n g e e t s s t s b i a i d s a s s k a r p y c e r u g 1 m i l r e e s e e l e p i – t s r l n l l i a t n e w c i t e n a p r ni a e t e 2 a r n d u g o e o l y a e s f N ( o n m t t p r s e A p b ) D A X X X X X n . o 1 o n n f o i a , e rt a e . n l a . g l a c c i t o N t c y o d a i t i a t c g n l i n t o a i t m n i a t a e f s o o l s 6 e D e f s o it l i z i d l r d ) o 5 md m o r n i o n t e l a t y c h t r f n n a i f n l d i g o a e r e n v r u m o n d i a t r o s f ri i f l o o ( d n i c c c o o f e e t s n c it n . a g n b o d o p t e t g n i W 2 e k v n e g n i c o b i y o i r i b i o t n e e e r ri r i u o i r s d n Q , jl o r e r c w o g n i s y d u t t n r o e r a s q y e p b a t s n o e p i t n s p a S l t l o f n a e d s a i c r p c S e l r t s i n d a e d a a rt p l n n o i - C a s s i D n o i s o p y q t a E d e r m 4 u f 1 e t a i t o t s i ti c a s t l y a a p y m t l a s n ri n e g u a t e q e n i P o r i t c u a f ( n C ) A O r a d V i d r c a i I d s c e r d e s e c o k s a n i y i e l o h d n s p 4 o I d o y r c p e r n t f i i p u ) i m o f e y ti D f t c m s t t a s n r t a h o r 1 t M o l n a o n m s y G d a C a j e l r c i A o t n e y t t n d s a o i t e h w p s B b n s u r , g D s p e t ( E g e l m i s m r n e e d i n i e t e a f a n a e t v e d n s i a z t s i e n o s i t n e t a e l d g g i n n i e r t n e s n i n w e t u o a r d p d ci m a s n e o k g i r o t n p m p s i e s w w m o e a y s d ti li m c t a ai o u d a n p i r t p a a t s p a r e s t a p i o ( e r n i l p y i d a s d o t c a m u r u t K o l e j m p y s e n o i l o s e i s v e i e v c r e n e e o v n b i d g i g d i l n e a r i c c o c i t a r o r a p e i h f p r g i - m n u e e o r c i t e r e a n c i r St W T S P B I B m I p A R R C A aS bE c R d T v P a s e H fN g S p u hA PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO f o f t - r a e e l o h t a l s t e s s r o p . t r y a r t n r e d e l 1 e a h t e e a i a r p d e c y y ni r n d r a n o e p r , m l a l u a f D u r t n c c t o t d o f d t ei y y s c o n e e s b y a D s i a n a t t l P n n i a) d a s e p e t f e a f ; a m i a h r t E = A r e / o it a g a t e s t s g t N u d K o s P c m c h a a s t h i a e l l s n a y n o a i n d e ; e 5 g e r e r n e l p o c w e p i r d . n c i s a c n e n i c 0 i o s f e e h h t 0 0 e i b v t r s e r o r t p e c a . d o n d b t n li d t n 1 e a P y r a p d d c e d v n e s i s a , d i 1 e l m n u g r a e o m e y a l I t i r , u 0 n d o e = a g c 2 d 3 s n e i n , A A g i u t t s s d = G Cu j n e v i y e n l h i u n e i e r T D D A e d l a c n a C E I ; o c s u e t c ht i t n c E - f o d i n i , n a s i E ; m r l a l c c e w o c S g 2 K t n e i l e y e f il c r a o f c c o -m i h x t f d e n o ni r d m a u e h e w t t h h t n o c o s o I m i t u n s q d a e s o a r . ) r a d a s r y r e n g v p p e l o f r u l a e c d e e s o r r a b i p r e o n c i n = a t b a a t e p v e n t o a r s t a o t c y c s v i t d e C mO s p e e e c r e h t c i c e h t a g i e h e d a n e r mt n V ; m i c a s t , e l l , t a G . 3 s i e . y s r o c m r t t ( u o s e e d et l r o f e l s k r f e v r u i t p a t n i a v e e d t r C E s o ti v u c e e s s e l n I s n e . n = a rt w e a e d i t c c o s o r o p e h e p y l g n e i m F e t 2 m p r a s o o t s a n dt f ( m a T. o t t o p n e l C I ; = y r f r n i d t o p P oi t s r d sl y i s i n g i s p s 4 e v e m s o s r A C c a i f o o l a d u v o i F m o u r i V C e p 0 P u o d e r e h t b n t f o i . s h c s u f C I c v y M = e r 2 a t . s d h n a a d a e t 4 n f g o ti d ti s e h a n e i i n i n d i v t t e t e r = h c t et f P A n ; e d W 2 i i c Q a l a t e d n d d n v i o i t a s d u at f a Cc i f a ; ) y l a p e a r e a e c c e i x e l o h n o s s n ; x e c i t s ( n ht r e 2 p o r s y e r l l o a l u y d e g u a p i k i si g e e d d o e c c i t o i n a o C o c i r b n i n a e 1 w b o e e p e d t r . h ) p h c r h t t r n s s u a r t n i y a d e t w t e g n oi t r a n s n y a p o i t t n s m e t k o D m d r e e f i s r p a p a u r r a i e c n r e e a o o f e v m m i e c a r n b t d d n n o a d s l n e a r o e d h t f n e y n a n i m r m s k y t p s r e ht i il e s d o m m a i a d e e p o n a a t o i t e e i v i a p a w a c r e b u h d h p m r s o e s o t d e o G d o t 2 w ti s d e p s t c o v d = I = e n = f r C d m c d e t 2 n e t c a e e c o a M V I e l e y K p E g , n e e i - s e r u p r u e d c t s s s n r e l r l o e l l a e e l n o i C m g s e n i u B H h n o i ; y ; t P e; ) s a b o i d t s s f a s c o c l t p y c e O e e r e d o Bm ( c a o d s e s i e a hf r a Vf n g i m i l s b it e p u i m G e f s r e t c s s n r e a oi t a s b o e s o s e s e a i t d n a n y a t s e s a a n C t u e l r d l s l d n g a t y E o d n o a s h l o o t a u e i 4 c d l a k r u o a h c p m o d e t s t u z o p d o d m a t p e i fi o e p n e r d n e i d c l - e 2 l n e 1 u i d h r e t v e a m s e t a c e t s e i w s e l l n o i s n c , m l s a e v e it n ul a o oi r y s u h t e a f = n i Am r t b o i e t p u s q r w s r = s T a h e t h d l p c c r o c s u .t c c d r o e i e v A u l i D E p a c s e me r a e f s e l l s n e o o c r o v e . d D h - 2 = c i l s i m r a a r e l o y v s i e r t a r t n a A : p o K D p i rt h t e f o s f I r . D s e e l t i s p c n a e si r t . g i o t a f o s m ; P . m 2 f e c n t i t s d p i n n e e e ; e s ( e n P p o g p o i t d m n o d n s c n a i d e a s e h t o e h t e f C i t a s i v e v n c a it r o i o t i t a a t i H t l i b a e i r s G e ll a s t c v e l o d , s o O s o e s a c e Vp y n I e r e e s e a p c e l l v e = m c r i P o d C E o c KD j n e o l o n m i af h v Bml p jP kP l I r B m d nI t o I pT e h m i e h o b i o p q T t t r C b A H C a PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO n e yb p mt e i l v i u t - w 4 1 X X X l a n o i t p O ( p u -w o l l o F e s o D e l pi t l u M r o f d oi r e P p u -w o l l o Ff o d n E h g u o r h T 7 5 o y e a d i D d – n v a r s l e ) o e a A e i t t i o t D n v A o h i t m e p ( c n u r d i t A o i y f t e l o a s p e n ( ) e p t o e l ) i t l m s e n yt i y l o m e u 3 t a x s t e t a v i t p s n r d e r h o e n y c p c c h n l o o i t a e c m n D a n o i c a P P s , g f g o u C y i d e r h t d a c i m r S C a i e n s y r u y n r r A t g f e o f C ( O V a i d r a c d e i o f r ) i y h s s i r s , y ti f t s t e p y a m a p a e G C m c D x y c p e d e m E e e e l n i d d c i o t n e y i t m e t n e e h g n o s i ni e l p r e s r n e n e t a f a n a v b : a ( 8 D l t a i n e t c o l t a s i s r u p m a p e k g o m p s ti e e y a e l y w b d o a d c i v g i a l s e r s l c i l a o c i t l a u y l / m s o r r a n s w w m o s r m a u m g a m u a s d o p m u s e e i e i c e t i T t n i y S W h b a t p i n i P b A i V r T l C e a H o n i C r r o e o m s v U e S K P l B e r f i B m I s A e v R e n R o v s i C d A aV PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO l a n . o l e t d a s e i t e h i v t r y l r l a n r e m r d e d l a e a o - a e n i t r d a c f o t d n n i s r o = a v e n i l v e o n a c F = a s t ei a a t c y a y t t e f C I C h b d p e a f a ; n O y e e t e a s o i V ; m h t c h s t f e l l t s y s t n t a ) s ( n o o c w n e a a n p s i s c m i t e i t % a 0 e i b v i ci t e r r e e t n i p 8 , r y e r a r d d o e a p d a yl k r o c oi e m e l r g e n A n g i a i o t a e a m P a r D s r e t l a d n = r T a h p l A u - a f m o d t d c i a E p n i , n ; = w r e i l i o n f i l c e r m a r K o l l o n e m s a u e h e t h g P o i ; ) F a e o t s e q r y r d h r e d s b r ( c i t f d o e s s o n a r a i o c r a c c o m a d r t y s r t n n u t . e e e e h a g e e d c y r ni t r r i t o s h t e e e e l r di e d o = c e e v u f v u t p a h t t a d a h n s e l n I s n e G m p . C r a l r a e e ) p e e v h e t m h o y l g n i E ; h p l i a a T t o e m s s . t i p n g y a = a l y a d s i v n i o i s wD e n i o t l l p n u o t s h s F h C t e d a P; s e 0 a m 0 i ti e c a u f I r 1 d d h t e r p d i c t e t h t et f e v i a b i e f P h n a . t o a s r u at f o a t a c i t f c m i x e d o i h n s s n i n r e c o n s a l v g e a l y h o r u a o p r i k c i s g e tl a a t i r e b a t r t % e 0 b P r p p 8r s o , a n e r h t r a n o s t n e t a y r p i t c n o a h A a r c e e m e n i h a i e h e f v e e l m e g yt T n i v D o y t l a dr t h n i e p a i a i E - t i e e t i l a s r m o d e r t l c 2 v i ti h p a wc c e a a K v c : n e d s a n y p s a t e o c d l a P y m P r A n o a e s b d n i e o g s A h C t e n C l i t . . e d e d r e e p e C m e n i u n o i r ; y m a t y m r O e e d u i o n t u m n i d s o h a t a b r ti hf o f V n o r f o g i s m e l s o d b i s t s a e k t o c n , e e p s e a i t n n a t o r e u e a t w d s i ms e m d n . t a s g p i e r 2 e t t 1 e s u l e r a c b o l e t d d t s p e i e t f o n t p a p n u e r d d = o y n r p p s e u m i l mm r o t c my s a u e i h c i v it t r e n a A T s e v o a s f ( e p C s q a e c d d r t a e s o s .t O d r o w e p r = D e AE - h y s t t i i e b o o l o l u b s n e V f o c r o i t v e e h t v d D 2 a A K . v s ; s i i i t V y a b c p m g f y n o n v o e n af e t e n r e t a r n . t g i i t o f s t o t f r o : s m s n n r i o r c a u ti i t o o h t ei s e d a o oi f e P - A w s i v s a i f t c e s f m o s t i s a p v v n n a p i e t t t c a i n e v i s C o ll s - e f I o i F h n T o l l a o c e e y n m s e r I e e s e h t e l l v e i s h v r s n u l c e h m i t n o b o c b c N dC e I t fA gT hT o i C b A c o PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 Study Rationale The fusion polypeptide described herein (anti-properdin/anti-serum albumin bispecific VHH antibody) is a novel properdin blocking agent being developed for the treatment of diseases involving dysregulated CAP activity. The fusion polypeptide described herein molecule is bispecific, comprising a VHH antibody domain that binds and blocks properdin connected via a linker to a VHH domain that binds serum albumin, thereby conferring an extended circulatory half-life to the molecule. The fusion polypeptide described herein binds to properdin with a high affinity to prevent stabilization of the CAP complement component C3 (C3) and complement component C5 (C5) convertases that cleave C3 and C5 into their activation products. Quantitative blockade of properdin has been shown to be safe in human based on experience with the properdin binding antibody (see Section 4.3). The fusion polypeptide described herein is currently being evaluated in an ongoing Phase 1 study in healthy adult participants, and doses and dosing regimens for participants in this study were determined using cumulative safety data and an interim PK/PD analysis from participants enrolled in the ongoing Phase 1 study as well as data from the 6-month GLP toxicology in monkeys. The purpose of this study in patients with SCD is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, PK, PD, and immunogenicity of multiple doses and dosing regimens of the fusion polypeptide described herein administered subcutaneously. The study includes up to 3 cohorts with multiple SC doses and dosing regimens of the open-label fusion polypeptide described herein in adult patients with SCD. Data from this study are anticipated to help design future studies in patients with SCD and other complement-mediated diseases. 2.2 Background A detailed description of the chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology data available for the fusion polypeptide described herein is provided in the Investigator’s Brochure (IB). 2.2.1 Chemistry The fusion polypeptide described herein is a recombinant, humanized VHH bispecific antibody that binds to human properdin and serum albumin. The antibody consists of a single polypeptide chain of 256 amino acids, which is comprised of an anti-albumin domain at the N-terminus that is fused to a C-terminal anti-properdin domain via a 15 amino acid linker. The variable region domains that form the serum albumin and properdin binding sites consist of llama complementarity determining regions grafted into human germline frameworks. Within the framework regions, llama residues at 11 positions were left unchanged to maintain antigen binding, aqueous solubility, and overall stability. There are 2 intrachain disulfide bonds, 1 disulfide bond localized in each VHH domain. The theoretical average molecular mass of the antibody is 27,350.2 Da. At pH 7.4, the fusion polypeptide described herein exhibited a binding dissociation constant (KD) of 323 pM for human properdin and KD of 439 pM for human serum albumin. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO The IC50 for blockade of human CAP hemolysis by the fusion polypeptide described herein (20% v/v final serum) was 29 nM. The fusion polypeptide described herein blocked C3 fragment, properdin and complement component C9 (C9) deposition onto a myeloperoxidase substrate by human serum (20%v/v) with IC50 values of approximately 20 nM (C3), 15 nM (properdin) and 19 nM (C9). 2.2.2 Nonclinical Pharmacology In a study of the potency of blockade of in vitro CAP hemolysis by the fusion polypeptide described herein using sera across a range of species, significant species cross reactivity was observed only when using sera from cynomolgus and rhesus macaque. CAP hemolytic activities in the sera of mouse, rat, guinea pig, minipig, beagle and rabbit were not inhibited by the highest concentration of the fusion polypeptide described herein examined (> 100 μg/mL). The IC 50 for blockade of cynomolgus CAP hemolysis by the fusion polypeptide described herein (20% v/v final serum) was 47 nM. The fusion polypeptide described herein exhibited a binding KD of 2.9 nM for cynomolgus properdin and KD of 2.1 nM for cynomolgus serum albumin. The fusion polypeptide described herein blocked C3 fragment, properdin and C9 deposition onto a myeloperoxidase substrate by cynomolgus monkey serum (20%v/v) with IC 50 values of approximately 11 nM (C3), 9 nM (properdin) and 17 nM (C9). The lack of species cross reactivity beyond primates described above prevented testing the biologic activity of the fusion polypeptide described herein in traditional rodent models of diseases involving dysregulated complement activity. Collectively therefore, the nonclinical in vitro and in vivo studies to assess the pharmacologic, PK, PD and toxicologic properties of the fusion polypeptide described herein are being performed in cynomolgus monkeys. 2.2.3 Toxicology Nonclinical safety profile of the fusion polypeptide described herein has been evaluated in an in vitro GLP tissue cross reactivity (TCR) study and in both a non-GLP and GLP in vivo studies in cynomolgus monkeys. In GLP toxicology studies the fusion polypeptide described herein was administered by intravenous (IV) administration (up to single dose of 100 mg/kg) and SC administration (up to 26 weekly doses of 300 mg/kg/week). The fusion polypeptide described herein did not demonstrate any non-specific binding to human tissues in the TCR study. Based on the absence of any adverse systemic or local toxicity in cynomolgus monkeys, 300 mg/kg/week was considered the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for SC administration and 100 mg/kg was considered as the NOAEL for IV administration of the fusion polypeptide described herein. Systemic exposures (maximum observed serum concentration [Cmax] and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 168 hours [AUC0- 168 ] of 8,570 µg/mL and 1,160,000 µg∙hr/mL, respectively), after the last dose at the NOAEL in the SC group, yielded exposure multiples of ~30-fold to the projected exposures at the anticipated human dose of 300 mg QW. Antidrug antibodies, when observed in a very small number of monkeys, did not have any impact on systemic exposure or toxicity profile. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 2.3 Benefit/Risk Assessment There may be potential benefits to patients with SCD (See Section 2.3.2). Identified and potential risks are described below. More detailed information about the known and expected benefits and risks and reasonably expected AEs of the fusion polypeptide described herein may be found in the IB. Potential risk mitigation strategies are described in Table 9. 2.3.1 Risk Assessment Besides the first-in-human (FIH) Phase 1 study in healthy participants, this study is the second human exposure to the fusion polypeptide described herein and the first exposure to patients with SCD. As there is limited clinical experience to date, the potential risks are based on the class of the molecule and its mechanism of action. No potential risks were identified from the repeat dose toxicity study in cynomolgus monkeys with the fusion polypeptide described herein after 26 weekly SC doses up to 300 mg/kg/week or after a single IV dose up to 100 mg/kg and no safety concerns in healthy participants have been identified as of 11 Mar 2022 after 5 weekly SC doses up to 150 mg or after a single SC dose of 1200 mg. 2.3.1.1 Neisseria meningitidis Infections Increased susceptibility to infection with Neisseria meningitidis is a known risk associated with properdin deficiency and has been well described with properdin-deficient patients (Figueroa, 1991). Similar to properdin deficiency, the main risk associated with the use of the fusion polypeptide described herein (properdin inhibitor) is expected to be the risk of meningococcal infections. Specific risk mitigation measures are in place to address this risk. Clinically, the risk of N. meningitidis is mitigated in patients with properdin deficiency by vaccinating all patients against N. meningitidis with tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) and serogroup B vaccines before dosing. Patients are vaccinated with MCV4 and serogroup B meningococcal vaccinations at least 14 days before dosing, if not already vaccinated within 3 years before the first dose (or per national/local guidelines). Participants who initiate study intervention treatment less than 14 days after receiving a meningococcal vaccine must receive treatment with appropriate prophylactic antibiotics until at least 2 weeks after vaccination. Every effort should be made to start the meningococcal vaccination series at least 14 days prior to randomization. Additionally, participants may be treated with prophylactic antibiotics at the Investigator’s discretion. 2.3.1.2 Immunogenicity and Hypersensitivity The fusion polypeptide described herein has the potential to be immunogenic and may be associated with hypersensitivity reactions. Some healthy participants are also known to have pre-existing PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO antibody to VHH antibodies. Antibodies to the fusion polypeptides described herein have been observed in 14 of 100 healthy participant serum samples tested in an in vitro screening assay. Monitoring of immunogenicity for the fusion polypeptides described herein in place for this study as specified in the SoA (Section 1.3). Table 9: Potential Risks and Mitigation Strategies Potential Risk of Summary of Data/Rationale for Mitigation Strategy Clinical Significance Risk n 2.3.1.3 Coronavirus Disease 2019 The SARS-COV-2 disease (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) global pandemic is active in many countries at the time of this protocol amendment. Given this unique circumstance, specific consideration PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO has been given to the risks and benefits of the study as they may be related to COVID-19, and the global and local changes that exist as a result of the pandemic. 2.3.2. Benefit Assessment The potential benefit of the fusion polypeptide described herein treatment for SCD is being measured by assessments of anemia and hemolysis. An increase in hemoglobin by ≥ 1g/dL from baseline is considered clinically meaningful. In addition, a positive treatment effect would also be shown by a decrease in hemolysis, including improvements in the serum levels of markers of hemolysis (i.e., lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], indirect bilirubin, and haptoglobin). Other exploratory endpoints (vaso-occlusive crisis [VOC], etc.) may be assessed. 2.3.2 Overall Benefit: Risk Conclusion The fusion polypeptide described herein has been and is being evaluated in an ongoing Phase 1 study. The study described herein is the second human exposure to the fusion polypeptide described herein. The present study is conducted in patients with SCD, and dosing is initiated based on review of safety, tolerability, and PK/PD data from the Phase 1 study. The doses administered in the current study are expected to produce exposure lower than the highest exposure tested in the previous study, and the expected exposure in patients is lower than the NOAEL exposure established in 6-week and 6-month GLP monkey toxicology studies. Strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, with a robust safety monitoring and risk mitigation plan are in place. A DMC evaluates the available study data at prespecified time points for participant safety and make recommendations on dose modification or termination of the study. The selected doses are intended to deliver complete inhibition of properdin, providing potential benefit of the fusion polypeptide described herein to patients with SCD, with a positive benefit/risk ratio. The data obtained from this study is expected to inform future clinical studies in patients with SCD.
PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 3. OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS The study objectives and corresponding endpoints are presented in Table 10. Table 10: Mapping Objectives to Endpoints for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease Objectives Endpoints Primar l l e s ., d s SC = subcutaneous; SCD = sickle cell disease; TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse event; VOC = vaso-occlusive crisis. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 4. STUDY DESIGN 4.1 Overall Design This is a Phase 2a study, with up to 3 multiple dose cohorts of open-label SC of the fusion polypeptide described herein in adult patients with SCD (HbSS and HbSß 0 -thalassemia). The study is conducted in up to 30 adult patients with SCD enrolled in up to 3 open-label cohorts (Cohorts 1, 2 and 3 [optional]) to receive multiple SC doses of the open-label fusion polypeptide described herein. The fusion polypeptide described herein is administered as described in Table 11. Table 11: The Fusion Polypeptide Dosing Cohorts Cohort N Study Drug Route of Planned Dose Number of Administration Doses/Dose ce The dose and dosing intervals for Cohorts 1 and 2 were determined using cumulative safety data, an interim PK/PD analysis from participants enrolled in the Phase 1 study, and data from the 6-month GLP toxicology study in monkeys. Optional Cohort 3 is initiated after evaluation of safety and PK/PD data from Cohorts 1 and 2. Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 run in parallel, and patients are randomized 1:1 to either of the cohorts on determination of eligibility. The decision to initiate Optional Cohort 3 is made at the discretion of the Investigator and is based on analysis of PK/PD and safety after at least 8 patients from Cohorts 1 and 2 (4 from each cohort) have enrolled. Furthermore, enrollment of Optional Cohort 3 starts after Cohorts 1 and 2 are fully enrolled. Each cohort is stratified to ensure patients with SCD who are treated with a stable dose of hydroxyurea and patients with SCD who are not currently treated with hydroxyurea are included. For patients who were previously treated with hydroxyurea but are not currently on hydroxyurea, treatment must be stopped at least 30 days prior to providing informed consent. This study uses an independent DMC to monitor safety and to perform the planned interim analyses of the study. At the discretion of the Investigator, and after consultation with the DMC, additional PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO participants with SCD may be enrolled as replacement participants if a participant discontinues during the Dosing Period for reasons other than drug related AEs. 4.2 Scientific Rationale for Study Design The initial indication for the fusion polypeptide described herein is SCD. SCD affects about 20 to 25 million people worldwide (Aliyu, 2008) and in the US, approximately 100,000 people are affected (Hassell, 2010). The prevalence of SCD newborns and SCD carriers in the EU is approximately 1 to 5 in 10,000 and 1 in 150, respectively (Engert, 2016). The few available life expectancy estimates for SCD patients in the US or EU vary widely from 45 to 65 years which is approximately 20 years lower than the general population (Gardner, 2016; Lubeck, 2019; Payne, 2020; Platt, 1994). SCD is a group of inherited disorders. A mutation in the β-hemoglobin gene is responsible for the synthesis of sickle hemoglobin (HbS). The most common genotypes in SCD are HbSS, HbSC, and HbSβ + thalassemia. The most common clinical manifestations of SCD are chronic hemolysis and VOC (Kato, 2018; Pecker, 2021). HbS has abnormal physicochemical properties and is prone to polymerization under low oxygen concentration causing deformation of red blood cells (RBCs) with the characteristic sickle shape. Sickling has numerous adverse outcomes on RBCs and on multiple organs. Sickled RBCs have limited life span due to hemolysis. Hemolysis is thought to occur principally through extravascular phagocytosis (approximately 2/3) and intravascular (approximately 1/3) hemolysis, which leads to anemia. Intravascular hemolysis of sickle RBCs leads to release of free hemoglobin, which in turn activates CAP (via free heme) and depletes nitric oxide, contributing to endothelial damage. Hemolysis and sickling of the RBCs leads to endothelial cell activation with increased adhesion molecule expression and activation of neutrophils, monocytes, and platelets (Kato, 2018). VOC, as a result of these processes, leads to obstruction of blood flow to vital organs such as the kidneys, liver, lungs, and heart, promoting ischemia, acute episodes of pain, and necrosis. The ensuing ischemic/reperfusion injury leads to the generation of reactive oxygen species. This in turn leads to a chronic inflammatory state (Kato, 2018; Piel, 2017). Patients also have increased vulnerability to infections, particularly from encapsulated bacteria, as a result of functional or actual asplenia. Together, these mechanisms contribute to the development of chronic organ damage including sickle nephropathy, pulmonary hypertension, avascular necrosis of the bone, chronic lung disease, and shortened life expectancy (Kato, 2018). Universal newborn screening is established in the US to enable early diagnosis and treatment of infants with SCD to reduce morbidity and mortality. It is recommended that all infants with HbSS and HbSβ 0 -thalassemia receive penicillin prophylaxis and 23-valent-pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine to prevent invasive pneumococcal disease (Kato, 2018; Pecker, 2021). Hydroxyurea, RBC transfusion, and opioids are the treatments commonly used to manage the symptoms of SCD. There are several approved novel drugs for the treatment of sickle cell complications in recent years: L-glutamine (Endari ® ), voxelotor (Oxbryta ® ), and crizanlizumab (Adakveo ® ). However, none of PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO these treatments addresses both anemia (hemolysis) and VOC. The only curative treatment option for SCD is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, this is reserved for severe patients due to the risk of life-threatening complications (Pecker, 2021). Recently, much attention has been given to the role of the innate immune system in SCD, and in particular the role of complement activation in the pathophysiology of SCD (Tampaki, 2021; Varelas, 2021). In Investigator-initiated studies, eculizumab has demonstrated clinical effect in SCD patients with delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction, VOC, and drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (Chonat, 2020). Compared to C5 inhibitors, CAP inhibitors have potential advantages in treatment of SCD. An increasing number of publications support the hypothesis that sickle RBCs are the focal point of CAP activation, which triggers C3 opsonization on the cell surface as well as complement-mediated RBC hemolysis. Intravascular hemolysis is one of the main causes of anemia and also contributes to further amplification of CAP activation by releasing free heme from RBCs. C3 opsonization of sickle RBCs also promotes anemia through extravascular hemolysis via the reticuloendothelial system. Furthermore, C3 opsonization has been shown to be a key contributor to VOC. It has also been demonstrated that C3 opsonization can be precipitated by exposure of phosphatidyl serine on sickle RBCs and contributes to VOC by enhancing its interaction with adhesion molecules such as P-selectin and complement receptor 3 on activated endothelial cells (Lombardi, 2019). Thus, SCD nonclinical literature collectively underscores the role of CAP activation in SCD pathophysiology. The fusion polypeptide described herein binds with high affinity to human properdin, which is a component of the CAP, preventing it from stabilizing the CAP C3 and C5 convertases that cleave C3 and C5 into their activation products. By binding properdin, the fusion polypeptide described herein prevents activation of the alternative complement system and thereby has the potential to treat SCD. In support of this, studies carried out in a mouse model of SCD demonstrated that pretreatment of animals with a mouse anti-properdin antibody significantly ameliorated signs of hemolysis and vaso-occlusion, which are 2 main clinical features of SCD. The current nonclinical data and data from the first in human study support further investigation of the fusion polypeptide described herein as a potential for treatment of patients with SCD. This study is designed to allow preliminary evaluation of changes in SCD disease-related biomarkers and to guide the design of further clinical studies in patients with SCD. 4.3 Justification for Dose The dose and the frequency of dosing is based on all available data including the overall safety, tolerability, PK/PD modeling from the ongoing cohorts in the Phase 1 study; available nonclinical data including PK, PD, and efficacy in SCD mouse models, and toxicology data from the GLP 6-week and 6- month studies in cynomolgus monkeys. A preliminary PK/PD model has been established based on data from the Phase 1 study in healthy participants. This semi-mechanistic model assumed monovalent fusion polypeptides described PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO herein binding to trimeric properdin with 3 binding sites. The relationship between free properdin and CAP activity was characterized by a sigmoidal E max model. The model provided good fits to the observed data (the fusion polypeptide described herein, total and free properdin, and CAP activity) judged by the model diagnostics. To estimate the therapeutic dose in SCD patients, the following assumptions have been made: ^ Complete suppression of CAP activity (<1% of baseline activity) is needed for clinical efficacy based on data from mouse SCD model (described in detail in the fusion polypeptide described herein IB) ^ The baseline properdin concentration is about 20% higher in sickle cell patients than in healthy subjects (Strauss, 1977) In addition, the fusion polypeptide described herein clearance in sickle cell patients was set as similar to or 40% higher (seen in other antibody treatments for SCD (Crizanlizumab, 2019)) than that of the healthy participants to evaluate the impact of increased clearance on exposure and CAP inhibition. Based on these assumptions and analysis, it is predicted that a dose of 300 mg QW could inhibit the CAP activity to < 1% of the baseline values (upper limit of the 90% prediction interval) and maintain this effect during the Treatment Period. A dose of 600 mg Q4W or 300 mg Q2W was also shown to inhibit the CAP activity < 1% during majority of the dosing interval. The CAP activity slowly recovers and returns to baseline after terminating dosing of the fusion polypeptide described herein. The safety margin at 300 mg QW is approximately 30-fold based on the NOAEL exposure established in the 6-month (or 26-week) monkey toxicology study. The safety margin at 600 mg Q4W or 300 mg Q2W is approximately 60-fold, based on the NOAEL exposure. 4.4 End of Study Definition A participant is considered to have completed the study if he/she has completed all phases of the study including the last scheduled procedure shown in the SoA (Section 1.3). The end of the study (EOS) is defined as the date the last participant completes the last visit as shown in the SoA (Section 1.3).
PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 5. STUDY POPULATION Prospective approval of protocol deviations to recruitment and enrollment criteria, also known as protocol waivers or exemptions, is not permitted. 5.1 Inclusion Criteria Age 1. Participant must be 18 to 65 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent. Type of Participant and Disease Characteristics 2. Confirmed diagnosis of SCD (HbSS, or HbSβ 0 -thalassemia). Weight 3. Body weight ≥ 40 kg (inclusive) at Screening. Sex 4. Contraceptive use by men or women should be consistent with local regulations regarding the methods of contraception for those participating in clinical studies. Female participants of childbearing potential and male participants with female partners of childbearing potential must be willing to follow protocol-specified contraception guidance while on treatment and for at least 6 months after last dose of study drug. Other Inclusion Criteria 5. Hemoglobin between 5.5 and 10 g/dL at Screening. 6. Have had 1 to 10 VOCs in the past 12 months. 7. Patients receiving hydroxyurea must have been on a stable dose for ≥ 3months prior to providing informed consent, with no anticipated need for dose adjustment during the study. For patients who previously used hydroxyurea but are not currently on hydroxyurea treatment (due to non-responsiveness, intolerance, or unwillingness to take hydroxyurea), hydroxyurea treatment must have been discontinued at least 30 days prior to providing informed consent. 8. Patients are vaccinated with MCV4 and serogroup B meningococcal vaccinations at least 14 days before dosing, if not already vaccinated within 3 years before the first dose (or per national/local guidelines). Participants who initiate study intervention treatment less than 14 days after receiving a meningococcal vaccine must receive treatment with appropriate prophylactic antibiotics until at least 2 weeks after vaccination. 9. Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccination are up to date according to current national/local vaccination guidelines for patients with SCD. 10. Must be willing to abide by all study requirements and restrictions. Informed Consent 11. Capable of giving signed informed consent (or assent, as applicable), which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the ICF and in this protocol. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 5.2 Exclusion Criteria Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply: 1. Planned initiation, termination, or dose alteration of hydroxyurea during the study. 2. Receiving Voxelotor (OXBRYTA) or crizanlizumab (ADAKVEO) within 60 days of providing informed consent. 3. Receiving treatment with recombinant human erythropoetins (e.g., epoetin alfa). 4. Treated with complement inhibitors within 6 months prior to the first dose. 5. Patients who are on chronic transfusion or receive a transfusion within 60 days of first dose. 6. Any significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may put the participant at risk. 7. History of complement deficiency. 8. History of N meningitidis, S pneumoniae, or H influenzae infection. 9. History of malignancy with the exception of a nonmelanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence within 5 years. 10. Evidence of hepatitis B (positive hepatitis surface antigen [HBsAg] or positive core antibody (anti- HBc) with negative surface antibody [anti-HBs]) or hepatitis C viral infection (hepatitis C virus [HCV] antibody positive, except for patients with documented successful treatment and documented sustained virologic response) at Screening. 11. Active systemic bacterial, viral, or fungal infection within 14 days prior to dosing. Prior/Concurrent Clinical Study Experience 12. Participation (i.e., last protocol-required study visit) in a clinical study within 90 days or 5 half-lives of the investigational agent, whichever is longer, before initiation of dosing on Day 1. 13. Participation in more than 1 clinical study of a monoclonal antibody (mAb), or participation (i.e., last protocol required study visit) in a clinical study of a mAb within the 6 months or 5 half-lives of the mAb, whichever is longer, prior to Screening, during which the participant was exposed to the active study drug. Diagnostic assessments 14. Severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) or on chronic dialysis. Other Exclusions 15. Female participants who are pregnant or breastfeeding. 16. History of allergy or hypersensitivity to excipients of the fusion polypeptide described herein (e.g., polysorbate 80). 5.3 Lifestyle Considerations Not applicable, the present study described herein does not include any specific lifestyle considerations. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 5.4 Screen Failures Screen failures are defined as participants who consent to participate in the clinical study but are not subsequently assigned to study drug due to failure to meet eligibility criteria. A minimal set of screen failure information is required to ensure transparent reporting of screen failure participants to meet the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials publishing requirements and to respond to queries from regulatory authorities. Minimal information includes demography, screen failure details (e.g., failed eligibility criteria), and any AEs, including any SAEs and any related concomitant medication, occurring during the Screening Period. Participants who do not meet the criteria for participation in this study (i.e., screen failures) due to a reason that is expected to resolve or has resolved may be rescreened based on discussion and agreement between the Investigator and the Medical Monitor. Any abnormal laboratory parameter(s) results outside of the reference range at Screening may be repeated per the Investigator’s discretion for the purpose of further determining eligibility.
PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 6. STUDY INTERVENTION Study intervention is defined as any investigational intervention(s), marketed product(s), placebo, or medical device(s) intended to be administered to a study participant according to the study protocol. For the present study described herein, the study intervention is the fusion polypeptide described herein and also referred to as study drug throughout this study protocol. 6.1 Study Intervention Administered The study drug composition of the fusion polypeptide described herein and doses to be administered (open-label, SC) in this study are presented in Table 12. Table 12: Dose Reference Chart for Study Characteristics Subcutaneous Fusion Polypeptides Dosa e formulation The fusion ol e tide described herein is formulated at H 54 and each vial l unscheduled dose is determined by the study Clinical Pharmacologist on an individual basis. 6.2 Preparation/Handling/Storage/Accountability Details regarding preparation, handling, storage, accountability, and administration of the study drug are discussed below. Additional guidance is provided in the pharmacy manual. 1. The fusion polypeptide described herein is to be stored at 2 - 8°C. The Investigator or designee must confirm appropriate temperature conditions have been maintained during transit for all study drug received and any discrepancies are reported and resolved before use of the study drug. 2. Only participants enrolled in the study may receive study drug and only authorized site staff may supply or administer study drug. All study drugs must be stored in a secure, environmentally controlled, and monitored (manual or automated) area in accordance with the labeled storage conditions with access limited to the Investigator and authorized site staff. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 3. The pharmacy staff at the Investigator’s site are responsible for study drug accountability, reconciliation, and record maintenance (i.e., receipt, reconciliation, and final disposition records). The site’s pharmacy assembles the supplies into individual, labelled participant dose syringes and perform Qualified Person certification of the assembled product. Further guidance regarding preparation, handling, storage, and accountability and information for the final disposition of unused study intervention is provided in the Pharmacy Manual. 6.3 Measures to Minimize Bias: Randomization and Blinding All eligible participants who meet all inclusion and no exclusion criteria in Cohorts 1, 2, and optional Cohort 3 receive the open-label fusion polypeptide described herein. 6.4 Study Intervention Compliance The administration of study intervention to participants are under the supervision of the Investigator or their designee to ensure that participants receive the appropriate dose at the appropriate time points during the study. The date and time of each dose administered in the clinic is recorded in the source documents and case report form (CRF). The dose of study intervention and study participant identification is confirmed at the time of dosing by a member of the study site staff other than the person administering the study intervention. For additional information on study intervention compliance and management, refer to the Pharmacy Manual. 6.5 Concomitant Therapy Any medication (including over-the-counter or prescription medicines, vitamins, and/or herbal supplements), vaccine, or other specific categories of interest that the participant is receiving at the time of enrollment or receives during the study must be recorded along with: ^ Reason for use ^ Dates of administration including start and end dates ^ Dosage information including dose and frequency The Medical Monitor should be contacted if there are any questions regarding concomitant or prior therapy. 6.5.1 Allowed Medicine and Therapy Multivitamins, contraceptives, and paracetamol (i.e., acetaminophen, at doses of ^ 2 g/day) are permitted for use during the study at the Investigator’s discretion. Topical skin products should not be administered at the site of study drug injection from 24 hours prior until 24 hours following study drug administration. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO See Section 8.2.8 for details on administration and duration of treatment with prophylactic antibiotics as concomitant medication to mitigate the risk of N. meningitidis infection associated with complement inhibition. Other concomitant medication may be considered on a case-by-case basis by the Investigator in consultation with the Medical Monitor if required. Concomitant procedures are not allowed unless medically indicated. Medication and therapy for SCD are allowed except for those presented in Section 6.5.2. 6.5.2 Disallowed Medicine and Therapy During the Screening and Treatment Period, if patients are not currently treated with hydroxyurea, hydroxyurea should not be initiated. If patients are on stable dose of hydroxyurea, the dose of hydroxyurea should not be altered or terminated. The use of voxelotor, crizanlizumab, erythropoetins, other complement inhibitors, and transfusion are not allowed. If any of the above medication/therapy is used, the patient is discontinued as per Section 7.1. The above medications/therapy are allowed during the safety Follow-Up period. 6.6 Dose Modification Decisions to continue or modify dosing are made by the Investigator and/or DMC after review of the safety data. The DMC may also make recommendations regarding safety issues, study conduct, or study suspension. 6.7 Intervention After the End of the Study No follow-up intervention is planned.
PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 7. DISCONTINUATION OF STUDY INTERVENTION AND PARTICIPANT DISCONTINUATION/WITHDRAWAL 7.1 Discontinuation of Study Intervention In rare instances, it may be necessary for a participant to permanently discontinue (definitive discontinuation) the study intervention. If the study intervention is definitively discontinued, the participant should remain in the study to be evaluated for safety follow-up. See the SoA for data to be collected at the time of discontinuation of study intervention and follow-up and for any further evaluations that need to be completed (Section 1.3). 7.2 Stopping Criteria 7.2.1 Individual Stopping Rules Participants should be considered for discontinuation from intervention if any of the following occur during the study: ^ Serious hypersensitivity reaction; ^ Grade 3 or higher injection site reactions; ^ Severe uncontrolled infection; ^ Serious N meningitidis, S pneumoniae, or H influenzae infections; ^ Use of disallowed medication as defined in Section 6.5.2; ^ Pregnancy or planned pregnancy; or ^ Any AE, laboratory abnormality, or intercurrent illness which, in the judgment of the Investigator, presents a substantial clinical risk to the patient with continued study drug dosing. 7.2.2 Study Stopping Rules The study may be terminated at the recommendation of the DMC, if the following occur and are deemed to be related to the study drug: ^ Two or more meningococcal infections; ^ Two or more serious (≥ Grade 3) pneumococcal infections; ^ Two or more serious (≥ Grade 3) H influenzae infections; ^ One meningococcal, pneumococcal, or H influenzae infection resulting in a fatal outcome. 7.3 Participant Discontinuation/Withdrawal From the Study All efforts should be made to ensure participants are willing to comply with study participation prior to conducting the screening procedures. The study staff should notify the Investigator and their site monitor of all study withdrawals as soon as possible. The reason for participant discontinuation must be recorded in the source documents and electronic case report form (eCRF). PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO A participant may withdraw from the study at any time at his/her own request, or may be withdrawn at any time at the discretion of the Investigator for safety, behavioral, compliance, or administrative reasons. This is expected to be uncommon. At the time of discontinuing from the study, if possible, an Early Discontinuation Visit should be conducted, as shown in the SoA (Section 1.3). Refer to the SoA for data to be collected at the time of study discontinuation and follow-up and for any further evaluations that need to be completed. The participant is permanently discontinued both from the study drug and from the study at that time. If the participant withdraws consent for disclosure of future information, the Investigator may retain and continue to use any data collected before such a withdrawal of consent. If a participant withdraws from the study, he/she may request destruction of any samples taken and not tested, and the Investigator must document this in the site study records. Participants who discontinue during the Screening or Dosing Period for reasons other than drug-related AEs may be replaced. 7.4 Lost to Follow-Up A participant is considered lost to follow-up if he or she repeatedly fails to return for scheduled visits and is unable to be contacted by the study site. The following actions must be taken if a participant fails to return to the clinic for a required study visit: ^ The site must attempt to contact the participant and reschedule the missed visit as soon as possible and counsel the participant on the importance of maintaining the assigned visit schedule and ascertain whether or not the participant wishes to and/or should continue in the study. ^ Before a participant is deemed lost to follow-up, the Investigator or designee must make every effort to regain contact with the participant (where possible, email, 3 telephone calls and, if necessary, a certified letter to the participant’s last known mailing address or local equivalent methods). These contact attempts should be documented in the participant’s medical record. ^ Should the participant continue to be unreachable, he/she is considered to lost to follow up.
PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 8. STUDY ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEDURES Study procedures and their timing are summarized in the SoA (Section 1.3). Protocol waivers or exemptions are not allowed. Immediate safety concerns should be discussed with the Investigator immediately upon occurrence or awareness to determine if the participant should continue or discontinue the fusion polypeptide described herein. Adherence to the study design requirements, including those specified in the SoA, is essential and required for study conduct. All screening evaluations must be completed and reviewed to confirm that potential participants meet all eligibility criteria. The Investigator maintains a screening log to record details of all participants screened and to confirm eligibility or record reasons for screening failure, as applicable. Procedures conducted as part of the participant’s routine clinical management (e.g., blood count) and obtained before signing of the ICF may be utilized for screening or baseline purposes provided the procedures met the protocol-specified criteria and were performed within the time frame defined in the SoA, if consistent with site standard operating procedures. 8.1 Efficacy Assessments Timing for collection of assessments for Cohort 1 is detailed in Section 1.3, Table 3, and Table 6. Timing for intensive collection of PK and PD samples for Cohorts 1 and 2 is detailed in Section 1.3, Table 5. Timing for collection of assessments for Cohort 2 are detailed in Section 1.3, Table 4 and Table 6. If conducted, timing for collection of assessments for optional Cohort 3 are detailed in Table 7 and Table 8. 8.1.1 Change in Complement Biomarkers The following complement markers (absolute and percentage change from baseline) is measured during the study: ^ complement component Ba (Ba) ^ complement component C3a (C3a) ^ soluble complement component C5B-9 (sC5B9) Other complement markers may be evaluated, if feasible. 8.1.2 Change in Biomarkers Related to VOC The following markers of VOC (absolute and percentage change from baseline) may be measured during the study: ^ Hemopexin ^ Nitric oxide PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO ^ Inflammatory markers (e.g., interleukin-1) ^ Cell adhesion markers (e.g., soluble P-selectin) Other markers may be evaluated, if feasible. 8.1.3 Change in Hemoglobin Blood samples are collected for assessment of hemoglobin changes from baseline. 8.1.4 Markers of Hemolysis The following markers of hemolysis are measured during the study: ^ Serum LDH levels ^ Absolute reticulocyte count ^ Serum indirect bilirubin ^ Serum haptoglobin and hemopexin 8.1.5 Assessment of VOC Sickle cell disease–related pain crises (VOC) are collected throughout the study per detailed in the SoA (Section 1.3). Patients are issued a paper diary to record symptoms of VOC after signing the informed consent. The diary is collected by the Investigator or designee at every visit to the site and a new diary is provided. 8.2 Safety Assessments Planned time points for all safety assessments for all cohorts are provided in the SoA (Section 1.3). 8.2.1 Physical Examination A complete physical examination includes, at a minimum, assessments of the general appearance; skin; head, ears, eyes, nose, and throat; neck; lymph nodes; chest; heart; abdominal cavity; limbs; central nervous system; and musculoskeletal system. An abbreviated physical examination includes, at a minimum, assessments of the skin, lungs, cardiovascular system, and abdomen (liver and spleen). Height, weight and BMI are recorded per Section 1.3, SoA. Investigators should pay special attention to clinical signs related to previous serious illnesses. 8.2.2 Vital Signs Vital sign measurements are taken after the participant has been resting in the supine or semi-recumbent position for at least 5 minutes and include temperature (tympanic or oral), respiratory PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO rate, supine blood pressure, and pulse. Ideally, the same arm for each participant should be used for BP and pulse measurements. Orthostatic (standing) blood pressure is only measured at Screening. The timing of vital sign measurements is described in the SoA (Section 1.3). Out of range blood pressure or pulse measurements is repeated at the Investigator’s discretion. Confirmed, clinically significant vital sign measurements is recorded as AEs. 8.2.3 Electrocardiograms Triplicate 12-lead ECGs are recorded at the time points described in the SoA (Section 1.3) to obtain heart rate, PR, QRS, and QT intervals.12-lead ECG recordings are made after the participants have been resting in a supine position for at least 10 minutes. At each time point at which triplicate ECGs are required, 3 individual ECG tracings should be obtained as closely as possible in succession but no more than 2 minutes apart. 8.2.3.1 Safety Review of 12-lead Electrocardiograms All recorded ECGs are reviewed by the Investigator or qualified designee. If a participant shows an abnormal ECG, additional safety recordings may be made, and the abnormality is followed to resolution. 8.2.4 Clinical Laboratory Assessments See Table 13 for the list of clinical laboratory tests to be performed and to the SoA (Section 1.3) for the timing and frequency. Clinical laboratory assessments are performed by a central laboratory unless otherwise specified. The Investigator must review the laboratory report, document this review, and record any clinically relevant changes occurring during the study in the AE section of the eCRF. The laboratory reports must be filed with the source documents. Clinically significant abnormal laboratory findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the Investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant’s condition. All laboratory tests with values considered clinically significantly abnormal during participation in the study should be repeated until the values return to normal or baseline or are no longer considered clinically significant by the Investigator or Medical Monitor. ^ If such values do not return to normal/baseline within a period of time judged reasonable by the Investigator, the etiology should be identified, and the Investigator notified. ^ All protocol-required laboratory assessments must be conducted in accordance with the Laboratory Manual and the SoA. If laboratory values from non-protocol specified laboratory assessments performed at the institution’s local laboratory require a change in participant management or are considered clinically PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO significant by the Investigator (e.g., SAE or AE or dose modification), then the results must be recorded in the eCRF. 8.2.5 Clinical Safety Laboratory Assessments 8.2.5.1 Virus Serology Blood samples collected at Screening are analyzed for HIV-1, HIV-2, HbsAg, HBc antibody (anti- HBc IgG + IgM, if IgG positive), and HCV antibody titers. 8.2.6 Injection Site Evaluation Subcutaneous injection site evaluations are performed at the time points specified in the SoA (Section 1.3). Injection site reactions are recorded as AEs unless deemed clinically significant. 8.2.7 Injection-associated Reactions Injection-associated reactions are defined as systemic AEs (e.g., fever, chills, flushing, alterations in heart rate and blood pressure, dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and generalized skin rashes) occurring during or within 24 hours of the start of SC injection that are assessed by the Investigator to be related to the study drug. 8.2.8 Vaccine and Antibiotic Prophylaxis To mitigate the risk of N. meningitidis infection associated with complement inhibition, participants are administered the following: 1. Patients are vaccinated with MCV4 and serogroup B meningococcal vaccinations, if available at least 14 days before dosing, if not already vaccinated within 3 years before the first dose (or per national/local guidelines). 2. Patients are treated with prophylactic antibiotics at the Investigator’s discretion. Patients must be vaccinated against other pathogens (e.g., Haemophiles influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae) according to current national/local guidelines. 8.3 Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events All AEs are reported to the Investigator or qualified designee by the participant (or, when appropriate, by a caregiver, surrogate, or the participant’s legally authorized representative). The Investigator and any qualified designees are responsible for detecting, documenting, and recording events that meet the definition of an AE or SAE and remain responsible for following up AEs that are serious, considered related to the study intervention or study procedures, or that caused the participant to discontinue the study intervention (see Section 7). PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 8.3.1 Time Period and Frequency for Collecting AE and SAE Information All AEs and SAEs are collected from the signing of the ICF until the last follow-up visit. All SAEs are recorded and reported to the Investigator or the designee immediately and under no circumstance should this exceed 24 hours. The Investigator submits any updated SAE data to the Investigator within 24 hours of the date the investigational site became aware of the event. Investigators are not obligated to actively seek AE or SAE data after conclusion of the study participation. However, if the Investigator learns of any SAE, including a death, at any time after a participant has been discharged from the study, and he/she considers the event to be reasonably related to the study intervention or study participation, the Investigator must promptly notify the Investigator. 8.3.2 Method of Detecting AEs and SAEs Care is taken not to introduce bias when detecting AEs and/or SAEs. Open-ended and non-leading verbal questioning of the participant is the preferred method to inquire about AE occurrences. 8.3.3 Follow-Up of AEs and SAEs After the initial AE/SAE report, the Investigator is required to proactively follow up on each participant at subsequent visits/contacts. All SAEs are followed up until resolution, stabilization, the event is otherwise explained, or the participant is lost to follow-up (as defined in Section 7.4). 8.3.4 Regulatory Reporting Requirements for SAEs Prompt notification of an SAE by the Investigator to the Investigator is essential so that legal obligations and ethical responsibilities towards the safety of participants and the safety of a study intervention under clinical investigation are met. The Investigator has a legal responsibility to notify both the local regulatory authority and other regulatory agencies about the safety of a study intervention under clinical investigation. The Investigator complies with country-specific regulatory requirements relating to safety reporting to the regulatory authority, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)/IECs, and Investigators. Suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions must be reported according to local regulatory requirements and forwarded to Investigators as necessary. An Investigator who receives an Investigator safety report describing an SAE or other specific safety information (e.g., summary or listing of SAEs) from the Investigator reviews and then files it along with the IB and notifies the IRB/IEC, if appropriate according to local requirements. 8.4 Treatment of Overdose For this study, any dose of study intervention greater than that specified in the protocol is considered an overdose. There is no specific treatment or antidote for overdose. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO Overdoses are medication errors that are not considered AEs unless there is an untoward medical occurrence resulting from the overdose. In the event of an overdose or suspected overdose, the Investigator should: 1. Contact the Medical Monitor immediately. 2. Closely monitor the participant for any AE/SAE. 3. Obtain a sample for PK/PD analysis if requested by the Medical Monitor (determined on a case- by-case basis). 4. Document the quantity of the excess dose as well as the duration of the overdose in the eCRF. Decisions regarding dose interruptions or modifications are made by the Investigator in consultation with the Medical Monitor based on the clinical evaluation of the participant. 8.5 Pharmacokinetics Whole blood samples are collected for measurement of serum concentrations of the fusion polypeptide described herein as specified in the SoA (Section 1.3). Additional samples may be collected at additional time points during the study if warranted and agreed upon with the Investigator. The total blood volume does not exceed the volume limit for participants per national/local guidelines. The timing of sampling may be altered during the course of the study, based on newly available data (e.g., to obtain data closer to the time of peak serum concentrations) to ensure appropriate monitoring. ^ Instructions for the collection and handling of biological samples are provided by the Investigator. The actual date and time (24-hour clock time) of each sample is recorded. ^ Samples are used to evaluate the PK of the fusion polypeptide described herein. Samples collected for analyses of the fusion polypeptide described herein serum concentration may also be used to evaluate safety or efficacy aspects related to concerns arising during or after the study. ^ Samples may be used for research to develop methods, assays, prognostics and/or companion diagnostics related to dysregulated complement activity. 8.6 Pharmacodynamics Whole blood samples are collected for measurement of serum total and free properdin concentrations, CAP activity, and potentially other measures of complement activation as specified in the SoA (Section 1.3). Additional samples may be collected at additional time points during the study if warranted and agreed upon with the Investigator, and upon receipt of consent from the study participant. The total blood volume does not exceed the blood volume limit for participants per national/local guidelines. The timing of sampling may be altered during the course of the study based on newly available data (e.g., to obtain data closer to the time of peak plasma concentrations) to ensure appropriate monitoring. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO Instructions for the collection and handling of biological samples are provided by the Investigator. The actual date and time (24-hour clock time) of each sample is recorded. Samples are used to evaluate the PD of the fusion polypeptide described herein. Samples collected for analyses of the fusion polypeptide described herein concentration may also be used to evaluate safety or efficacy aspects related to concerns arising during or after the study. Unused samples may be retained for a period of up to 25 years to perform additional assessments as necessary. 8.7 Genetics Genetics are not evaluated in this study. 8.8 Biomarkers Collection of samples for biomarker research (e.g., exploratory) is also part of this study. The following samples for biomarker research are required and are collected from all participants in this study as specified in the SoA (Section 1.3): ^ Blood ^ Urine Samples are collected for testing that may include, but are not limited to, markers of complement dysregulation, inflammation, and endothelial activation/damage. 8.9 Immunogenicity Assessments Antibodies to the fusion polypeptides (ADAs) are evaluated in whole blood samples collected from all participants according to the SoA (Section 1.3). Serum samples are screened for ADAs. If the screen is positive, the sample is analyzed using a confirmatory ADA assay and the titer of confirmed positive samples is reported. The detection and characterization of antibodies to the fusion polypeptide described herein is performed using a validated assay method by or under the supervision of the Investigator. Samples may be further characterized to determine the titer and the presence of neutralizing antibodies (as an exploratory analysis) if deemed necessary. The actual date and time (24-hour clock time) of each sample is recorded. Samples may be banked for a period of up to 25 years in order to perform additional safety assessments, as necessary. Detailed instructions on the procedure for collecting, processing, storing, and shipping serum samples for immunogenicity analysis are provided in the laboratory manual. 9. STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 9.1 Statistical Hypotheses Not applicable. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 9.2 Sample Size Determination Twelve participants are enrolled in each of Cohorts 1 and 2. In patients with stable SCD, hemoglobin level is unlikely to change. The sample size is determined based on a targeted hemoglobin change from baseline to exclude 0 g/dL with a lower 2-sided 95% confidence bound. Assuming a standard deviation of 1 g/dL, a sample size of 12 participants provides 88% power to detect a change from baseline of 1 g/dL with a 2-sided significance level of 0.05. In the optional Cohort 3, 6 participants are enrolled to define the exposure/response relationship of the fusion polypeptide described herein by combining Cohort 1, Cohort 2 and Cohort 3 data using a PK/PD modeling approach. The Cohort 3 sample size is not determined for power purposes. 9.3 Populations for Analyses For purposes of analysis, the following populations are defined: Population Description Safety All participants who receive at least 1 dose of study drug. e e cassca pa ay; = o e co se o ; = p a aco e c(s). 9.4 Statistical Analyses In general, descriptive statistics for continuous variables includes number of non-missing values, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum. Descriptive statistics for PK parameters include number of observations, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, arithmetic coefficient of variation (%CV), median, minimum, maximum, geometric mean, and geometric %CV. Categorical variables are summarized using percentages and frequency counts, by cohort and time point. A SAP is developed and finalized before first data cutoff/database lock and further describes the participant populations to be included in the analyses, and procedures for accounting for missing, unused, and spurious data as appropriate. This section is a high-level summary of the planned statistical analyses of the primary and secondary endpoints. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO 9.4.1 Efficacy Analyses 9.4.1.1 Change in Complement Biomarkers Absolute and percentage of change from baseline in complement biomarkers (e.g., Ba, C3a and sC5B9) are evaluated at the end of treatment (12 weeks) for Cohorts 1 and 2. Additional details are described in the SAP. 9.4.1.2 Change in Hemoglobin Absolute and percentage change from baseline in hemoglobin are evaluated at the end of treatment (12 weeks) for Cohorts 1 and 2. Additional details are described in the SAP. 9.4.1.3 Time to Hemoglobin Response Hemoglobin response is defined as an increase in hemoglobin levels of > 1g/dL from baseline. Hemoglobin response is evaluated at the end of treatment (12 weeks) for Cohorts 1 and 2. Additional details are described in the SAP. 9.4.1.4 Markers of Hemolysis Absolute and percentage change from baseline of the markers of hemolysis (serum LDH levels, absolute reticulocyte count, serum indirect bilirubin, serum haptoglobin and hemopexin) are evaluated at the end of treatment (12 weeks) for Cohorts 1 and 2. Additional details are described in the SAP. 9.4.1.5 Exploratory Analysis of Change in Biomarkers Related to VOC Biomarkers related to VOC may be evaluated after end of treatment (12 weeks for Cohorts 1 and 2). Additional details are described in the SAP. 9.4.2 Exploratory Assessment of VOC Sickle cell disease–related pain crises (VOC) are defined as acute episodes of pain, with no medically determined cause other than a VOC event that result in a medical facility visit and treatment with either oral or parenteral narcotic agents, or with a parenteral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Uncomplicated VOCs are defined as no occurrence of any other SCD complication during the VOC episode. Complicated VOCs are defined as the presence of a diagnosis of other SCD complications during the VOC episode. Acute chest syndrome, hepatic sequestration, splenic sequestration, and priapism are considered as VOC events in this study. Complicated VOCs are also to be reported as AEs. The following may also be assessed if available: ^ Number of VOCs leading to a healthcare visit ^ Number of uncomplicated VOCs, acute chest syndrome, hepatic sequestration, splenic sequestration, and priapism PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO ^ Time to first VOC after first dose of study drug 9.4.3 Safety Analyses The primary endpoint for the study is safety and tolerability. All safety analyses are performed on the Safety Population and are reported by each cohort. Safety analyses include an analysis of all TEAEs, ECGs, clinical laboratory data, physical examinations, and vital sign measurements using descriptive statistics. No inferential statistical analyses are planned on the safety parameters of this study. The prevalence of AEs and SAEs is summarized, by SOC and Preferred Term for each cohort and treatment arm and overall, within each treatment arm, and by relationship to study drug. AEs also are summarized by cohort and treatment arm, and overall, within each treatment arm, and by severity. SAEs and AEs resulting in withdrawal from the study are listed. Participants having multiple AEs within a category (e.g., overall, SOC, Preferred Term) are counted once in that category. For severity tables, a participant’s most severe event within a category is counted. Changes from baseline in vital sign measurements and laboratory assessments (e.g., clinical chemistry, cell blood count with differential, and urinalysis) are summarized by each cohort and overall. Laboratory parameter values are graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v5.0, published 27 Nov 2017). Shift tables by cohort and treatment arm are produced for these laboratory parameters. These tables summarize the number of participants with each baseline grade relative to the reference ranges and changes to the worst highest grade assessed postdose during the study. All concomitant medications are coded using the World Health Organization Drug Dictionary, and the frequency and percentage of concomitant medications is summarized. 9.4.3.1 ECG Analysis Cardiac assessments are performed in the Safety Population. The ECG parameters are measured at the specified time points, including heart rate, PR, RR, QRS, QT, and QTcF intervals. The average of the triplicate ECG readings at the time points collected is calculated, and changes from pretreatment baseline values are assessed by each cohort and treatment arm. An outlier analysis is performed that summarize the absolute count, frequency and percentage of participants who meet any of the following outlier criteria at each visit by cohort and treatment arm: ^ QT, QTcF interval > 450 msec ^ QT, QTcF interval > 480 msec ^ QT, QTcF interval > 500 msec ^ QT, QTcF interval increases from baseline > 30 msec ^ QT, QTcF interval increases from baseline > 60 msec PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO Analysis of drug-related QT/QTc interval changes relative to plasma PK concentrations may be conducted on all dose regimens. The principles of this analysis follow the statistical methods described by Garnett et al. (Garnett, 2018). Detailed analyses are specified in the SAP or a separate ECG analysis plan. 9.4.4 Other Analyses 9.4.1.1 Pharmacokinetic Analyses All PK analyses are performed on the PK Population and are reported by cohort. The individual serum concentration data from patients who receive the SC dose of the fusion polypeptide described herein with actual sampling dates and times are used to characterize PK using a population PK analysis approach. The details are provided in the SAP. 9.4.1.2 Pharmacodynamic Analyses All PD analyses areperformed on the PD Population and are reported by cohort. The PD effects of all the SC doses of the fusion polypeptide described herein administered are evaluated by assessing changes in serum total and free properdin concentrations and CAP activity using the Weislab AP assay. In addition, an exploratory assessment of other measures of properdin activity over time may be considered as deemed appropriate. 9.4.1.3 Immunogenicity Analysis For assessment of immunogenicity, the incidence of confirmed positive ADAs is summarized. Additionally, following confirmation of positive ADAs, samples are assessed for ADA titer and presence of neutralizing antibodies (if possible). 9.4.1.4 Exploratory Analysis Additional exploratory analysis on biomarker assays and clinical efficacy endpoint may be conducted. Details of these analyses are presented in the SAP. 9.5 Interim Analyses An interim analysis may be performed after at least 12 patients from Cohorts 1 and 2 (6 from each cohort) have enrolled and completed the Treatment Period to inform later phase trials. The interim analysis includes safety, efficacy, PK/PD and immunogenicity data. Details of this analysis are presented in the SAP. 10. Laboratory Tests The protocol-required clinical laboratory tests detailed in Table 13 are performed by a central laboratory unless otherwise specified. PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO Table 13: Protocol-required Laboratory Assessments Laboratory Parameters Assessments Hematology Platelet count ) PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO Table 13: Protocol-required Laboratory Assessments Laboratory Parameters Assessments Microscopic examination (If blood or protein is abnormal Abbreviations: AP = alternative pathway; CAP = complement alternative pathway; CCP = complement classical pathway; HBc = hepatitis B core; IEC = Independent Ethics Committee; IgG = immunoglobulin G; IgM = immunoglobulin M; IRB = Institutional Review Board; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; LP = lectin pathway; MCH = mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCV = mean corpuscular volume; SAE = serious adverse event; VOC = vaso-occlusive crisis. A list of abbreviations and their explanation is provided in Table 14. Table 14: Abbreviations and Specialist Terms Abbreviation or Explanation Term PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO Table 14: Abbreviations and Specialist Terms Abbreviation or Explanation Term PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO Table 14: Abbreviations and Specialist Terms Abbreviation or Explanation Term
PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO Example 2. Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Immunogenicity of Anti-Properdin/ Anti-Serum Albumin Bispecific Single Variable Domain Antibody in Healthy Adults: Results of a Phase 1 Study This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) administration the fusion polypeptide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:1, or a modification thereof, in healthy adults. In this phase I first-in-human (FIH) study, healthy volunteers aged 18 to 65 years were randomized to the fusion polypeptide or placebo (3:1). The fusion polypeptide was administered SC in single and multiple ascending doses and IV as a single dose. Ten dosing cohorts were planned (FIG.2). Two cohorts did not open for enrollment, as the expected complete inhibition of the complement AP would be >70 days. Due to the potentially increased risk of Neisseria meningitidis infection with properdin inhibition, vaccination was required before receiving the fusion polypeptide described herein and the participants remained on antibiotics for the duration of treatment. Sixty participants were randomized (fusion polypeptide, 45; placebo, 15). Cohorts 1, 3, 4, and 5 had 5 participants (each) treated with the fusion polypeptide; cohorts 2, 6, and 9 had 6 participants treated with the fusion polypeptide; and cohort 8 had 7 participants treated with the fusion polypeptide. Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar for the fusion polypeptide and placebo arms. Four participants discontinued from the study: 1 was lost to follow-up, 1 after use of prohibited medication, and 2 withdrew consent (1 following an adverse event [AE] on placebo). There were no discontinuations due to AEs in participants exposed to the fusion polypeptide. The majority of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were mild and assessed as not related to study treatment. There were no serious AEs, serious events of infections, or deaths. TEAE incidence was similar across cohorts. Treatment-related TEAEs occurred more frequently in the fusion polypeptide than the placebo group (11 [24.4%] vs 2 [13.3%]); the most common treatment-related TEAEs with the fusion polypeptide were nausea (n=2), headache (n=2), and infusion site erythema (n=2). No infections with N. meningitidis were reported. Dose proportionality was observed for all single dose cohorts except 50 mg. Geometric mean accumulation ratios, R Cmax and R AUC , were approximately 2.8 and 3, respectively, after multiple doses. Mean absolute bioavailability of the SC administered fusion polypeptide was 94%. Complement alternative pathway (AP) activity decreased immediately following administration of the fusion polypeptide (FIG.3). With increasing dose, the duration of complete AP blockade (<1% of baseline) increased; in cohorts 4, 5, and 6, complete AP inhibition was sustained for >30 days. In all single-dose cohorts, mean %AP hemolysis returned to baseline by the end of the observation period. In multiple-dose cohorts, complete inhibition of AP activity was observed for 70 days and 84 days (cohorts 8 and 9, respectively). There was no change in the classical pathway (CP) and lectin pathway (LP) activity. Four participants had pre-existing immunoreactivity at baseline, none of which were treatment- boosted. Treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies (ADA) occurred in 20%, 40%, 100%, and 83.3% of PATENT ATTORNEY-DOCKET NO.: 0692 WO participants in the 150 mg SC, 450 mg SC, 450 mg IV, and 1200 mg SC groups, respectively; most had low titers, which did not impact PK. In multiple-dose cohorts (cohorts 8 and 9), 71.4% and 100% developed ADA, respectively, most of whom had low titers and transient duration of response. In this FIH study in healthy participants, the fusion polypeptide described herein showed no unexpected safety concerns and was well-tolerated. Complement AP inhibition by the fusion polypeptide described herein was rapid and complete, and the CP and LP were not affected. OTHER EMBODIMENTS Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity of understanding, the descriptions and examples should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention. The disclosures of all patent and scientific literature cited herein are expressly incorporated in their entirety by reference.